The Falcon

Do you think pilots base their maneuvers on feelings? if they did not see the horizon and had no instruments and relied on their sensations they would be almost dead :sleep:

Believe me feel the force G is not something you would like to be possible. I believe that what you are looking for is the simshaker.

ED remove immediately :doh: seriously? do you even have time to make easter eggs?

I think we should consider the loss of performance due to intel's security flaws, so I don't know but I believe that in this case amd is the best choice, especially if intel's performance losses affect the single core

I saw many F 16s (Italian version) taking off, I don't think they were the 40/50 models, it was midday and sunny, well the afterburner was clearly visible and it was a yellow ball like the sun :)

Why not 29 and 27?

And remember, we will really see results only when ps5 slim or something like that comes out, that is when the sony studios will show us how to use the new vulkan, rtx technology etc ... the rest is rumor or Azure AI

:)

+1 finally

https://www.mudspike.com/mudspike-ama-with-eagle-dynamics-senior-producer-matt-wagner/

Nice:thumbup:

free for test and review :D

I was thinking of the speeches made earlier about creating a new DCS 3.0 from scratch. I state that I am not a computer programmer but I believe that the main things that need to be changed/added/modified are the general operation of the sim and optimization. Not everything has to be remade from scratch, many of the things are already done only have to be perfected and inserted in a new core. I hope i got it right.

Let's hope :cry: i believe in ED more than any other sim :v: and in a new DCS3.0 :egg:

This is at least the second time I hear this in this thread Have you realized that sooner or later it will have to be done? do you want to continue spending on modules and then find yourself in a abandoned DCS due to lack of funds? As I said earlier, I suggest ED to do an investment and make DCS 3.0 redone and make to pay for it, then they can continue to build new modules. While working at DCS 3.0, 10% of the staff will continue on the current version. It's just my fantasy? who know:helpsmilie:

Remember, Tornado is not a choice, is a must :)

Modders need support:book:

+1 for all except the annual pass, just 100 bucks for DCS 3.0 and ED will recover the investment. And for those who are wondering what they will do with dcs 2.5, it's simple, they'll leave 10% staff to fix small bugs :)

Heatblur :music_whistling:

Heatblur :music_whistling:

And that's why I talked about investment. Maybe it will be my mentality but if I were in the ED place I would think about it. Sooner or later they will have to update the code or they will close their doors and what will remain for us? What will third parties do? will they update their modules in time? meanwhile we have paid. I would like to have answers for the future because for now they are going on day by day. Maybe that's why the guy who did the video asked the heatblur and microprose to make their own simulator, maybe some competition could make ED understand the right way ...:shifty:

I suggest ED to make an investment. Complete the 18 and 16, adjust the night flight and the main things then stop to build from scratch DCS 3.0. It could take years but I think that most of the community would agree, meanwhile you will show us the progress day by day. Obviously a DCS 3.0 will not be free but this is not a problem I would still be happy to buy it rather than buying more and more modules in EA to then wait for years to be completed.

I believe in a completely redone DCS 3.0, I hope it won't take years and I hope that after finishing the F18 and the F16 they will concentrate only on the simulator and not on other modules.

Does anyone have screenshots to compare xtal with reverb? otherwise it is only personal opinions..

Carry the aim120 or aim7 on the wingtip pylons involves problems of maneuverability in the roll due to the mass/inertia also cause a greater stress in flexing the wings.