Razorback

It's understandable that a lot of work has gone into correcting the problems, and the two successive patches to the latest update are further proof of this. However, I'd like to point out that this particular problem was mentioned more than a year ago (17 Jan 2023 !!!) and has never been corrected... it's getting to be a long time. So this bug was already reported long before the CH-47 was released. So we can only hope that a solution will finally be found quickly... And the arrival of the CH-47 module doesn't seem to have given this topic any priority... which is a shame.

I totally agree, the F10 map is not easy to use, especially for VFR Fly in Helos. - Nearly no marking names related to vilages. - Powerlines are only visible when you zoom to the max level While these are stop lines that are very useful for navigation. I'd really like the F10 map to look like a real, usable map. The current colours are also very surprising and confusing. Personally, I find this F10 map practically unusable. Flappie created a map for the Caucasus which, in my opinion, is the best map currently available on DCS. It would be great to have an F10 map for CWG that looks like this model. I'd also like to mention that this is practically one of the only negative points of this map, because the rest of the work that's been done is just amazing. The level of detail is very impressive, so a very big thank you for this achievement.

The T34 is more a World War II tank than a Cold War tank, even though it was for example still used in the years 8-90 in the former Yugoslavia.

The is also nearly no city and village names on the F10 map. It could be nice to se these names when zooming on the map. Thxxxxx

On the "Cold War Germany map" promo video we can see a T-62M and a BTR-70. These two assests are not yet available in DCS. Is there an asset pack "Cold War" planned (paying or not) ? null

Nous sommes à toujours à la recherche de pilotes sur les machines suivantes : - Mi-24P - S342 Gazelle - UH-1H Huey - A-10CII (01 pilote) - CH-47 (01 pilote) Dernier update de notre organigramme

Ok, I am good to go ! It was a litte bit tricky but I finally did it! Thx for your help ! I will try tomorrow during a multiplayer mission. It was good to know that the password "58D" is needed if we want to have access on the Data Loader Menu.

Top, a simple video to explain the "step by step" processe could be great ! My resquest is mainly on loading waypoints and routes. Thx for that, I will for sure try that later today.

Il ne vous reste plus qu'à rejoindre notre Discord pour en savoir plus https://discord.gg/bzDJvQrnTQ

Hi, I know that it is possible to prepare a navigation plan with waypoints via the mission editor and then load this into the Kiowa after the mission is launched. Is there a video tutorial to explain this or could someone explain the exact procedure to follow? Many thanks...

null

Yessss...finally the release of the AFG map... Sad to see that the video doesn't include more low-level views of the terrain (especially in urban areas). Not everyone flies an F-18... So in future videos, please incorporate more low-altitude shots, as it was the case for the IRAQ map video. I'm pleasantly surprised that ED and Currenthill are working together... when will we see wider cooperation on integrating these mods?

Voler en OH-58 c'est bien. Voler en multicrew sur OH-58...c'est mieux Le Bataillon "Recco" du 06th MHR compte entre autre une escadrille sur OH-58 KW, les "LYNX"! Nous avons actuellement 04 pilotes actifs dans cette escadrille (nombre maximal de machines en vol) et on recherche donc des candidats pour rejoindre cette équipe et faire autant que possible de multicrew sur la machine. A priori comme CPO mais toujours possible d'alterner les 2 postes dans certaines machines. C'est un réel multiplicateur d'efficacité Si vous avez envie de vous laisser tenter par l'aventure, ne pas hésiter à nous contacter...

On recrute de manière active 03 pilotes Mi-24P pour redynamiser notre escadrille Fennec. Si vous aimez cette machine et qu'envie de rejoindre une grosse trentaine de pilotes pour 2 vols semaines (lundi et jeudi soir), n'hésitez pas à rejoindre notre Discord en on pourra vous en dire plus....

New Ural trucks within the last DCS update ? Where ? I don't see any new civilian Ural truck. Seems to be a new KRAZ 6322... null

Memo based on what ? I still don't think I've seen a single screenshot in 7 months linked to the update of quality of the map... Statements like that can be made and received every week... But for the moment they're just empty words, as it was the case at the time of the release, when we were told we'd have an update every 3 months.... I'm personally convinced that improvements are being made, but at what rate? At the end, it's totally incomprehensible to me that two ED maps are released within a few months of each other, and that one of them has to be almost completely reworked to "meets the expected quality standards". Is ED really hoping that customers will buy the complete maps when availability schedules are likely to be completely different from what has been announced? Yes, we're passionate gamers who spend several hours a week on our favourite simulator, but patience has its limits and ED has to stop treating customers as just wallets that will open blindly to replenish ED's money coffers.

