joker62

Awesome. Thank You.

I agree. I've rarely read such a detailed, honest and proactive report. There're moments of waiting that seem endless, but when such a report is sent, one is even more willing to wait for the next update. Thanks a lot, good job.

Very exciting to read about EDDCE, its structure and the progress made. Obviously, I think we all are eager to field-test the flexibility and complexity of this engine. We stay tuned for more news when available. Thank you.

Great newsletter. I immediately bought the upgrade to the fantastic BS3 and can't wait to fly it. I'm happy that the work on FA-18c and SC continues, as well as on the new cooling system (even for Yak-52). Great job in today's OB . THANKS.

and sorry if someone has already reported this. example: I fly FA-18C in the sea of PG. The average air temperature at sea level between the Arab Emirates and Iran (obtained daily online from weather sites) is on average 23-26 degrees, even in the months of December, January and February, rarely dropping to 16-20 degrees . In DCS (weather static conditions) in December the air temperature is stuck at a maximum of 15 degrees. Please can you unlock temperatures in ALL maps? In this way everyone will be able to set the local air temperatures of the area in which he will fly. Thanks in advance.

Yes, I understood that, I'll wait. So each third party will have to work on their own map? In this case it will really be a longer job than expected ...

The screenshots of PG are really wonderful and exciting. Thanks for your hard work. However, I hope they will be soon available also in the other maps.

I agree too.

The degrees on the compass rose (in F10 map) are difficult to read, at least for me, even with eyeglasses. Please, is it possible: - make the degrees numbers sharper or bigger (even better)? - add some more colors besides the current one? - add another (selectable) double sized compass rose? Thank you for this very useful tools and for your attention.

Well, we'll certainly stay tuned for updates. Thanks.

I fully agree! Waiting for how ED will decide on this.

Thank you very much for fixes and updates. Can't wait to try it.

I don't want to make controversy or start sterile debates, but I think similar features in a flight simulator completely out of place. There should be an option for those who want to activate these features and not vice versa, for those who don't want to have them. However, thanks to Bignewy (for autoexec.cfg) to remove these, in my opinion, senseless features.

Thank you very much

Thank for clarification. So, at the moment, no Ramat David or Beirut in the planned airfields. However, I'm confident to see these airfields in the future map extension based on user feedback. Thanks again for your good work.

The high detail area should also include airports of Haifa, Ramat David ect, but these are not included in your list. Will they still be included on your map? Other people have also asked about this, but I havent found any answer. It's possible to know something about it. What Sirrah observed is fully shared by me, even for single missions, not necessarily in a campaign. Thanks in advance.

Thank you very much! Outstanding work!

thanks for the reply, I had completely missed this interview, or maybe I didn't understand this detail well. I always prefer something written. Thanks again.

Thanks for the reply. If so we hope they will introduce this exciting feature as soon as possible.

About A-1H Skyraider: at first glance I am really thrilled with this exceptional aircraft. Waiting for other news. About SC: what does this phrase "we are also working on directing aircraft from parking to catapults and from the landing box to parking" really mean? Is there something more or different from what we have now? Can you give some more information please? About AI BFM for jet aircraft: what to say ... I can't wait to try this new and dynamic aspect of aerial combat. So, a nice newsletter. Thanks a lot.

Strange ... you certainly tried to do a new mission from scratch, right? Have you installed Mods? I've installed Navy Equipment Mod without any problems. Excuse silly question, but what wind and turbulence values did you set in the mission? In DCS, turbulence of 25 and more begins to affect your FA-18 during "groove". Same thing for wind: by setting a wind of 30 kts and a minimum carrier speed of 5 kts, you will have a wind on the deck equal to about 35 kts), so during "groove" you will see E-bracket and Velocity Vectory on your HUD that will dance a lot, and maintain correct FA-18's attitude until landing is not easy. But all these results existed even before the introduction of the new burble effect, and although they are interdependent, they have nothing to do with the burble effect we are talking about. Of course ED will have to review the whole thing and they are aware of it. I'm sorry, I don't know how to help you.

Tweaks regarding burble effect and FA-18 FM are still ongoing https://forum.dcs.world/topic/302078-carrier-burble/?do=findComment&comment=4981175 https://forum.dcs.world/topic/303333-ob-hornet-performance-changes/?do=findComment&comment=4993660 However, the burble effect definitely needs to be improved. I'm not an FA-18 pilot, but I always refer to an excellent guide written by Pieterras "Aircraft_Carrier_Operating_Procedures_for_DCS_v01_8" https://forum.dcs.world/topic/261997-how-cyclic-ops-really-works- by-gb-and-pieter / What is reported on page 77 is really interesting Still on p. 38 reads From this it's clear that corrections such as power reduction to catch wire, pull down stick to catch wire and the like (i.e. expedients to limit burble effect in DCS) are not normally correct, consequently the current burble effect is not correct. So I understood it. For this I have disabled wake turbolence in the game options, to eliminate the burble effect, until it will be tuned correctly.

Hi fagulha, thanks for reply. I too was waiting for the burble effect and now, like you, I have also disabled wake urbulence. I understand that it is not easy to refine the burble effect and FA-18 flight model, and I really appreciate the efforts of ED, but in the meantime I have suggested this solution to allow us to take advantage of the wake turbulence again and have fun in landing FA-18 on the carrier. antonio.

Hi Minsky, thanks for your reply. In fact it is just like that for me. Yes, they are working on it, we hope the tweak will arrive soon.

Since Burble effect was introduced, I've disabled Wake turbulence, thus limiting the Burble effect (in my humble opinion with too high values). In this way, however, the aircraft on which I fly (FA-18) is no longer affected by the wake turbulence of other aircrafts. I think it is a good idea to add in Options> Gameplay (additional settings), Burble Effect ON / OFF (as it's already for Wake turbulence), so as to allow greater flexibility of choice. This request affects both FA-18 and SC, so I post it in both threads. The moderator will then eventually merge the threads. Thanks in adavance.