-
Posts
904 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Mig Fulcrum
-
Community A-4E-C v2.3 (May 2025)
Mig Fulcrum replied to plusnine's topic in Flyable/Drivable Mods for DCS World
Thanks, I didn't knew about that, always learning something. -
I don't really think the entire italian community would buy it, it's not like the 104 which was isued for more then 40 years and is loved by everyone italy. Many italians don't even know we used the F-86K But it is for sure an interesting aircraft
-
Dovrebbe essere indipendente dal modulo. Ho provato con 3 aerei, uno nuovo, uno vecchio e uno antico: rispettivamente F-16, F-86 e Mig-25 e funziona con tutti Anche la mod A-4 funziona
-
Community A-4E-C v2.3 (May 2025)
Mig Fulcrum replied to plusnine's topic in Flyable/Drivable Mods for DCS World
Hi, I would like to request some features to increase realism in this awesome mod that I love since day1. - Remove the capability of carring 4 AIM-9 since the only variant that could do it was the A-4G for RAN and RNZAF (I know there are Australian and New Zeland liveries so I can understand if this request would be ignored ) - Introduce the possibility to remove countermeasures from ME like we can with the ECM control panel: this was in fact a late modification of some A-4E but not a standard feature, just like the RHAW, and since we can remove the RHAW panel I don't se why can't with the countermeasures one, it would better rappresent a "standard" navy A-4E - Remove AIM-9J: being a USAF-only missile the actual A-4 could only carry B,D and maybe G. I can understand the AIM-9P being an export variant and could be used with non-USN/USMC A-4E, but the AIM-9J is just out of place and don't bring anything new to the table Let me know... -
Uups lol, shame on me. This is the problem of doing research at 4AM Thanks for the answer
-
Is it known if the IRIAF variant will have the Link-4C F/F? AS far as I know it shouldn't but does anyone know if it's truo or if HB said something about it?
-
Dubito che un rig così sia superato, io giro su monitor 1440p a 50/60fps con la mia 1070 e i7 6700K con la grafica decisamente non al ribasso, tendo a tenere tutto su alto/ultra
-
Thanks, I know very well that pic but I don't trust it very much, I compared with fligh manuals and other sources and it seems the dates are a bit off. Maybe the dates here are just the testings and not the actual put on service
-
Non penso abbiano un nome, ma dovrebbero esserci i credits degli sviluppatori
-
Progress pictures on the Eurofighter Typhoon
Mig Fulcrum replied to DashTrueGrit's topic in DCS: Eurofighter
I think yes, we are talking about Heablur... A fantastic 3rd party but non so great about timing. Remember the F-4 should have been released in Dec 2022, it's 1,5 year delay of a module almost ready. Here with the Typhoon it's not even close. And if we consider in the manitime the wand to push out the Viggen from the EA, introduce F-14A early, F-14 95GR and F-4E DMAS... So yeah, i would be surprised if it come before 2030. I would point out that from F-14B and F-4E release there are 5 years -
Progress pictures on the Eurofighter Typhoon
Mig Fulcrum replied to DashTrueGrit's topic in DCS: Eurofighter
Maybe you mean 2035, lol jk But non ironically I doubt we will se a Thyphoon before 2030 -
I get it but there are no way to simulate a spanish F-4, to me this AIM-9 is a bit out of place, given the fact there is already the AIM-9J and AIM-9L
-
As far as know the AIM-9JULI was only a Spanish thing, beeing AIM-9J with L seeker, modified by a German manfacturer but not adopted by Germany. Since our phantom isn't a C variant and there are no spanish liveries i'm asking: Why do our Phantom carry that specific missile?
-
Basically The F-86D was armed with A-A rockets only, the US considered the ranging computer and sight too advanced and classified to be exported so they made the K, which is a D with the entire rocket system removed in favor of a more traditional 4x20mm cannons I think you were meaning the F-86E vs F-86K, not D vs K, since Italy only got E and K. Sabredog and Kappone should perform equally
-
Finally some wise words, it's the same thing i say for ages!!
-
Perchè gli svilupaptori del Sud atlantico sono quelli che hanno fatto Kola, Orbx e Razbam fungevano solo da distributori
-
Nice thanks! I really love the Mirage III and the EE would be perfect to emulate even the french ones. I do hope to fly it one day. Please Aerges
-
Don't really know how the G.91 would perform against an F-86, it's much lighter for sure but it has a slightly less powerful engine. On paper it seems to be better, maybe a bit slower, but I don't know in terms of energy retention and nose authority how it perform
-
Un Navy Phantom dell'epoca giusta per fare Vietnam sarebbe carino. Che sia un B o un J. Purtroppo la community chiede a gran voce una mappa Vietnam ma di moduli del periodo giusto ora come ora ce ne sono gran pochi... In verità solo lo Huey e l'A-4E mod
- 181 replies
-
- f-4e
- phantom ii
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Se è in nome della qualità sono ben contento di aspettare, nel frattempo di moduli ne ho, compreso il 339. Continuate così, sperando che l'attesa non sia TROPPO lunga.
- 78 replies
-
+1000 for the Mirage III Does anyone know the differences between a french E and the spanish EE?
-
Suggestion for a chargeable MiG21bis II upgrade
Mig Fulcrum replied to Rosebud47's topic in MiG-21Bis
Is it still considerd? A Mig-21MF would be an incredibly versatile asset to make period correct missions and a campagns, considering the maps we already have and will have. And then if a MF arrives, i suppose it will come with the SM as well, as far as I know they are pretty much the same plane. I very very very hope to see them somedays, maybe with the much needed facelift and sound revamp to the Bis. Finger crossed -
You mean the morse code?
-
+100000 for a Balkan map But it would be very nice to have the north part of Libya too, so many missions down there: 1981 gulf of Sydra incident, 1989 Gulf of Sydra incident, 2011 operations, WWII North Africa OPS, Malta WWII... This way from a 1999 only map it become a +80 years old span map I know it would be a HUGE map but one can dream... Please
-
Very nice, will we be able to force NOT to use JHMCS? because right now we can dismount it in the ME but the players can re-equip it with F8 menu, and then we can only change it for NVGs, we can't return to the "nothing" configuration. As a mission maker I would love to see some way to force players not to mount it.
