Krippz

Yes separate team.

64th Aggressors <64>Combz <64>Fox - RIO <64>Krippz

How do you know if the undercarriage and or wheels of the L-39 or C-101 are able to land off-road? Do you have any proof to back up your request?

<64>Krippz - F-14 (Pilot), <64> Fox (RIO) TAW_Savior - M-2000C

Hi, I see the log that you attached but not the track. Can you include a track aswell.

Great post!

Awesome video.

The same can be said about the F-15C if we ever get one. They have to model things that they are allowed to model. Flaming Cliffs level of fidelity is a turn off for a lot of people....

You have crew chiefs in this thread telling you that they never loaded it and never trained to load it and you still want it? It’s a slippery slope to make concessions like that because when the next plane comes along people are going to look at the precedent you set and ask for an unrealistic configuration.

They can only do what they have approval and docs to do. I think initially they were going to do a F/A-18A and then only later were able to do the Lot 20 that we have now. If we want Red-Air stuff I don't think we can be picky. Have to just accept what we get and buy it so they can do more.

Really hope we do get a MiG-29A. Red-for is suffering really bad.

Awesome video.

Let's get the hype train going: :thumbup:

I think that's unreasonable considering the amount of things being added to the upgrade.

I think the OP brings up valid points.

Thanks for keeping us in the loop Mike. :thumbup:

There's a bug where the DT2 doesn't get midcourse guidance. This has been reported already.

<64>Krippz MiG-29A

Okay!

<64>Krippz 64th Aggressors Squadron USA Good luck!

Hype.

I agree that across the board DCS needs to move away from dice roll for counter measures. I think big picture the EW environment needs to be improved (Hornet, Viper and Tomcat are immune to jammers), RWR picture is too good across the board and TWS is widely used in the NATO jets: any pilot would tell you that they wouldn't rely on TWS the way it is in DCS. If the above gets addressed the gap would close a bit.

<64>Krippz - F-14 Pilot <64C>Vati - F-14 RIO

That’s like saying we should have stopped at the iPhone and not have continued to iterate it.

I don’t get what you’re getting at. Are you advocating for modern missiles to remain bad so you can use certain planes and missiles effectively? Because last I checked this was a simulator not a arcade game where values are artificially tuned for parity.