S.E.Bulba

Возможно ли сделать опцию поиска всех сообщений какого-либо пользователя в конкретной теме (разделе)? Сейчас имеется возможность выбирать тему (раздел) для поиска, однако в опциях нет поиска сообщений от такого-то пользователя.

Yes you are right. The Mi-24 pilot has the ability to fire unguided weapons either individually from the left or individually from the right. At the same time, one should take into account the peculiarities of aiming, due to the limited number of ballistic characteristics of weapons embedded in the ATsVU analog-digital computing device (IIRC, for example, on the Mi-24V only for the S-5KO & S-8M rockets and for the YakB-12.7 & GShG-7.62 machine guns). That is, if you have different types of rockets hinged on the 1st and 4th weapon stations (S-5KO and S-5KP, respectively), then, for example, when firing rockets, you can first launch the S-5KO from the 1st weapon station in automatic mode using the ATsVU. Then switch to the right side and launch the S-5KP rockets from the 4th weapon station, switching to manual mode, introducing ballistic corrections into the ASP-17V gunsight. AFAIK, no. From time to time, only the JTACs were used, who corrected the attacks of the Mi-24 by radio.

Are you out of your mind?! Apparently, you did not even understand the meaning of my phrase, but already in a hurry to accuse me of some kind of "racism"!

So what's the difference between "maximum sighting range" and "maximum effective range"? Personally, will you be able to install an "another" machine gun or an "additional" sighting system on the Mi-24V in order to increase the maximum effective range? I see that you either really do not understand, or you don't want to understand anything. I'm not going to change my mind, and even more so I'm not going to apologize to anyone. Besides, I'm not going to continue this stupid and senseless argument with you anymore.

You still can't calm down? In my opinion, that conversation has long been over thanks to the intervention of the forum's moderators. And nevertheless, you persistently continue 'to beat the air'. I am not sure that Google Translate will allow me to translate my question in the most understandable way, but do you understand what is the difference between "maximum (ie limiting) sighting range" and "maximum (ie more) effective range"? Do you even read what they write to you? One gets the impression that you are talking to yourself. So this is how you imagine the tactics of attack helicopters when attacking enemy positions, etc.? It's funny. "The end." ©

"My"?! Can you quote? So it was not you who wrote the following? I have no desire to discuss your 'compositions' with you, because I have no time to enter into meaningless disputes with forum's sophists. I just want you not to distort my words when you refer to me. To do this, the forum has a 'Quote' function, which apparently you know how to use. I did not talk about the invulnerability of helicopters, I talked about "reach" in the context of the fact that IRL it is very difficult, almost impossible, without anti-aircraft sights to hit by small arms an aircraft moving at a speed of ~250km/h at a distance of ~1000m. If you wish to prove otherwise, then I look forward to your proof. Frankly speaking, it would be interesting for me to see how you will show miracles of heroism, trying to aim from the AKM/PKM and hit the helicopter at a distance of ~1500m, at the moment when, for example, a sheaf of S-8 rockets is flying at you.

Since you referred to me, I have to clarify that this is not entirely true. Literally, I wrote the following. The maximum sighting range (NOT effective) means that the range of the KPS-53AV reflector sighting station is 200–2000m. Accordingly, as I mentioned above, the YakB-12.7 range tables for 12.7×108mm cartridges are also compiled at a ranges of up to 2000m. Shooting from the USPU-24 gun emplacement (YakB-12.7) at a distance of more than 2000m is considered ineffective because of the too large dispersion of bullets, as well as because of the difficulty in visually adjusting the aimed fire. IRL, the maximum effective firing range of the USPU-24 gun emplacement (YakB-12.7) on the Mi-24V was ~1000±200m. This made it possible to effectively inflict damage to the enemy (with minimal expenditure of ammunition and maximum damaging effect), while remaining out of the reach of small arms of standard caliber.

Do not divert the conversation away from the questions asked to you. I ask you again: besides an infinite number of empty words, can you provide any real evidence for your statements? I have to ask you again: can you quote allegedly 'my' words that you attribute to me? Or will you continue to use your fantasies as ad hominem?

Again, just words. That is, in fact, you cannot provide proof of your words? That is, you cannot give quotes allegedly 'my' words that you ascribe to me? Therefore, everything that you have written is nothing more than your personal fantasies?

Stop doing demagoguery. Can you prove your words? Can you quote where I wrote this? By the way, here I was mistaken because of my forgetfulness. The maximum sighting range of the USPU-24 gun emplacement (YakB-12.7) using the KPS-53 reflector sighting station = 2000m (when using the VSB-24 firing and bombing calculator). 1500m is the recommended maximum sighting range without using the VSB-24 firing and bombing calculator (for duplex rounds = 1000m).

