Jump to content

ChuckJäger

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    253

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ChuckJäger

  1. ChuckJäger
    @Bignewy this is an example of the messaging that hasn't sat well with me. Of course the public were brought in to this - as they should have been a product that was in EA was/is in jeopardy of being discontinued due to, allegedly, nonpayment by company it was being developed for. This is alarming, full stop. Now that you have removed the products from the product page, I really feel as if a some sort of message is necessary from your legal team. I am really beginning to wonder if the 56 licenses I hold in your store are sound. Since 2018 - ED or it's partners posts something for early release, I am generally there on day one- that is not the case anymore... this is absolutely going to effect your business short of some sort of clear understanding for your customers. I am really not one of those bitter keyboard warriors - looking through my post history hopefully says that... I am just very, very, very concerned.
  2. ChuckJäger
    With the script, could you have it play a sound file of a thud? As a pilot, it is quite possible to have a bird strike and not even realize it. If it went in the engine, you'd absolutely know it though...
  3. ChuckJäger
    @NineLine The constant comments about how you can't/will not make public statements to your customers as this is a legal matter isn't sitting well with me. You have repeatedly said it... the reason it doesn't sit well is, it is not because you can't do it, it's because you won't do it. You could ask your legal team to draft update(s) that would inform the people that have paid for these modules. It REALLY feels like the lack of information from ED is a conscious management decision in the hopes that this will just go away as ED continues to bring features and new modules. It feels dishonest. Giving ED the benefit of the doubt, I'm sure that is not the intent. This has been going on for over a year now with not even a shred of hope for resolution for the people that enjoy both Razbam's and ED's modules. My hope is that the two legal teams can get together and provide an update and outline a path forward for the people that have invested their hard earned dollars to enjoy these modules. A good resolution is only going to make this community stronger.
  4. ChuckJäger
    LOVE IT when someone bumps a KC-10 thread.
  5. ChuckJäger
    Really hope the comments from Prowler are a sign of good things to come. I love the F-15E and I am so hopeful it ends up being a finished product. The Harrier is such a great aircraft too. Healthy Developer/ED relationships really make this community grow! It's nice to finally see something optimistic!
  6. ChuckJäger
    Bump
  7. ChuckJäger
    that did it! Thank you!
  8. ChuckJäger
    Man This is awesome! I cannot load them though - I may be doing something wrong. Your first round of templates worked great for me - but when I load these it will not allow me to save the mission (saves as 0kb) or let me in to "fly mission" in the ME. I've tried different variations of missions, to include new missions entirely, and nothing works. I've even gone and deleted outposts one by one - getting rid of them all and it doesn't fix it. What could I be doing wrong?
  9. ChuckJäger
    It would be so cool to have some strike/cas missions that originate off of a carrier in the North Arabian Sea now that they've expanded the map out that far. I did a test run yesterday and at high altitude you barely notice the undeveloped part of the map... it looks convincing for being over the Desert. I am trying to put something together myself but mission building is not my expertise...
  10. ChuckJäger
    Hello - I just purchased Iraq and I cannot run it. It loads (both CH47 and AH64D aircraft) and then immediately crashes to desktop both on multiplayer and SP instant action missions. I was waiting for it to be a little further along but after a few youtube videos I figured I'd give it a go, now I'm wondering if that was the right decision. dcs.log-20250110-171615.zip dcs.log-20250110-172034.zip dcs.log-20250110-172322.zip dcs.log-20250110-172820.zip
  11. ChuckJäger
    +1000000
  12. ChuckJäger
    I feel like it may be time to wait, I have pre-purchased almost every ED module - After the drama and the game of brinkmanship that's been played with my money between ED and the other developer, I just don't feel comfortable investing more until I see more in the way of ensuring that my investment will be sound in the future. I love ED, ED's product and the capabilities we have with it - I am very, very excited to see where it goes.. but after more than 15 years of using this sim, I am worried given the last year. I know I'll get called a troll, I'd invite anyone who thinks so to read my other posts on this forum. I usually feel like it's best to keep my opinion to myself but the silence here has been deafening.
  13. ChuckJäger
    this thread is going a bit bananas and missing the point. At the end of the day the community needs some reassurance from RB and ED that this matter is moving toward a resolution, end of the story.
  14. ChuckJäger
    I think you are wholesale misrepresenting Early Access. It's 'at your own risk' because you are getting what could be a potentially bugged product - but it's marketed as a working copy of a more complete product down the line. No where in the EA model, to my knowledge, with ED does it say it can just disappear and that is wholly on the buyer.
  15. ChuckJäger
    I worry if asking for a refund at this point (this is only my perspective) makes matters worse. The whole of this issue seems to be based around payment to RAZBAM for a product that they claim they haven't received. If all of us go rushing in to get our money back, then they definitely will not be renumerated for the work they did. This is a mess, and with the recent posts from the youtubers (CASMO, HIP, Spud) who brought me to DCS - I wonder if it's not a glimpse into a significant issue with this model as a whole (DCS.) I have purchased just about every module that has hit the DCS store, and I'm beginning to wonder if I can trust that these purchases were sound as the future for DCS seems a little shaky. To Spud's point - there needs to be some resolution or some joint statement that there is progress being made. This is so unfortunate because it was just getting really good......... I believe they provide a store credit.
  16. ChuckJäger
    Purchased, I am too concerned about the Razbam side of things - just for what it means for this community. With that out of the way - the Spec Ops aspect sounds interesting… I am curious @BIGNEWY when we can expect to see just what that means… will we be inserting/extracting SOF forces behind enemy lines? Does that entail a rework of ground forces at all? Will some element of this be implemented on release day? This opens a whole new, exciting dynamic in DCS that I am absolutely looking forward to!
  17. ChuckJäger
    Having an issue where in the middle of a flight the Foveated rendering suddenly stops working. I've got Quadviews companion running in the background, it works initially and then boom - I have to move my head to see things clearly after a while. Any help would be appreciated!
  18. ChuckJäger
    Honestly I had no idea how much that kneeboard would be utilised. I cannot wait for this feature to show up in other modules. This is truly clutch in VR.
  19. ChuckJäger
    +1 Still hoping for some love on the Tankers.
  20. ChuckJäger
    I've heard it's best to buy the Pimax through amazon. Seems like a safe way to enjoy this headset and save some headache should you want to return it. Switching gears to the positive... I cannot wait for the Kiowa or the Chinook.... DCS is fulfilling all of my helicopter dreams! Looks like some exciting times are ahead for us in the DCS world!
  21. ChuckJäger
    KC10 Tanker bump. Would love to get gas from something other than the ole' KC135......
  22. ChuckJäger
    I think we broke the DCS Store…
  23. ChuckJäger
    can. not. wait.
  24. ChuckJäger
    I haven't noticed this before today's patch - but the TGP model appears to be stuck in a forward looking position - even though it's working fine in (moving) in the cockpit. Sorry, no track file this time.
  25. ChuckJäger
    It must be close, ED's new policy about keeping the hype train on standby until imminent release and all....
×
×
  • Create New...