.jpg.f748190cc2a90e4803d840f81d444125.jpg)
Rakkis
-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Also hopefully it will move away from the Mission Editor and into the Weapon Select Re-Arm/Re-Fuel panel, (with the limited information we have currently) it seems that's going to be a real limitation for the Multi-Player side of things, doubly so when Dynamic Campaign releases if you can't respond to evolving threats. -
Well Gentlemen, I regret to inform you I did not win the $1.55 Billion Dollar Mega Millions Lottery, so I will not be able to start a 3rd Party Module Development Company to bring the OS2U Kingfisher and the North Carolina, Baltimore, and Cleveland Class Ships to launch her from to DCS. Apologies.
-
I had high hopes, but those are dwindling rapidly.
-
I've been in the P-47 getting big American radial practice seeing that both Corsair and Thunderbolt use variants of the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp. I'm sure there are going to be stark differences but I feel having a healthy familiarity will definitely help.
-
I think bug fixes, a little facelift, AAR Probe, 4x AIM-9, and Maverick integration is a reasonable ask for $10-15.
-
Not sure about your first question, however regarding your second, Helljumper stated in another thread that he's working on updating the training missions but its very time intensive.
-
Great update, seems as though F4U is further away than many of us would have liked to hope, but thats ok. I'd rather a Christmas or beyond release with quality than a summer release with issues.
-
If they gave MiG-21 Kh-25MP anti-radiation Missiles I'd pay a hefty fee.
-
10/10 would day one drop $180.00 on a Ju-87 Stuka/Dauntless SBD/D3A Val dive-bomber 3 pack.
-
Not True, they teased an AI Zero over 2 years ago and have openly stated they will ship Corsair with a limited WWII Pacific Asset Pack. https://leatherneck-sim.com/2020/05/20/crouching-update/ "As we’ve mentioned a few months ago, our intention is to deliver the F4U-1D not only as a module but as an entire package containing a few more features, including an aircraft carrier and Ai units. Exact contents are not decided yet and they depend on many things, but apart from the Essex Class Aircraft Carrier we’ve been working on some ground units to build a very basic environment for the F4U-1D. A variety of such assets include the Japanese Type 89, Type 95 and Type 97 tanks, Type 94 truck (in a few versions) and the 25 mm Type 96 gun, 75 mm Type 88 cannons. A complete package of contents will be disclosed closer to the release date!"
-
If the idea is to have as many players as possible, wouldn't supporting another FREE High Fidelity aircraft, lowering the entrance fee, be more a boon than a hindrance?
-
With the latest iteration being truly fantastic, what are the odds of getting the eternally free community A-4E added?
-
Quiet in here for months, any breadcrumbs?
-
Why is artificial horizon so badly wrong at times?
Rakkis replied to imacken's topic in DCS: Spitfire L.F. Mk. IX
I'd be interested in your thoughts on the artificial horizon, I find myself ignoring it most of the time due to inaccuracy. -
I love the Catalina, I really do, but if you're looking for more than an AI asset I don't think we're anywhere close to where we need to be with the Multi-crew technologies to satisfactorily make it a full fledged module. For WWII SAR Missions, Anti-Sub, Artillery Spotting ect ect, I think the OS2U Kingfisher is more practical and achievable currently.
