I find these discussions interesting. Some are saying no weaponry should be restricted at all and some are calling for some restrictions (for balance). One one hand I agree, don't nerf airframes too much. They were developed to be better than something, so let them be.
One the other hand, this could lead to ridiculous scenarios. i.e. say your opponents have to group together to take out a single F-14 because it has a way longer reach than them and can spam the airspace with AIM54 (or the F15 with AIM120C). I know a bunch of you are saying, well that's the way it is in real life. Here's a question for you
Would you, or would you not, play in the same scenario, but the entire enemy airspace is protected by multiple SA-10 sites and each SA-10 is protected by multiple Sa-15 / 2S6. So no matter what you do, you will get locked and launched on as soon as you go fence in and ARMs will get shot down by the SA-15. We have to balance MP in some way, else it gets angry-making.