S77th-GOYA

LOL. How many copies of the High Fidelity Training Device for active Fighter Squadrons would you expect a dev to sell? :lol:

I disagree. Sufficiently lethal would mean that real world tactics work with at least close to the same lethality. It is very frustrating to work for a very good launch position just to see the missile fail miserably. Please don't take people posting about realism they want to see in the F-15 to mean that they think the Russian fighters/missiles are modelled correctly.

It's not "our" A model. Which version of upgrades?

Which version of A-10 is that?

Two incoming TWS bugged bandits close enough for a double kill is an online F-15 pilot's dream come true. At least it used to be.

F-15 and then F/A-18 And I'd like to see a Su-27 that supports the R-77.

It rarely pays. And you don't set yourself up for repeated disappointment.

And if there are a pair of bandits? Why do you say that?

And all we're saying that that opinion is very much not grounded in fact or even sense.

I would bet against any 3rd party devs for DCS. And I've never seen one scrap of information that would support that ED is even considering that.

There is no single tactic. It depends very much on the situation. But in a perfect scenerio, fly @ angels 16-18, use TWS mode, only jam when necessary and never when firing, fire 2-3 missiles ~ 5 secs apart at the bandit from 12-15nm (closer seems to not work as well) hold lock until ~ 10nm from bandit (unless that feels suicidal) and then get out of danger. And when I say "feels" it truly is a feeling and I have never really thought of a way to say why that feeling is triggered. Many, many hours of online stick time is the only way I can suggest to get it.

"Frustrations" does not equate to "not getting kills". And I've heard from you before that you think you know my tactics. I can assure you that you do not.

I fly the 15. I use AMRAAMs. I got tired of the frustrations and am taking a break from flying LOMAC. I installed 1.02 and might start flying that. Check PM.

A poll will give people's opinions whether they have been brainwashed and sworn to loss of freedom of speech or not. It's ED's customer base, why not ask what they want?

T, I suggest you save the 169th mission and study it.

I realize it's your wish and not mine but do you really want ED to spend the limited amount of resources they might have on something that community modders can give you?

Not the A-10? :smilewink:

1. Missile performance. (ALL missiles) 2. F-15 TWS center on primary 3. Correct FM for ALL planes That's all that REALLY matters to me. And missile performance outweighs the others by a LOT.

My interests are in LockOn, not DCS. That may change in time. As for now, if a question regarding this forum can't be answered in this forum then I can do without an answer. Thx, EB.

Certainly there are folks who would like to see the 25T added. It should be an easy addition to the new engine already having been worked out in the LOMAC engine. Is ED's position that if you want the 25T, buy FC?

Can people only see their own warning level now? