FoxOne007
-
Posts
594 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by FoxOne007
-
This sounds a bit fishy. You can always say/quote the source.
-
That’s not correct, the Bulls location is defined in Steerpoint 25 as per the above posted image and various docs (such as the M3 tape F-16 doc) out there (of which the image is based on)
-
Thanks!!
-
Interesting, so Bulls can also be input as MGRS, that’s nice!
-
@Wagscan you please confirm the MGRS capable steerpoint range, as STPT 25 is reserved for the Bullseye in the Block 50 -CM
-
We Want To Hear Your Ideas For A New Map In DCS!
FoxOne007 replied to danielzambaux's topic in DLC Map Wish List
Either one of these two area's: 1. Basically Afghanistan or 2. Iraq, Kuweit and a little bit of Iran
-
Another day, another update. This time about the 3D scan of the pilot body:
- 267 replies
-
- 11
-
-
-
Yes, they have every right. But this isn’t complaining anymore, this is a constant nagging to ED (buns lot of people) about something they have stated very clearly for about a zillion times that they’re not gonna do.
-
Y’all should really stop crying about this stuff. They’re not gonna change it, period. No point in whining about it further
-
BalticDragon (the guy from the Raven One campaign) is working on a realistic F-16 campaign on the Syria map The 3D model is more then fine, it’s the systems we need
-
Since ED is making a USAF/ANG version and not an export version that is gonna be a no too
-
Both are not planned/will not be coming
-
And here is the pilot's stick
-
Another update on the 3D model side of things:
-
Keep on dreaming then
-
Why would it be a problem, big chance it will fly completely different, the F-15C’s FM is no where near on par with one from any FF module. It’s just A flight model. I am going to assume the F-15E will have a much more accurate one since they will have access to docs and SME’s to help them make it accurate
-
Yeah no thanks! Glad it stays like a USAF/ANG one What you are wishing for a Frankenviper, something ED explicitly said they were not going to make
-
I’m a just bit curious why it has gone from something that is on the list when it got up for pre-order to, TBD…. It’s a rocket pod on a TER… not a super complicated system. (Not meant in anger, just general curiosity)
-
@Wagsor @BIGNEWYwill we still get the LAU-131 rocket pods as well, that were initially on the planned systems list?
-
Aaha oke
-
I would assume the HARM DL mode thingy is part of the HTS
-
A small update from Prowler
- 267 replies
-
- 16
-
-
-
You are correct, fixed it now that you mention it yeah. hopefully we can get them all fixed/adjusted
-
There are 3 bases on the map who's name is not 100% correct, they are the following - Incirlik - Akrotiri - Kingsfield They should be - Incirlik AB - RAF Akrotiri - RAF Kingsfield would be nice if they could be rectified
-
I hope ED realizes some time soon they should drop any and all effort in the way to niche WWII stuff that nobody except a handful of people want and focus the people that are being wasted on that on the actual important aspects of DCS like the DTC/Mission Planner stuff
