DerFangzahn

Sure! Only spamraam should be on par with the SD10. God forgive that other redfor planes have competitive long range missiles. :no_sad: This is no MP shooter. This is a sim. :smartass: Thats the true reason why EDs buffs the spamraam as soon as a competitor is available. Spamraam needs not to be worse than SD10. Must buff, must buff,...

Great, and now get the rest of the long range missiles on par with SD10. Not only the mighty spamraam

1.5-2 year for the F18 and it is still in EA. And it will not leave EA for a long time. This is NOT a new module. Same for the Harrier, Viggen! Go to the shop. the first page is full of EA modules and none of them is near to completion. :music_whistling: This is fine in your opinion?

Priority changed because ED had to throw an EA Supercarrier on us. "Sorry guys that Hornet and viper got delayed. But 2020 we will finish them. We promise! For sure!" Mid summer: "Exclusive EA to the new developed module {insert random plane}" Sound familiar? Look at the shop. Basically all newer planes are EA. Not a single one get finished. I for myself decided not to buy any EA modules from ED anymore. Which technically means I will not by any module from ED. Because new modules never leave the EA phase. Sorry, but I have serious concerns that this business model is sustainable on the long run.

Under normal gaming load 200-300w will not be hit. Only during stress tests with an 9900k on 5GHz+. So I dont see a problem using a quality air cooler over water for daily use. Casefans help with the hot in air in the case. :thumbup:

If you want to overclock your CPU the 3800 is maybe worth the extra money. 3800 silicon is a bit better. With a bit of undervolt and a good cooling you can overclock the 3800 maybe better than the 3700. If you dont want to OC take the 3700 and enable PBO. Done! Intel I would avoid at the moment due to power consumption under OC and security flaws.

I would go for the 3600. You get basically all the CPU power for good money.

Great idea. But no the main issue. Finish your products ED and put them out of early access. Basically all planes are EA and get frequent updates. Planes which were released 1-2 years ago are still EA. Hello Hornet. Hello Harrier. No surprise that everyone is on OB not on stable. This is the results of starting that much modules without finishing them. ED was warned about that by the community several times. No other SW uses such a strange environment like DCS where beta is the main release. Stable is for what? No its not. It is your main release. Not a test build. If ED likes it or not. People play mainly on OB.

This issue is present on the TDC axis when using the warthog. Even if you exchange the ministick of the warthog this issue is present. Actually it is not of topic. The topic is that RAZBAM is unable to solve issue which exists for year. I have really high hopes for their upcoming projects. :disgust: NOT!!!

Maybe be crashed after 12+ hours. Not his PC. :)

Makes the issue even more ridiculous. RAZBAM is able to proper implement the slew on the waypoint but not on the Tpod. Stunning...

Support of the mini stick of the warthog is completely bugged out on the harrier. This is the case still the beginning. Never got fixed. Does not look like Razbam cares about this.

9400 is good as long as you stay on 2D. VR is another question. But then still your GPU will be the bottleneck.

If you take the Intel 660p 1TB NVME drive. A cheap QLC drive with SLC cache. They give you 5 year or 200 TBW guarantee. On the 2TB drive its even 500 TBW. So if you do not write tens of GB on a daily basis to this drive. What a standard gaming user will not do. The longevity of this drives is more than sufficient for everyone. You do professional stuff on the drive? Sure get a premium MLC drive. But for a gaming disk? Na... The money I but into a better graphic card.

Hi, Basically it is completely irrelevant if you use a cheap SSD drive or an overpriced Samsung EVO Plus+++. Its basically a waste of money. And if you ask yourself SSD vs. NVME? Tl;DR Any modern SSD will do it and you will not notice a difference in day to day use. Save the money and put it into a better graphic card and check if your RAM is large enough. Cheers

Why does nobody mention the viggen? Superb A2G platform with funny and capable systems. And with some restrictions you can use it also in A2A. And you get 3 full campaigns with it.

temporary fix till ED solves the issue. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3307342/

Did I get it right that with the new update an additional campaign was added for the viggen? What campaigns are currently available for the viggen?

Please dont!!! Disabling HT will do nothing if the system is GPU bound.

We are talking about military secrets here. So if ED does something which the russian government does not like ED closes its doors faster than you can count to 3. So as long as there is no bulletproof agreement with rus gov ED will keep silent. Easy as that.

Small side question. What tools do you use to manipulate or create dds textures?

The clear glass mod for the SU25T did remove this reflection completely. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3303852/ Is this a possible interim solution here? Anyone fit enough to implement this?

Some customers find it boring as f... to perform the same procedure again and again. That is reason enough to include it. Everyone wh o does not want to use it. Dont use it. For others it will help.

Does this mod still work? For me it seems to make no difference in regards to to clearness of the HUD glass.

So in MP mission designers will always have to use two carriers. The Supercarrier and a standard one for the guys which dont own the SC. Odd situation.