What's really surprising is that both the AFG and IRQ maps were developed in-house by ED...during the same period. It takes several months (or even years) to produce these maps, and in the end the quality of the modelisation is quite different. Not on the same standard... This gives the impression that even within ED there is a lack of communication and coordination between the teams of developers. Production coordinator and supervisor at ED ? Quality Control? Anyway... Once again, one wonders if there is a captain to manage the ship. All in all, it's yet another blunder that brings DCS's operations into disrepute. Personally, my purchases of modules on DCS are on “Hold” mode, and probably will be for a long time. This chaos linked to the AFG map is one worry too many. At this point, my confidence is totally broken.

The announcement of the F-35 certainly crossed a line. As far as I'm concerned, there will be a before and an after to the announcement of the development of this highly classified aircraft, which will undoubtedly be a very random module in terms of flight behaviour, avionics and weapons. In short, we're a long way from the hardcore simulation of DCS. - We can't have Stinger on the Apache, but we will have an F-35. - We can't have UPK-32 on the Hind, but we will have an F-35. And those are just two examples. What do I expect from DCS in 2025? NOTHING! We'll probably get a Central Europe map, and depending on how this map will be presented, that'll probably be my only payment of the year.... And if we end up with the same kind of announcement as for the AFG map, with the risk of totally unacceptable changes to the timetable, I'll pass on that too. Proposing a MIG-29 and an F-15C was totally sufficient for me. This F-35 thing is totally crazy compared to what ED has always advocated in its simulation management. When you read the criticisms on a lot of forums, I don't seem to be the only one to draw this conclusion. Nor to see clearly that the most important thing now seems to be to replenish ED's money coffers by continuing to offer us unfinished products. As someone who flies exclusively on helicopters, I've got everything I need. Thank you for all your hard work and good luck for the future....but for my part, I've lost my faith after more than 17 years on Lock On, FC and DCS.

What's done is done and the details don't really concern us. All we are interested in is seeing that in the future the development, adaptations and improvements of Polychop's two modules, the Gazelle and the Kiowa, will be a reality as announced in their last statement. As a customer, that's all I ask... As a regular user of Kiowa since the release, improvements are necessary and expected, and that's the only doubt I have since today's crisis...

New infantry model and animation.... We have now the UH-1, The Mi-8, the Chinook...and still no fast roping possibilities. It doesn't seem feasible... unlike opening hatches in certain modules, which add nothing for gaming.

I don’t expect anything from the next ED videos. Just a moment of fun. Fore sure I will not focus on 2025 but on the « beyond » part of the video title. C-130, F-4U, Mariannes WW2,….Announced so long ago When we see how long it was to release the new B-52 & B-1 AI assets we can’t expect any new (ground) assests soon….A lot of vehicles are outdated. So be it…. Yes I am quite negative but after the chaos of the AFG map released in June and announced with updates each tree months (we are still waiting the first one ) I will remain pragmatic. Return to the reality…and reality is what is currently available. All the rest is pure speculation despite ED announcements. Two more weeks and all is subject to change

I am looking for the VAC fiche of the King Hussein Air college... Anything available ? Thxxx

Nice to ear that the MiG-29A Fulcrum is "advancing full speed" but why it's not the case with the already released modules ? The CH-47, and it's just one of multiple exemples, was launched months ago and a lot of bugs or unfinished possibilities remains. CTLD script is necessary to build nice missions in multiplayer. There are still major problems with the radios and SRS. Since the release only some bugs were resolved but a lot of things are still missing. Is it not possible to set "full speed" to solve these really annoying problems as well? OK, it isn't a new problem, and we all know that sometimes it takes a long time to improve products... and that my complain has also been written by others at many times. But once again we're going to be offered a new module, which will almost certainly not be completely finished when it's released, while things are moving at a snail's speed when it comes to finishing or at least simply making ‘usable’ modules that have been distributed for months. I suppose that a "2025 and beyond" video will come in the next few weeks. I'm not expecting anyone to sell me a dream, I'm mainly waiting for operational existing modules. Even if we know that this isn't the most financially attractive objective for ED.