golfsierra2

... 8, ....9 ....

Counting incoming files : 3...., ... 4 ....

The time left for submitting your race track file is less than 11 hours. If you haven't submitted your race track file yet, now it's about time to do so. This is the last reminder. Submission time ends tonite at 24:00 hours local German time (UTC+1). Good luck to all participants ! Race Control

The time left for submitting your race track file is less than 11 hours. If you haven't submitted your race track file yet, now it's about time to do so. This is the last reminder. Submission time ends tonite at 24:00 hours local German time (UTC+1). Good luck to all participants ! Race Control

"Yes, I want to buy that carpet, please"

Took me 2 minutes and a jigsaw to built it - well, it fairly matches the description given by Axion... :smilewink:

Of course, use one like this

1. Both 2. By priority: TIR, pedals, beer

No bug, the AFM for the T-Toad is designed that way.

The World Wide Web is available since about 20 years, and has seen a lot of web sites coming and going. Innummerous web pages with a very wide range of topics have been created by many many people since then. Countless hours of manpower were necessary to do so, but none of the very first web pages have survided , not as far as I know. And, sadly enough, a lot of the effort, time and money spent to create that web content is now lost, because the web sites have gone offline and vanished. The Lock-On community for example has seen lockonskins.co.uk and Teka Teka's web site come and go, but they are lost now. Wouldn't it be nice to still have access to their content ? You may agree with me, that many of the webpages already vanished probably were not worth to maintain them, and a big chunk of all the webpages has been preserved by such great achievements like the Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org) or the initiative to save the GeoCities web content started by Jason Scott's Archive Team [http://www.archiveteam.org/). The concept of the web migration platform even goes one step further: Instead of archiving web content, it would be a straight forward approach to find new web hosts for web sites, that can no longer be maintained by their owner / creators due to various reasons (e.g. financial), or those owners are not willing to maintain their web sites any longer because they have lost interest in what they were providing. By this, web sites can migrate and live on instead of beeing archived as a dead piece of information. This could apply for example to squadron web sites with their valuable download sections. So I came up with the idea of announcing web sites / web content to the public, so that others willing to share available web hosting capacities can keep that web content online and by that available to the world wide community of web users. The web site "adopt-a-web.org" is maintained as a non-profit, non-commercial project, ad free. Please contribute to this idea by offering your available web space. Thank you ! http://adopt-a-web.org

1. Could be. 2. To be sure, test it or 3. write an email to vyrtuoz@strasoftware.com who wrote TacView.

:drunk: :thumbsup: :punk:

So in FC 2.0, AI pilots will be limited by the SFC and cannot 'outperform' human pilots that easy than it happens now ? And if so, using the SFM also for AI, would that have an impact on the CPU load because of more calculations going on for the AI ?

Only one track file was submitted so far, and beside that the answer is a friendly 'no'. If I did so, those who have submitted their track (one time submission) would have a disadvantage then, because other pilots would have a reference time and could try long enough to beat this time. So no, there will be no reference times given. Just try often, try hard and if you think 'that's it, I won't get any faster' submitt your track file.

Good luck, I understand and there is nothing wrong about it !

A question came up in the Russian forum concerning a belly landing in Kerch to save time: No belly landings, like it was in the qualification. Land with your gear down. Best regards, Race Control

Никакие посадки на фюзеляж, как в квалификации. Земля, нормальная с вашим механизмом вниз.

Found something unclas on the web to better explain it. Inside the corridor, own aircraft (fixed and rotary wing) move from A to B and vice versa, and SAM won't engage them (WCS WT). Outside this corridor, generally spoken SAM would engage everything not positively identified as friend (IFF) In reality, it is somewhat more complicated but that should give you the right idea of what the purpose of a corridor is in terms of military airspace structure.

I don't really understand your corridor thingy... SAM (GBAD) normally is used for asset / point defense, and the deployment layout depends on the size of that asset, geographical consideration, threat direction and the threat that you expect. Again, corridors are used for safeguarding friendly aircraft, not to shoot down enemies.

Killing Floor (whatever that is..) 833 DCS:BS 823 Come on everybody, the voting ends on 8 January.... http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/features/52220/Voodoo-Extreme-Best-PC-Game-of-2009-Voting Yes, we can !

http://games.gamepressure.com/game_info.asp?ID=14288 They show LOFC 2.0 available as of 29 January 2010

AI capabilities are overmodelled anyway. They always fly harder turns, fire their missile from doubtfull aspects but with high lethality and can accelerate faster. Hopefully they will perform more realistic in FC 2.0

There are different SAM systems around, some with a search and a tracking radar separately and some (like Patriot) where search and tracking is combined in one radar. It only would be safe if you take out all the radars: If the search radar is gone, the tracking radar still allows for limited search/surveillance capability and firing a missile for those systems with two radars (HAWK e.g.).

Even a used TIR 4 will give you a better tracking due to a larger field for the sensor. Yes, definitely buy one.