DerFangzahn

I will help a bit with load times in MP if large missions with a lot of unit are running. You will not experience a massive fps boost. But memory is cheap at the moment. Buy now! Soon memory prices will rise again.

So how should this work in MP? I need to own the Supercarrier if I want to land on it on a MP server? Or is it replaced with a standard Stennis if I dont own the Supercarrier? Do I need to own the thing to connect to the server? You are absolutely right. WW2 scenario is severely impacted due to the fact that the asset pack is a separate module. It should be at least be part of the Normandy map and not be sold seperate.

Till now 120c outperformed R77 by far. And this was till now never an issue for anyone at ED. So why should it be an issue if SD10 outperforms now the 120c? Only if ED has a problem that now all their Nato modules are outperformed by a 3rd party eastern module. Will be funny how they explain this "Balancing". :lol:

This need to be a release requirement by ED. Otherwise the module does not get released. Done

Cheering developers while they release more and more incompete products does also NOT help. F16 EA was a joke. When ED takes my money I have the right to tell them what is not ok in my perspective. Next EA is hopefully better planned. Thats my perspective.

Used 1080ti or 5700xt

If you upgrade to a 9900k it is a noticeable performance upgrade. If it is worth the money you must decide on your own. If you upgrade to something below a 9900k it is a waste of your money. Amd offers far superior bang for the buck in every aspect. So upgrading today -> Amd Or wait till Intel is forced to lower their prizes or offer something with value.

Any chance to get A4 and SU25A supported. Would fit in timeframe. thx

Got mine from https://vroptician.com/ for the Rift S. Work really well.

If your only task is to update it to 2.5 and bring it to a playable state I dont see any reason that you need permission for a free campaign. As long as you redistribute it in the ED user files and mention the original developer you are good to go. Btw. If these guys are not around anymore. Who should ask...

TDC axis control is still not working correct. In full extension the TDC hangs.

Sorry, but please do not recommend the T.16000 set. I got it. It worked, but it is cheap plastic all around. The pedals are so narrow that you can not use them for fine adjustment. The axis of the thrust unit sticks like hell. Stick is the best of all three parts. But still it feels like a toy. The WH is in any way the superior product and worth the money.

Because it is as irrelvant as any other benchmark. If you want to know the performance in DCS you need to run DCS.

Is there any official answer in regards to the head position and HUD issue on the A10C?

You need a good hotas with pedals before you can start with VR. So TNWH.

My main issue with 2D headtracking is that it is massively disorientating if you do fast head movement. I miss completely the position and vector of my plane in relation to ground. Or when fixing a plane during a dogfight and trying to maneuver your plane competent. How do you guys handle this? Can it be trained? In VR this is more easy. But VR has its own flaws. Thanks

Are you at the May 2019 update of win10? As I understood it the may 2019 update with Retpoline should give you the performance back without sacrificing your sec. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Windows-Kernel-Internals/Mitigating-Spectre-variant-2-with-Retpoline-on-Windows/ba-p/295618

I like it a lot. But sadly I get a lot of stutters when running the mission. Usually I get short lag when a new global message comes up. Has this something to do with the scripting in background?

Hi, I am currently running a 6700k with 32GB @ 2133MHz. I am curious if DCS will benefit from an upgrade to 3200MHz memory. When I check benchmarks different games do benefit from ram speed. I am asking myself if DCS is one of them. Anyone had experience with such a topic? Thank you! Regards

Actually its both. You can choose between sim and arcade in your settings. :smartass:

Had the same issue yesterday. MFUZ OFF was the issue. By the way. If I trigger the laser. How long is the target illuminated? Thx

Hope you find the issue. I am experiencing the same problem from now and then. 20fps with ~50% GPU load. CPU no where near to a limit. My system is the same except the GPU which is a 1080ti. Like I am experiencing that this effect comes and goes randomly. Do I understand you right, that you get this issue only in VR. For me its only existing in VR. 2D is fine

Hi guys, Just went into VR and I am asking myself if VR is really a thing in MP. Sure, it is immersive but the performance is atrocious. Especially on MP server I get a lot of issues. SP is most of the time fine. So do you guys prefer VR or head-tracking in MP and is it somehow playable? And a question to the experienced dogfighter. What is your feeling. What is the better solution for dogfighting. VR or head-tracking? Thanks

I know that. But even if someone sits in a green suite in front of his monitor and talks funny. DCS is a GAME. A sim game. Yes, but still a game. If the developer does not want to artificially restrict his customer base he has to find solutions which help the gameplay. All that stuff like VR, hotas, trackir, custompits,... is already that clumsy and impractical. If they want to sell their products gameplay needs to improve. Not much people are that crazy like us and invest thousands of [input random currency] to get their thrill. Most people are sane :)

Fully on your side. Main sim core improvements and feature updates (AI, dyn. campaign,..) are the thing what brings the game forward. Not starting every month with a new module. So Vulkan got at last some priority?