Terrorban

No, those type of game modes attract kids and idiots.

Let this thread die please. At this point there is nothing left to discuss and now these fanboys are jumping in looking for arguements. Can we lock this thread now?

Certain people are really salty that this jet is so good. Time to vote fix the threads :thumbup:

I have no arguments against your data. It is just when you began comparing the performance with how other missiles behaved I wanted to clarify if any of that influenced your reasoning. Furthermore, I know that Deka has responded to this issue but where is ED’s response? Would love to get all this sorted out so we don’t get used to one thing and then it changes quite late. I’ll be honest, I still sweat salt when someone jumps in here demanding the missile be nerfed because it is overpowered without explaining much.

So ultimately you are guessing it’s current behaviour is incorrect due to how the most comparable nato missile is designed since so much of its internal working is unknown to you and general public? Not dismissing your research but just trying to understand how much of the data provided is exactly from SD-10 and how much is filled gaps using similar but different missiles.

That makes sense. I thought it would just blow up the aircraft like something from a James Bond movie. :lol:

I am curious. Where do you plan on using that feature? Just for luls? I can imagine if you have to bail out due to system malfunction but not wanting the jet to fly forever. I just want to know what your reason is. :smilewink:

Is it possible to refuel the fuel pods with rearming/refuelling function? I always drop them before landing but would love to land with these on if they actually refuel. Just adds more realism.

I completely agree with you there. However you do have to look at the capabilities of the developer in this regard. The features provided in this jet are on par with F/A-18. There is another certain developer who attempted to do a modern jet (which can hover) and we all know how that development is going. Their fans (including me) will just be happy to get the features implemented rather than complain about their realistic accuracy. The main thing which is bringing people to this thread is because they want multiplayer balance so when they get taken down by a JF-17, they quickly come here to vent their anger. Deep down they fear that ED will not fix the AIM-120 anytime soon so they are attempting to get this missile’s performance reduced. That said, I also appreciate the attempts of people who can provide reasonable data to back their claim than just calling the missile out of this world tech.

Let’s not forget that developers have a whole team working on these weapons and features so when one person comes here throwing big paragraphs around on how something is wrong, they are claiming that they have more knowledge than the team who developed it.

And yet this is the closest thing we have to a realistic missile behaviour and range when compared with AIM-120. Hard to believe, I know.

Yet you bothered to reply without taking a moment and think. I clearly said DCS community and DCS fans in my original comment. I doubt the community exists only in this forum. Anyways, I will not argue any further. On another note, @Top Jokey, The biggest limiting factor of the jet in dogfight is the fuel limit. Afterburner really drinks the fuel and you wont be keeping it on for much long.

Mate, just because you have your scope so narrow, don't call me a liar. If you read the comments on youtube, watch streams, listen to people on discord, as well as pre release forum discussions, it is quite obvious what I am saying. But this just proves how guys in this forum just spam paragraphs without having any idea what is what. Anyway, lets stick to topic and not start an arguement. Like I mentioned earlier, I have been following the development and now I am looking up on tutorials and discussing the jet with people online. There is quite a bit of negativity attached to it but now with more people owning it, it is dying down slowly.

I apologize then. I know about this bug but I thought he was talking about the overall performance at low speed.

That rocket bug was fixed before release. Additionally, I really think that people underestimate the performance of this jet. :)

I didn’t just see it coming, I followed the development ever since I joined DCS 2 years ago. The thing is, everyone is hating on it because it was designed to be a replacement for F-16 for Pakistan. So it makes sense that it would have similar or better performance in certain aspects to that aircraft. This point is hard to accept for most people. Certain you tubers are even calling it cheap version of F-16. Currently in DCS community, it has fallen victim of USA vs China political fight. A lot of Americans will be quite negative towards anything Chinese right now. You can see that with their replies and the wording they use to describe it. It is a very capable aircraft in DCS. Deka has done a really good job simulating its performance. The fact that it can carry so many different weapons and each one of them has been simulated to the best of their ability should have been all the DCS fans should have asked for but there is so much negativity towards it. It confuses me.

Thank you. I really appreciate an official clarification in the matter.

Prove it. This whole complaining without doing any actual proper research and then writing paragraphs of information in forums where facts are mixed with misinformation is a joke. I am done defending. These guys want a simulation where each jet is as capable as back in vietnam. I'm out.

DCS Open Beta Build always seem to update on Wednesdays. According to the developers in "Poor looking inside (cockpit) vs the rest parts" thread.

I am really enjoying all the features and functions of the JF-17. There are so many little quality of life things modeled in this plane. It really shows how much care Deka has put into the development of this module. Very good work.

While Hornet carries 10 spamraam and takes off from carrier with Litening Pod on, F14 is popping enemy jets from 70nm, and F16 is getting AGM-154B which does not even exist. Nato jets get away with a lot of "realism" problems without much complaints but an accurately modelled missile from another nation is suddenly a risk to the realism of DCS.

I cannot speak for Deka but personally, I think that the cockpit textures will be improved some time in the future. The current ones remind me of the old textures for mirage with broken lighting.

I apologise for the way I explained it before. It just bothered me when I watched their video, they were being quite negative about the module. Mostly discussing graphics being bad but not explaining any of the features that are available on launch. It looks bad because they consider themselves to be worthy of getting a review code however they have no idea at all about the development of this module, the features available or even the aircraft itself. Ultimately, this is a forum. If someone post anything here, it will be reviewed by people. I will admit, the startup video format is very clean and professional this time round. I am glad that they have improved their format. Stay professional GR :thumbsup:

So when I change my loadout after landing, the data cartridge does not load new information. After inserting the cartridge, the ALL button or any other button in DTC TRANSFER ... page respond.