FoxOne007

Make sure you use a G or K model as they have Force Corrolate and put their seeker in Area mode, which allows for locking on buildings a lot easier

That's what OAP and MP's are for when they get included. You have a whole bank of empty steerpoints (81-99) you can use for TGT that won't be part of your flight plan. Somewhat similar to how you do it in the Hornet...

Targeting Hand Off only works for D and G models, as per Wags his Maverick video

I'm having the same issue (whenever I air start at least)

Can someone from ED please move this back to the bug section, as this is in fact a bug and not wish!!!

Just an FYI, the NVG behaviour is per IRL, as IRL the JHMCS sits over the NVG mount, so it is either JHMCS or NVGs, not both (unlike with the A-10C IIs Scorpion HMD)

Yes, I did

The bug is almost a year old and has been long fixed now

Fair enough, I was under the impression that it gave you a bit of a wider FOV (didn't know it was from Tarkov, never actually played that game). I'll remove that part

There are a number of liveries (including ones added in the latest OB update) that have their name wrongly formatted. It are the following liveries and are typed out how they appear in editor: - 132nd_Wing_Iowa_ANG_Des_Moines_AFB - 152nd_Fighter_Squadron_Las_Vaqueros - 174th_Fighter_Squadron_ANG_Iowa_AFB (This one is from the Iowa ANG, not Iowa AFB)(also flew Block 30's not Block 50's) - 77th_fighter_squadron (is missing the 'Gamblers' at the end that it used to have) - 80th_Fighter_Squadron_Kusan_AFB EXAMPLE of a correctly named livery in the mission editor: 13th Fighter Squadron 'Panthers' A small idea but it wouldn't hurt to have all these names a uniform naming format like: "Fighter Squadron/Wing" "Nickname", "Stationed Air base" EXAMPLE: 22nd Fighter Squadron 'Stingers', Spangdahlem AFB

Same goes for the HARM, but I think that this is intentional

At the moment when switching to NVGs the pilot helmet remains the JHMCS model instead of seeing the JHMCS removed and NVGs added.

In HAS mode, after having unselected radar emitters in the "SRCH" page of a table and then switching tables (both via HOTAS and OSB) the previously unselected emitters will reappear on the table. Steps to reproduce: - Unselect some radar emitters in the "SRCH" page and then go back to main HAS display - Cycle Tables - Should now see previous unselected emitters have reappeared (this results in the scan time to the longer time as well)

Welcome Zach, great to see a new CM!!

This is honestly a worse layout than what we have now, rather have a small but updated menu in the top than something that takes up the entire screen

That will be a much welcomed addition!

I think he means as in, pushing up the switch for shorter than the 1 second he describes above. so if you just quickly click it.

Exactly :D

And don't forget the TGM-88 ;)

Read the post above yours, never gonna happen thank god, CFT’s are hidious

Yes, the ARC-210 just replaces the old VHF AM radio

The HARM doesn’t generate coordinates either, only the HTS does. But re the solid lock box I don’t really get the whole issue with whether a box in your HUD is solid/dashed/or whatever I don’t think that it really matters/is important. All it indicates is the last known emitter bearing as located by the HARM, it will just be in the rough direction indicator and not at a 100% accurate position marking

I believe there is a keybind to hide/show it, but unsure what it is

Dear ED since you guys have caved to the quakers with pitchforks once again and decided to ignore SME's like Scrape (above message). Can we now get the GBU-54 for the Viper as well? It would fit great with the rest of the frankenviper..

My vote goes to ED moderators closing threads like these that request things based on a single test jet image that doesn’t indicate real world Operations