cercata

Of the actual products, I'd recommend Samsung Oddysey or Oddysey+ Yes, 1440p but LCD, that has RGB subpixel pattern, and gives sharper image than other panels with 1600p but PENTILE OLED displays, like Oddysey or VIVE PRO.

It's not a settings problem ... When you are on VR, then what you see it's like 9 times bigger than in a monitor, it's like if you had 9 monitors stacked 3x3. So for seeing it as sharp as in a monitor, you would need 9 times more pixels. Also you need higher FPS ... you notice much more low FPS. So on VR, we measure resolution like in human eye vision, in PPD (Pixels per degree). Then the PPD are a function of the screen resolution and FOV (Field of View). For car sims, I thing I'd prefer wider FOV than the almost standard 110º diagonal FOV we have on most actual HMDs. But for flight sims, I would stick with 110º FOV, and increase PPD. Until HP Reverb launches this month, no one has tryed it with DCS, but I guess that with a good graphics card will be a game changer. Still not as sharp as in monitor, but awesome. What graphics card will be needed ? We'll see ... So, in your case, I think HP Reverb is the best option. Anyway Rift is out of stock, and Valve Index doesn't launch until June, so wait for feedback on DCS+Reverb

What % of your gamming time do expend playing DCS ? What other games do you play ? Valve Index and Rift S are gonna be nice VR devices, the best for gamers, but for flight simmers, if you have a beffy PC, and your IPD is in the average, HP Reverb seems to be the best option, and it's suppoed to launch on April. I play with Rift now, and I'm inside DCS, but with a little burred vision. In other games it doesn't matter to me, but in DCS for instrumens and spoting/identifying planes, it would be amazing to see it sharper.

https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/1/18291013/valve-index-vr-headset-product-page-early-launch-date Display Port 1.2 confirmed, so they can't have more than 1600p at 90Hz. Still will be probably the best and more balanced HMD, if we take into account tracking quality and controllers, but for DCS I thing HP Reverv will be better.

I have discovered this tool, it's still Beta, but it's really amazing. You can generate missions, edit them after, they have even some spoken radio messages. You have lot of options, but it's really easy to use, just pass throght all the tabs, and select a value from each list. You have also a tool to generate custom radio messages, it uses the text to speech from windows, and then adds the radio static, and it gives very good results. https://hq4dcs.com/

It happened to me on the F-5 when using Low res Textures, I had to use High res textures. It seems belsimtek used untralow resolution for the textures on low settings

Pues sí, sobretodo pq en el F-15C, creo que nunca me ha salido un amigo marcado con rectangulo, o sea, que identifica siempre bien a los enemigos, y no debería ser así, si sale alguien con circulo, es 100% seguro que es amigo, pero si sale como rectangulo deberia significar solo que no estas seguro de que es amigo. Entonces eso es que el IFF no falla nunca y que todos los aviones de tu bando lo tienen, y en ese caso no tiene sentido que por ROE al F/A-18 le pongan que hace falta doble identificación.

Revientor, tienes que probar esta herramienta, aunque no te interese para hacer misiones, el editor de mensajes de radio que trae es facil de usar y los mensajes quedan muy bien: https://hq4dcs.com/

There isn't an English Thread ? I want to report a bug, when you select the "F-5E Tiger" in a player flight group, the "F-5E" is set, but that's an AI plane, an "F-5E-3" should be set. Edit: I see it has been reported and will be fixed in hotfix 1. Amazing tool !!!!

Ese post me ha parecido muy interesante, como que parece que lo de que la identificación de enemigos esta hecho así a proposito en el F/A-18, para minimizar las posibilidades de fuego amigo, por ejemplo un avion aliado con el transpondedor IFF dañado, que sino nos saldría como hostil. ¿ Como lo entendeis vosotros ? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3866946&postcount=2 "With the current ROE implementation, you need two sources of information to identify the target as hostile. If you don't have donor information, they'll have to be a Mode 4 interrogation and a valid NCTR print. For NCTR, you also need to be within correct angle limits, 30 degrees off the turbine axis max."

Don't trust too much today's leaks, it's april's fools ... RGB, isn't it ??? That would be amazing, and HMD future proof !!!!

Hacedlo cobrando ... así seguro que no hay trolls. Lo digo en serio ehhh, una formación en condiciones yo creo que se puede cobrar. Y se puede hacer reembolsable, que si luego con el tiempo la persona aporta al grupo, por ejemplo formando el a otro, se le devuelve la pasta.

Me ha dado por curiosear lo de las 24nm, ya que en el F-15C te identifica los amigos desde muy lejos, y no parece que el cacharro real tenga ese limite: http://www.designation-systems.net/usmilav/jetds/an-apt2apy.html#_APX https://www.baesystems.com/en/download-en/20180518194500/1434555671810.pdf Hasta 100nmi segun las especificaciones del Fabricante, y parece que es el que monta el F/A-18

Es curioso, el mig que va a la izquierda parece que le afecta la deflagracion, pero el de la derecha como que solo le llega metralla. Al principio pense que pq iba mas lejos, pero en el momento del impacto ya parecia que habia recortado y estaba a la misma distancia ...

Ahora entiendo pq el Ejercito del Aire desarrollo su propio IFF para el F/A-18 Español !!! :lol::lol::lol: Menudo jaleo, miedo me da ponerme algun dia con el F/A-18

https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/1/18291013/valve-index-vr-headset-product-page-early-launch-date Display Port 1.2 confirmed, so they can't have more than 1600p at 90Hz. Still it will be probably the best and more balanced HMD, if we take into account tracking quality and controllers, but for DCS I thing HP Reverv will be better. Original Post:

No creo que se refieres a dar datos personales, sino a decir los nos nicks siemplemente de la gente lo hace

Yes, but the Cities, etc, you must choose time period for the modeling

Yes, I started with this mapping: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3150178/ And then added somethings that were not mapped, like the dial of the fuel gauge, the deposit opening for refueling, etc. For the radios/COMMs menus and Cameras (F1-F12) I use voice attack. No need for keyboard anymore :)

Maybe because real pilots and who planned their missions, didn't have a button to get a new life and a free plane, and didn't take too much risk. And I'm also talking of the guys launching the missiles, maybe their goal many times is just to scare the other one and make them turn away, and avoid a conflict ... even if you win, it can be a political incident. Yes, we all believe you know more than ED and Heatblur about misilles and how to model then in a simulation !!! :megalol::megalol:

It's not so different from the AMRAAM, once shoot it follows a fixed path to the point where it has to become pitbull. Optionally, it has the option to be updated by datalink, but it needs the plane to mantain the radar lock to send those updates.

Ya veremos si eres tan habil como Zandi :P

En serio que hay gente que se pasa horas haciendo como que es novato y haciendo como que aprenden a volar, para sabotear un proyecto ??? :cry:

F/A-18C Aggressors BFM Campaign by Revientor :pilotfly: Me esperaba un dogfight sin mas, y menuda sorpresa !!!!!! Animo con lo de los sonidos, seguro que consigues dar con un efecto de radio impecable, y luego ya una vez que sabes ya no te costará tanto hacerlo. Facil no tiene que ser, ya que en la campaña Bear Trap de ED no suenan muy bien, mucho peor que en las de Baltic Dragon. PD: Otra idea para un video de la serie "Con R de Revientor": https://www.wearethemighty.com/history/iranian-tomcat-kills-3-jets

It has the lenses and screen of the GO, so we can start with that ...