Krippz

100% Agreed.

I think people get too caught up in the term "Early Access": I purchased the module knowing what I would get in terms of features at release, I was fine with that because I got the chance to fly one of my favorite aircraft early. So if the cost of admission for me personally was just the features listed at inception then I would have been fine. I'm fine with them taking their time to get complex features done; I have over 1,000 hours in the Hornet already, I got my money's worth.

Agreed. Thanks Wags and team for the clear concise communication. I look forward to seeing the Hornet develop.

Hi Wags and team, Good roadmap. Love the communication and clear projections from you guys. One thing that I'm really keen on along with others is the inclusion of missing HOTAS features discussed in this thread:

Yeah I'm pretty sure that isn't from a NATOPs manual.

Really enjoyed the event. Thanks for putting it together! S!

P-38 please.

Squadron Name: 64th Aggressors Contact Discord ID: Krippz#6204 Aircraft Selection: F-18 Pilots: USA - <64>Krippz

LTWS should not provide any weapon steering as described earlier. I know you should be able to launch the missile onto a datalinked contact but I don't know if the version of AMRAAMs that we have support that or not. With respect to RWS to TWS transition, there's some missing HOTAS logic; hopefully ED adds that at some point.

Not fixed yet.

<64>Krippz - F-14B <64C>Fox - RIO

This level of detail should really be done for the other modules as well. Wonder if HB have an RWR API they could share with ED.

Agreed.

Nice write-up. Thanks for sharing.

<64>Aggressors would like to switch their registration to the F-86 if allowed because of the Sabre pilot shortage.

I agree but that doesn't reconcile with it being lower than the Mirage. They're both relative size.

Compared to the other aircraft in DCS the F-16's RCS is relatively low: In-game the RCS value are the following F-16's RCS Value = 4 F/A-18C RCS Value = 5 F-14 RCS Value = 6 Mirage-2000 RCS Value = 5 F-15 RCS Value = 5 Su-27 RCS Value = 5.5 The low RCS value in the F-16 allows it to easily notch missiles: https://streamable.com/1i4vf I can understand the Viper's RCS being lower than the F-15 and Su-27 but lower than the Mirage-2000?

Confirming my attendance

If you're referring to DCS it does in single-player. If you're referring to real-life the Su-27SK has P2P.

[NO BUG]Peer-Peer Datalink Does Not Work in Multiplayer Attached is a track showing peer-peer datalink not working in multiplayer (it works in single player). server-20200310-154111.trk

I would much rather the dev focus be on the A2A Radar. Klarsnow is a real world operator and if he’s telling you in so many words that A2G Radar is over hyped and not the killer app you think it is you might want to listen to him.

Would be great if we can adjust the angle of our mirrors instead of the fixed position that they are currently in.

<64>Krippz F-86

Yes that's because the resolution of the TGP's back then pale into comparison to what we have today.

There have been numerous pilots and WSO's in this community when asked state that there is no use really for a/g radar apart from SAR mapping at low altitude. Today's air warriors primarily use the targeting pod.