Mig Fulcrum

Thanks for the answer! Honestly I did search, but i used the "search" tab but it didn't end up on anything. Sorry. But at least I think the more threads are for one topic the higher is the probability ED do something about it. I really hope to see some day a better ME, more user friendly and with less useless complications.

Hi, I wish to have in the ME two very standard features present for ages in almost every software. - Select multiple units or object by dragging the mouse and hold left click (classic drag select) - Ctrl+z to undo the last action (and Ctrl+Shift+z to re-do) These two simple commands would have save me hours, i'm not kidding, considering all the missions I've made in all these years.

Got it, thanks!

As the title said... Why isn't possible? Also a 3x R-530? Just wondering if it is a wiring issue on the real aircraft or what?

Thanks for the quick answer, btw I don't think anyone can notice the difference between a P-414A and P-414 so i think we can simulate a late '70s jet without being too anachronistic. It would be another story if we were talking about the P-412... I was just wondering if it was correct what is written in the manual.

I have a quick question. On the manual it says it will have P&W TF30-P-414A but didn't these engine arrived with 125GRs? The 95GR should have P&W TF30-P-414 (non A) as far as I know. but I could be wrong. I know it's a very very minor difference (we are not talking about P-412) but i wish to know if it's correct. nullThanks null

I really can't understand why anyone would pay monthly for DCS (or anything IMHO). Do you really hate your money?

Any update about it? The -95GR is my most anticipated variants of all, i love early tomcats. Of course we are talking after the release of the Phantom, but it has been 4 years since the A (late) came out. Just want to know how far it is now.

The coolest thinkg IMHO would be: 1) release the F-4 DCSG like it is now with ALR-46 2) release DMAS with the intended uprgades 3) revisit the DCSG with a late vietnam configuration (retain slats but modify RWR to a APR-36 and remove other "post-war" features) This way there are no imminent changes that cause delays but there is time to modify during EA. Just my opinion

Given the fact Aerges works on Spanish aircrafts i would very like a Mirage IIIEE or even a F-4C, perfect for vietnam

Falkland 2.0 The Revenge (c.a 1992)

Probably, but it's a bit odd since in-cockpit RWR doesn't really show the model like AN/ALR-36(V) but usually just the type of the screen like we have in the F-5E in game. It is IP-1310 for ALR-46 and IP-957 for APR-36, at least from my knowlege. Beside this, do you think that our DSCG with AN/ALE-40 and ALR-46 would be feasable as a 1974 platform? With weapon restriction of course.

Yeah thanks for the clarification. Every time I typed APR-46 I was meaning ALR-46. But still, the -46 is a more capable RWR being a 2nd gen and it show more information, not only "sticks" like APR-36 or ALR-45 (that's why i am confused about the F-14 too, I don't understand why you said ALR-45 was a much capable RWR compared to ALR-46. Based on HB screenshots that's a ALR-46: (even if it say APR-36 but they stated it was a typo, just to add confusion lol) And this is a ALR-45

Sorry, I don't want to be mean but I think you're incorrect. It's impossible F-4s start reciving ALR-46 in 1971/1972 since in thoose years the ALR-36 start to be mounted on F-4E (around 1969/1972) replacing the older AN/APS-107. Ultimately it's hard to belive that F-4 have the -46 so early when F-14 still have the ALR-45 until mid '80s. About DMAS I don' really know much about it so if you have more precise info or source about its dates it would be appreciated. Thanks a lot

As the title say... WHEN? I'm a little confused because HB stated the DSCG variant will be based on a 1974 configuration. But from my research it looks like the AN/APR-46 with IP-1310 Azimuth Indicator replaced the IP-957 with AN/APR-36 in Dec 1983, 9 years later. Also, it looks like the F-4E didn't get AN/ALE-40 before 1977 so the "1974" date HB told is even more confusing to me. I hope someone smarter can help me with my research or even Heatblur itself because all these equipment (AN/ALE-40 and APR-46) seems more logic for the DMAS (which should be around 1979-1980) but for DSCG would be better a APR-36, at least from my knowlege. Maybe 1974 is just DSCG upgrade from DVST?

Bump I would like to know if there is a true possibility to have a somewhat correct F-5E in game and not a "Swisserican" combo. I'm tring to do some research of every module in DCS and the F-5 really confused me about the date. From my research the AN/APR-87 arrived in 1979 to swiss F-5s but it seems very strange since AN/APR-46 (basically a worse -87) arrived on the F-4E in late '70s. A real american F-5E would not have any RWR at least before mid '80s but probably later (much later, like early 2000s) I may be wrong but that's all very confusing.

Meglio così alla fine, un ulteriore gioco da parte di ED avrebbe rallentato ancora di più il già lentissimo sviluppo di DCS

Well, Mirage 2000 doesn't really fit

Are there any news? with the upcoming Kola map this asset would be at home

Capito, sarebbe carino avere anche un G.91 (early) magari il preserie con relativo cockpit, senza DCU-9A e i miglioramenti avionici in generale però immagino sia una bella sbatta in più Questo cockpit per intenderci

Grazie della risposta Ne approfitto per fare una domanda che mi affligge da tempo: Il G.91R/1 che state facendo è un R/1A, R/1B o R/1 (classico)? Ho cercato informazioni riguardo le differenze tra le tre sottoversioni ma non ho trovato praticamente nulla se non che si tratta di aggiornamenti avionici e mi piacerebbe sapere se voi ne sapete di più, in particolare: - Cosa comportano le sottoversioni A e B - Relative date di entrata in servizio delle sottoversioni (l'unica cosa che sono riuscito a trovare è che il B era già presente a fine anni '70 nell'AMI) - Sapere se anche gli R/3 ed R/4 sono stati soggetti a questi update (se non ricordo male gli R/3 avevano un'avionica migliorata rispetto agli R/1, forse corrispondente all'R/1A?)

They already said something like a MF would be feasible but an earlier variant is a total new project and a different module. I think the PFM is something that other SH could cach too.

Ho avuto modo di vedere il G.91 ieri sull'altro sim civile e mi ha fatto salire una curiosità ancora più alta per questo aeroplanino su DCS. Se serve per avere un modulo buono e fatto bene sono ben contento di aspettare qualche anno in più. Era già un instabuy per me prima di ieri ma adesso sono ancora più convinto, detto questo prendetevi il tempo che serve, basta che l'EA sia piacevole come col 339 e che venga fatto bene, cosa che immagino ovvia. P.S: Magari dico una stupidata ma adesso che abbiamo in casa un G.91 volante potrebbe essere più facile ricavare informazioni, dati, SME ecc... e accelerare lo sviluppo.

Please tell me you haven't dumped it. It's probably the anticipated module i'm waiting the most

The Mig-21PFM is much needed IMO, but it MUST be a FF module