Ignition
-
Posts
1115 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Ignition
-
missing crash .log file Crash when joining as CPG in an airborn Apache
Ignition replied to Zarma's topic in Bugs and Problems
The problem is still in 2025. Started cold, added some waypoints and comms, leave the aircraft and when rejoining crash every time. Landed, shutted down the aircraft on the ground and rejoined without issue. -
I think I will not buy any other 3rd party module again. I still have the F-15E and I'm waiting for a positive resolution. I like how it was modeled and I like to see it fully developed.
-
You're talking to Razbam developers. 3D art developer and aircraft systems developer You're wrong about the M2K and the "feature complete" modules. The continuous development nature of DCS makes necessary to have the original developer in charge of their products to continuously maintain and improve their modules, not only for bug fixes. It happens with all the modules in DCS, even for the ED modules.
-
You can lower and rise the sun visor in the F-15E, it's very useful
-
I don't like the idea of many default liveries, it takes a lot of space and you can't delete them. HB made 30GB of liveries for only 2 aircraft that are impossible to delete. It's a waste of space specially if you don't fly those aircraft. It should be official liveries to download as mods though, so anyone who wants can install those.
-
The other day we employed the gun against a group of 10+ infantry. The gun in DCS is very under performing, we could see how the rounds impacted near the targets and they just ran like nothing, some rounds should have mada some serious damage. It was very funny when there was only 1 infantry and we couldn't kill him.
-
The FCR is not synchronized since more than a year now. Specially the elevation antenna, but also the ACQ. This makes almost impossible to use for the CPG and Pilot. The way to synchronize it is by lowering the antenna to the maximum and then raise it again every time.
-
The DCS F-15E is the only modern strike fighter with multiplayer multicrew.
-
After the F-35 announcement classified is not a valid answer. It was something we all understood all these years, but now is not an answer. If more powerful doesn't mean better then WHY AN F-35? There're plenty of other aircrafts to do. If its money the answer, an F-22 would sell 10 times more than the F-15C, although I also wouldn't buy it.
-
Why not an F-22 instead of the F-15C
-
Yes I still can fly a module which had 6 months of updates since release in EA and 1 year of nothing. I don't waste time on modules which are lacking many core systems and I don't know what's going to happen. I only fly aircraft which are almost complete or are worth learning meanwhile they are updated. It also has bugs on multicrew. For a EA release was really good but 1 year after in the exact same condition is not acceptable for me. Why I will waste time flying a module that is half done. Only if you play DCS casually to shoot some stuff. Combined arms is 40 dollars, its very infuriating to use it on a grand campaign when the units get stuck all the time. We play a dynamic campaign incorporating combined arms to capture many places and its really annoying to use since the AI is so basic. For example it doesn't know their surroundings, they don't work independently, they don't have reverse, you can't separate units from a formation or regroup them to another. It has been like this since the release, 12 years ago but it was very cheap back then like 15 dollars. Now it's 40 and its exactly the same.
-
What a disappointing 2024, and 2025 and beyond doesn't look any more promising. I'm not interested in the F-15C, Eurofighter and much less in the F-35 based on demo videos. I just wanted to fly the F-15E with a friend coop and buying all the maps to fly it in all of them. I'm still waiting for a resolution but the only message I get from ED is they don't want to continue and don't want anything to do with the RB F-15E, after almost a year of complete silence and with the video reveal of 2025 with less aircrafts than 2024. If they want to improve the communication as Wags said, this is not the way. 50% of the video was showing the Eurofighter which it looks like it still needs a lot more time, if it weren't for Heatblur the video would have lasted 3 minutes. The dynamic campaign looks like it needs at least one more year. Also there's no news on AI ground path finding and logic. Combined Arms is the most expensive module for what it is, its really frustrating to move units on a strategic view, is not even a 1990 game. I was never so disappointed for DCS, I don't even want to fly. Loosing 3 modules is not funny.
-
It already happened with other 3rd party. And as I've said, it depends on the contract. The contract may say for how long the payments may be retained and maybe it was normal to receive payments after some time.
-
I'm sure ED wants to do an F-15E at some point, if this issue is not resolved. And after the F-35 announcement they can do any aircraft they want.
-
This is overdramatic HAHAHA I like the "publicly available for anyone to use" LOL It depends on the contract, what they've signed. And IP LOL
-
Why?, just by the name? Those are 2 completely different aircraft.
-
So it will be a 2027+ ?
-
I want to thank Razbam again to say publicly they wouldn't update their modules. Imagine 9 months of silence without any update LOL.
-
4 years and we still don't know which version of the A6 will be in DCS.
-
Yes, it's 11 months since the last Razbam update.
-
Even if the modules still work it doesn't mean they are fine. For me the F-15E is unusable since it misses many features and I don't care it still works. I don't fly aircrafts with bugs and half developed if I know the module doesn't have any future. 9 months, we're close to the anniversary. I'm sure there will be a nice video like we are used to with nice music and footage commemorating this achievement.
-
It's incredible the ED-Newsletters don't work as they should. 90% of the news are useless info there. Razbam didn't refuse the WSO AI. First - it was going to be a utility more than an AI since in the F-15E the pilot can do all the work. Second - they didn't/couldn't develop such AI since they have a dispute with ED for more than a year of not getting paid.
-
3 more months for the anniversary!
-
3rd party business in DCS is very risky for the customers. We can lose any module in the future.
-
How do we know this won't happen again with other 3rd party?, it already happened with VEAO and now with RAZBAM. It may be a cyclic warning from ED to other 3rd parties to produce force with their military product.