Радиоменю – это своего рода «костыль» для общения игрока с ботами. Для радиостанции, как для технического устройства, совершенно пофик – кто у игрока РП. Поэтому если игрок оказывается в зоне действия той или иной КВ/УКВ-радиостанции, то почему эта радиостанция не должна появляться в радиоменю? Существуют задачи, когда нужно взлететь с одного аэродрома и приземлиться на другой (при этом «другой» по задумке создателя миссии может походу поменяться). Каким образом предлагаете игре угадывать мысли создателя миссии?

Авианосцы – это конечно хорошо… однако когда уже в конце-концов РП на ППБ «вылечите»? Заколебал он уже своей работой «по системе ниппель» – оттуда можно, а взад нет.

@PilotMi8, ЕМНИП один вопрос всё же остался без ответа. Или оставите это для сторонних разработчиков?

Зато у Вас в статусе волшебная надпись «Команда ED», дающая +100500 к «экспе», а это уже не «Простой смертный».

@Самсонов выше показал как обстоят дела у простых смертных.

Судя по-всему тоже никак, если Вы не админ или модератор.

Написанные «при старом режиме» судя по-всему никак. Посты, написанные на новом движке – в правом верхнем углу поста нажимаете многоточие, и в выпадающем списке выбираете функцию «Изменить».

These are your fantasies. I get the impression that you either do not read the interlocutor's messages at all, or you read very fluently, and at the same time you do not want to delve into what he writes to you. In your opinion, I must provide documentary evidence of your own words?! LOL. And by the way, for some reason you did not provide any documentary evidence that the YakB-12.7, at a distance of up to 2500m, penetrates the armor of any APCs of the 1980–1990s, regardless of the angle, while maintaining its destructive power. You wrote the following, right? For heaven's sake, leave your tone policing for someone less sophisticated. I expressed my opinion whether you like it or not. At the same time, I did not receive answers regarding the technical side of the question, in relation to the Mi-24V. On this I consider our discussion with you to be over.

Имелась в виду чисто техническая сторона вопроса, а не тактическая.

In my opinion, in the above quote you invented my "hostility" for yourself. The difference between us is that I do not write anything at all, except for what is written in real documents, and even more so I do not write any "fantasies", as you have deigned to express… while you often try to convince inexperienced readers that, about which you actually have a rather vague idea, based only on your personal speculations, usually far from reality.

For example, if you install an telescopic sight on the Utyos, then you can try to shoot someone at ranges up to 3000m… and nevertheless, the fact that I once shot quite well from the AGS-17 does not make me a 'marksman' from the GUV-1. I must admit that in most cases I am not very impressed by the stories of various 'Finnish snipers'… frankly, I personally would like to hear more about, for example, how many flight hours do you have on a Mi-24V as a pilot or operator? Or, for example, stories about the specifics of firing from the USPU-24 gun emplacement using the KPS-53 reflector sighting station, etc.?

Насчёт ИИ-пилота/оператора @Dzen уже ответил, а насчёт проблемы изменения шрифтов при вставке текста в сообщения, то это вряд ли исправят по-причине того, что это такие особенности форматирования нового движка форума. Есть два решения проблемы: При вставке скопированного текста в сообщение с помощью ПКМ выбирать не функцию «Вставить», а функцию «Вставить как обычный текст» (т.е. без форматирования, в котором этот текст был в источнике); Если всё же решили вставлять с помощью функции «Вставить» (или случайно выбрали не ту функцию), то в таком случае внизу сообщения автоматически появляется запрос «Вставлено в виде отформатированного текста. Вставить в виде обычного текста» – нажмите подчёркнутое, и форматирование сбросится.

Благодарю, добрый человек! Насчёт [Ctrl]+[C]/[Ctrl]+[V] я откровенно говоря не сообразил, всё мышкой пытался цитаты переместить.

By 'booster' did you mean the rocket section of the missile? In the Russian-language military vocabulary, the missile is usually divided into 2 main sections: the armament section (warhead) and the rocket section (rocket engine, nozzle block, empennage unit). If I understand you correctly, then yes – all Soviet modernized S-8 rockets (marked with the letter 'M': S-8KOM, S-8OM, S-8TsM, etc.) have the same 9-GSch-4421 rocket section. At the plant, the rocket sections are connected to the armament sections, and the rockets are supplied to the armed forces already assembled. The S-8 rockets of the first modifications (not marked with the letter 'M') had a different rocket section, but they have already been discontinued. I believe that purely subjective observations. For example, personally, I have had cases in the DCS World when S-8KOM rockets fell around the car, but did not destroy it (only its 'health points' were slightly reduced), but at the same time 'died' infantrymen who were away from the gap of the nearest rocket at a distance of up to 50m.