Avenger31

Yeah, I totally agree with the statement that Lightning is much superior to the new Sniper pod, I compared it and even with XR I can't have a clear and close image like with Lightning Narrow/9x. I think it needs more refinement and that in the future it will be what it claims to be state of the art

Would like to know this too, waiting for the answer.

@BIGNEWY have you tried it yet? If you did what is the best thing that is coming with it and we dont have it now?

Told you all, on fsexpo winwing will just let us to wait next few months till release Cyber Taurus. Yeah was good to see lot of new producsts but we will wait more.

+1

Me too, but I saw no progress in that mod for a while. But still I hope that someone will do that mod in the recent future.

At least some mod???

I hope it will be soon, or I will go for Moza ab9

Any news/rumors when CT will be released?

hnks o Ian Boys and his awsome work with marked positions, I've managed to add some units on placable sites, and also found in some free resources positions of NATO deffences, I am sure that I am missing a lot but at least just wanted to help little. CWG WITH MARKED POSITIONS AND SAMs.miz

+1

I remember a time when this forum community was very helpful to us who encountered a certain problem that was not that common, and even when others did not have the same problem and could not reproduce it, they tried to help. Now certain issues simply go completely unnoticed and without any desire to help each other.

Me too, something weird with the update or I am just a dumb?

If they have already decided to work on the F-35, for which 70% of the data is probably secret, and for years they have been telling us that certain aircraft/helicopters or even weapons cannot be worked on due to a lack of available data, then it would be fair for them to patch up that lack of data for other aircraft with a desire for additionual money, as is the case now. I think that with such a policy of lowering standards for the sake of additional money, it would be expected that in the near future we would get an upgrade of the F/A-18C to the F/A-18E/F, the F-16C block 50 to the F-16V block 70 or as standalone modules, I'm sure there are people like me who would pay for them. They removed the AGM-154C from the F-16 because that weapon doesn't belong to the time frame in which our Viper was made. I understand, then lower the standard for that too and add a few more weapons that don't belong to the given time frame and that we would all like to use on the Viper. We also shouldn't forget the Red players, so with the existence of online documentation, YouTube airshow footage, we could make some more FF modules on the red side, so that we have at least some balance. Now that we are in the period before receiving the Dynamic Campaign, in which logistics will be one of the key elements, with these standards of documentation from the internet, YouTube and similar sources, they could make the An-26 or An-30, they are not modernized aircraft that they need more than what they will make the F-35 with.

+1

Dynamic campaigne for sure “beyond” but faaaaaaar away in beyond realm. They have to work so hard on core in future period to make DC available in any time 4+ years from now. Ground units behavior is more than awful, also 3d models of soldiers, transporting of troops something that works only on luck, somethimes does and mire of the time NO JOY! So whatever will come in this hear it is more than welcome but DC wont be here. I personaly waiting for C-130 to be released in this year and Balkans map to be announced for some time in future, will be happy even knowig that they will work on it.

They decided to ruin what they were working on fo decade. RIP DCS

Agree, we need true slopes nit just images

+1 For real scenarios we need this bases

Please ED do Diyarbakir AB in Turkey

Anyone can check if dots gone after todays patch? I am far away from home so cant check myself. I know that sometimes they don't write everything in the patch notes, either intentionally or unintentionally, so I hope that maybe they worked on the spotting dots situation, even though the entire patch is primarily intended for campaign improvements Thanks

Sure, when I saw how buggy they are and hard to use, just go back to good old mouse

SOLVED! Reset Meta account, than again make it to work in developer mode and hands are back.

I have it enabled, I am doing everything just with hands without controllers out of DCS, but now there no trackers/hands options in dropdown menu. But I remeber there was that option and I have tried it but turned it back on becouse I have my F-16 cockpit and there no need for using hands in vr. But few days ago I bought CH-47h and wanted to try hands tracking becouse there no key bindings for CDU, and discovered that option has gone.

Under VR tab in DCS while I have my headset on