Krippz

+1

Hi, The peer-peer datalink works in Single Player any chance we'll see this functional in multiplayer?

Bump: Datalink still has "false contacts" when entering another session. You have to close the sim and relaunch it to get rid of that, it's very frustrating. The Hornet had ghost contacts for a week and it was subsequently fixed. Come on ED....

I think people over estimate how good the A2G radar will be.

+1

+1 It would be nice to see at least 1 Eastern full fidelity fighter (i.e. MiG-29 or Su-27) the sim is becoming very sterile with the proliferation of Western full fidelity aircraft. People that want to fly Eastern-bloc aircraft are forced into FC3 and I don't think that's good for the sim.

+1

Guys RWS and SAM are both incomplete at the moment. Rather they take their time to fix, improve and flesh out existing features. They'll get to Link 16 in-time.

A singular focused aircraft like the F-15C would be nice. As we’ve seen with the Hornet and Viper multirole stuff takes a lot of time to get done. Plus the Hornet/Viper have enough multirole already.

The sim needs a modern Red-for aircraft (e.g. MiG-29, Su-27). We have enough NATO fast movers.

Any word from the developer on this?

Hi, Can you add fuel fuel for the MiG-29's in the Gun Area as well as the F-16. Thanks.

So your saying you identified a bug?

Can you show me where you were promised to get a feature on the Horner before the Viper? Because I’ve looked and can’t find it.

Why can't everyone just be patient and not try to burn the house down every time something happens that their upset about? I don't mean to be disrespectful but some of the outrage is very juvenile. There's loads of other features to be proud about and the feature that you want will come when it's ready, just wish the devs the best and carry on. At the end of the day this is the only combat flight sim that's on the market, cherish what you have....

Yes 1,000%. Do it!

I agree 100%

Would prefer if time was taken to diligently (not saying that it isn't) to work out the IFF instead of a temporary IFF that's being described. That in my opinion creates confusion for players and possibly bad habits when the "proper" IFF is realized.

The current sounds are placeholder. They'll be updated when they get around to it.

Very good to hear.

NineLine said last night in the DCS discord that visible oil leakage would be a thing with the new damage model when it’s available which is good news.

I think once we get the damage model rolled out it will help.

Good job guys. Look forward to the release. Best of luck in all of your future endeavors.

Many of the points outlined in the video are being addressed by the developer. So I didn’t really get the purpose of the video?

Really enjoying the Warbirds in DCS. The modeling is top notch. I know it’ll only get better when the damage model is rolled out. Keep up the great work guys.