Dehuman

You could try limiting the number of aircraft available at the airfield BUT replenish the numbers slowly by having the base re-supplied by either another airfield or a warehouse. Burn through all (X amount) of (Y aircraft) in 45mins? Too bad, next one is 15 mins away.

I turn it off sometimes when rolling in to gun strafe a target if it is cluttered. Not something I'll be doing if a threat is imminent so no harm having it off. Ok so they can't be removed IRL, can the number shown be limited by priority?

-32 & -54 hopefully maybe

:thumbup:

Speaking of GCI did you have any luck getting LotAtc running? Also a suggestion (sorry for the work :P ) ; -Move human flight comms to a seperate frequency from AI EWR. Some players are quiet but AI always shouts. -ATC frequency for ATC. Using SRS for runway traffic is great but when the server is busy it clogs up the GCI frequency. For aircraft that cannot manually dial a frequency (L-39, MiG-19 and MiG-21 are the only ones?) they'll need setting in the ME On caucuses L-39 is missing Novorossiysk & Sukhumi. MiG-21 is missing Krasnodar P, Soganlug & Vaziani. MiG-19... well that as you know is missing most airfields. On PG they'll have to be set as reqd.

1. Tu-22 2. Su-24, 25 & 34

It seems ED had to change a chunk of the core to implement the SuperCarrier. This broke all the other ships, FARPS, and even airfields with automatic parking allocation. I'd like to believe ED share details of what exactly gets changed each build to help 3rd parties speedily fix stuff but uh... am not optimistic

There is no real IFF. No JF-17 here. The expanded IFF of SRS and LotAtc is not at work here either (and doesn't suport the Soviet SR-ZO/SOD interrogator/transponder) MiG-21's IFF capability is handy but not reliable due to the radar limitations. Friendly contact may have been merged with a bandit on your scope. Or had fallen out of detection parameters during the interrogation and remained on scope as persistence. Unless you have a clear visual on a solitary aircraft, away from any ground clutter, VID is needed.

Using VAICOMPRO with "Extended Command Set" enabled you can call AWACS for a bogey dope. However all communications have to be user initiated. Won't get pop up groups or merges called to you which is arguably the most important.

:huh: Doing the thing you said they should be doing?

OK that makes sense and seems like a good idea. :thumbup:

On the subject of FARPS being attacked. I think they should be seen as a tactical luxury. In the forward area they are always going to be a vulnerable and important target. Of course they shouldn't be undefended either and Helicopters should be able to spawn from the main airbase and carry crates to re-build damaged FARPS. On why it may seem that RED attacks FARPS more than BLUE. - On some missions the FARP is the primary ground target for RED. (Catch Me If You Can, Swedish Delivery) - RED teams do seem to be "objective oriented" more often than BLUE. Common to see a MiG-21 carrying rockets or bombs, yet for some reason Tiger pilots seldom take anything other than a pure AA loadout. Puzzling because the F-5 can carry an impressive weapon load and doesn't sacrifice any of it's AAM space to do so. Can even carry GBU-12s that can be lased by a friendly JTAC or Harrier. - Viggens are often nightmares for red FARPS. I've been re-learning the M-2000C now that the control layout is finalised and AdA approved. Took it up in Sukhumi Unleashed. What a massacre! I had forgtten what it's like to have a useable Radar at low altitude. Took me ages to sink the two frigates with Mavericks from the Harrier but well worth it!

They still have the NAVFLIR

This thread started it I believe https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=255929

Hopefully when ED implements the IADS (integrated air defence system) things will improve. Currently there is some data link / sharing between ai units but I need to test this further. It would obviously be ideal to have a single EWR unit communicating with players the shared picture from all ground units.

I'm not sure if there is still some bugginess on DCS side regarding blue EWR. They used to straight up not work with the blue callsigns. Just as Jtac wouldn't work with the red numerical callsigns. Their overall detection range is similar to AWACS however being on the ground terrain interferes with them. They also have a conical blindspot above them.

Missed this. No L-39 always has the gun camera mounted. If you do have it dismounted in your special options then ED is mistaken. IFR hood is dismounted 9/10

Use Georgian EWR and it's in English and imperial units. It converts the callsigns to the AWACS (Warrior gets changed to Wizard, for example) ones so use one of the first 4(5?) on the list.

Viggen drivers have always been a group with questionable morality... :smilewink: Pretty simple. Each coalition has at least one airbase defended with MBTs, ATGMs and a tonne of SAMs. Pretty sure this is the case most of the time already.

In regards to new features this is great. In regards to fixes of bugs introduced in the previous patch, not so much. Dieing because the next heli spawned on the same farp spot as you is getting a little tiresome. Take time baking new stuff but keep the hot fixes rolling

Because the light is set to the AoA you cannot fire the gun, not the airframes critical AoA. Agreed an AoA gauge would be nice - the sensor is obviously there. Maybe it was deemed undesirable for a primarily trainer aircraft.

Updates do come, just the information on them is little to none. For its age it gets far more attention than any of EDs modules of a similar vintage.

Hey Alpenwolf can you check this? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=271064

Thanks for following this up. How it is intended to work is a bit sub-optimal but it is what it is. :thumbup:

Yes with the gun turned on it lights up when you are exceeding the allowed AOA for firing the gun