Lieuie

I assume it's in case you have to abort the takeoff.

If they are not yet they will soon enough.

While there may be very little doubt that Heatblur are going to make the Intruder it might not be their next module.

Thanks guys. Really enjoyed it.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3661070&postcount=80

Just turning the HMD on and off I didn't have any issues as long as I didn't use the RECCE button.

Look at the description. At 33:20 they talk about planning to implement it.

Why are you mad at me? If it was in my hands the Phantom would be a priority. Both Navy and Air Force.

I don't have any problems with the operation of the AIM-9 using the HMD. The problem is that with the HMD active you can't use the radar to slave the missiles. The RECCE button was mentioned above by Revelation so I thought I would give it a try and I found that while the HMD wasn't displaying you still couldn't use the radar modes to slave the missile and also even if I later did turn the HMD off using the knob I wouldn't get a clean tone but it would pulsate. however if I don't use the Recce button and turn the HMD off using the knob I had no issues with the radar modes. Also the radar locks like normal. The problem is that the missile is not looking at the locked target. This is what I encountered and it looked to me like a bug but since I don't know how the HMD works exactly I thought that I would report it and ED can figure out if it is a bug or not. If it isn't they can just clarify how the system works like for example prioritizing the HMD over the radar. If it is a bug then they have just been informed of it and they can fix it whenever they are able to.

There are definitely some issues with the AIM-9M as well. First off it indicates that it is the 9L in the HMD but the 9M in the HUD. Also I tried to use the RECCE button and while it does toggle the HMD it doesn't slave the missile to the radar where as if I turn the HMD with the knob then it is possible to do so, unless I had previously used the RECCE button. HornetHMD9Missues .trk

I don't know if that's enough to justify Heatblur having to do the visuals and the flight model of the Phantom when ED has already said they are going to make them. I do get your point though and I would love to see Heatblur make a navy version of the Phantom if ED doesn't make one, especially considering it was originally developed for the navy.

I don't think there are enough differences between the air force and the navy version to justify making another module when ED have mentioned that they are making the F-4E. I just hope that they will include a navy version as well.

They did mention on Facebook that there are a lot of preview stuff coming our way but I don't know what that means exactly.

I hope I am wrong and it's in active developement. I love the Pacific theater and can't wait to experience it.

If I remember correctly it was mentioned by Heatblur that the pilot can't jump in the back seat in multiplayer. If that's true and jester AI is banned you won't be able to even start the aircraft.

Magnitude 3 was also working on an Iwo Jima map but I think it has been put on hold for now.

As the name suggests the Radar warning receiver detects radar returns it interprets what they mean and warns you accordingly. The AIM-9 is a heat seeking missile which means it doesn't have anything to do with the radar other than telling the missile where to look to spot the bandit. That means that the RWR can't detect a heat seeking missile. Some planes do have a system to detect them like the A-10 and I think the M2000 but the Hornet doesn't. Now when it comes to AI I don't really know but I am guessing they are detecting them visually. In my experience they do release countermeasures when you are on their six and have radar lock even when you don't have missiles like the BFM campaign for the F-5.

I really want to fly the A to see if it is as bad as they make it out to be. The great thing about DCS is that you don't put your life on the line when you fly in combat which means you can enjoy temperamental aircraft you wouldn't really want to fly in actual combat. We can enjoy the challenge. Most actual pilots probably didn't.

The B is the version we are getting first.

I believe that Heatblur should take as much time deems necessary I just hope that from what they have learned from the development of the Tomcat and the creation of new technologies that can be applied to different aircraft they can shorten that time. The truth is that as a community we are constantly wishing for new aircraft. That is the whole point of this thread. Each of us suggests or speculates which plane should be or may be next although we haven't even gotten the Tomcat yet. I think it's important to realise the difficulty of creating a new module but also have hopes and visions for this community. I am sure that Heatblur would have preferred to have been able to release the Tomcat in 2017. I am not saying that what Heatblur has decided is right or wrong I am just wishing then the best.

Let's just hope that the next aircraft (whatever that may be) won't take as long as the Tomcat for it to be released.

Get in contact with Heatblur. They will help you solve it.

Try a repair first and see if it fixes the issue.

Nice to hear that. Maybe they could release them in a bundle.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3648838#post3648838