cercata

Juegas sin VR, no ? Yo cuando cambie de la 1060 a la 1660Ti, le quite el MSAA y AF, pero le subi bastante el PD, y no veas que mejor, por ejemplo el HUD del F-15 lo leo sin problemas y antes me tenia que acercar.

Yo es el único canal en Español que sigo de tema aviones, luego el de Growling Sidewinder, y el Air Combat Tutorial Library Bueno, y el mundo de la aviación, pero ese no es de juegos. Pues a veces con el tiempo, la cosa pierde gracia, por ejemplo en el canal de Heikki360, sus videos del principio me gustaban mas, se le veia mas naturalidad, mas ilusión, etc ... A seguir mejorando, pero produrando no perder la naturalidad, ilusión, frescura, etc ;)

Yo estaba parecido, incluso mas limitado que tú, 120W máximo me podia consumir la tarjeta, y me he pillado la "GIGABYTE GTX 1660 Ti Mini ITX OC 6GB", y no va mal para DCS en VR. Segun comparativas va muy parecida a la 1070: https://www.gpucheck.com/es-eur/compare/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1660-ti/intel-core-i7-6700k-4-00ghz-vs-intel-core-i7-8700k-3-70ghz/ Pero me sorprende que no puedas meter una 2060, solo son 10W mas de TDP que la 1070

Do you know some other software that can run this kind of simulation with Better performance ? When I started with Flight sims this year, i was thinking, I hope they optimize DCS to make it run as fluid as IL-2 ... Now I think that's not posible on DCS because of radars, misiles, speeds, etc. It needs much more power for it's simulation.

Nadie por aqui usa la Standalone con Oculus ? Yo no puedo ayudarte que estoy con Steam

Yo pensaba que las campañas en nevada no molarían, al no ser reales, y me compre el mapa mas que nada por ver las Vegas, El gran cañon, la presa hoover, etc ... Me dio por probar la Red Flag del F-15C, y la verdad que me gusto mucho, eso si, me quede con ganas de hacer ataque a tierra en alguna misión, que siempre de escolta me parecía que lo mas guapo lo hacían los F-16 y los F-15E !!!!!! Lo que sería muy guapo seria un campaña con el F-18, F-16, F-14 que empezase en nevada, con varias misiones de entrenamiento, y derepente surga un conflicto, y te manden para el golfo. Sabes si hay algo asi ? La red Flag del A-10C caerá .. si algún dia consigo aprenderlo, que todo el mundo dice que es muy dificil y mejor empezar por otras cosas.

Sadly I would say it's a fact, not an opinion. Despite de lack of IPD adjust and headphones, the rest of HMDs launching this year are worst or very expensive. I just ordered an HP Reverb, but I guess I'll keep my Rift CV1 for playing non cockpit games.

Gracias. A ver si las actualizaciones del Hornet no te rompen la mision ;)

Relax !!!! Before thinking on porting the "new night lighting tech" to other maps, they have to finish it first, polish it, and when it's validated and works well, they'll be in a good position to make the estimation of how much work it's required to bring that to old maps.

What I'll miss are some analog instruments from the F-15C ...

I agreed with everything you said about the F/A-18 except this, I think it's a great place to end. I have started with FC3 & F-5E, now I'm gonna go with trainers (L39 & C101), later I don't know, and then I'll Learn & Master the F18 I have it already, because I bought it in a Bundle with the Gulf map ... but no rush

Aprender el Mirage ayuda a apreder luego el F/A-18 ? Yo es que el Mirage en si no me dice mucho, y me daba pereza pq no doy a basto para aprender tanto modulo ... le tengo ganas mas que nada por las misiones de Baltic Dragon.

Yo me suelo esperar 1 dia o 2 ... Aun cuando se recupera Steam, a veces mi banco rechaza los cobros, pq tienen un volumen de transacciones tan grandes de Steam, que alguna IA deduce que Steam ha sido hackeado, y lo pone en la lista negra de tiendas online ... A DISFRUTAR DE LOS MODULOS NUEVOS !!!!

Hey, muchas gracias, no creo que le hinque el diente al F/A-18 hasta dentro de uno o dos años, pero cuando lo haga esto ira al piernografo fijo !!!!!!

It depends on what you want ... You want to be actually inside a plane, and enjoy flying ? Or you want to be more lethal playing a video-game on a retina resolution "Window" ? Looking at your 6 is not confortable in VR, but it's the same than in a plane ... it gives adtional inmersion.

75% de descuento ?? Que locura ... a ver si vuelven !!!!!

Exacto, y no solo la instrucción, sino el incentivo de volar juntos ... Compramos el Smart-Copilot, y me iba a enseñar a pilotar el 737, pero no nos funcionaba, con la Baron 58 sí, pero esa ya la conociamos los 2. Ademas a mi tambien me permite jugar a algo nuevo en DCS, hacer de instructor ... y putearle con la capucha, jeje. Por cierto, que le falta al Multi-Crew del C-101 ?

Yo quiero pillarme el C101 por partida doble, uno para regalarle a un colega y asi meterle en el mundo de DCS ... Y el Cristen Eagle está tan barato, que no me llama mucho pero da cosa no pillarselo.

I looks that for Quest games it's already a reality !!!!! I hope it will come soon to PC, in all APIs, or in OpenXR at least. For HP Reverb that would be really great !!!!

That word was totally necessary, because they just say it's a big update to the map, people would start asking if it was a paid update. So there is no posible excuse to get angry at it

Interesting tool The impact depends on what the threads do, and on it's memory usage patern. The "matrix calculations" is an extreme example of what gets hits the most with thread bouncing. There is also data sharing between threads in that case. Project Lasso is an amazing tool, but what it does should be really integrated into Windows, because any change on the windows Scheduler via update risks of breaking your system completly.

That's what I did exactly, fur for others processors maybe the optimal is different: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3832369&postcount=216

There is a config file where you can set you core affinity for DCS ... I have it for 2 cores, that gives me the smoothest gameplay. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=118535

Once I watched a presentation from Naughty Dog, and how they organized everything in Jobs, that were serial tasks. Once they knew the dependencies and shared data between jobs, they asigned those jobs to different cores. That aproach is brilliant, but they can do it because they know the processor where it's running, and they know what cores are available for them. If windows had a Game mode, were a process had 75% of the cores, and the rest the remaining 25%, and it had an efficient way off creating threads, and assigning them to "virtual cores", DEVs could achieve something similar. If there a more "virtual cores" than "real cores" available, then the scheduler should find a way to map it, and assing several virtual cores to a real one. But Windows doesn't has that ... so DEVs are fuc_ked :(

There is a huge impact, because each time a thread awakens on a diferent core, he has lost his L1 and L2 cache data, and it has to load it again from DRAM ... That would be True if the Windows Scheduler was smarter ... I don't know if still happens on matlab, but back in 2013, Matlab solved a Matrix Inverse faster forcing affinity to only one core, that if I let him use the 4 cores. And if you looked at the task manager, all 4 cores were almost at 100% utilization ...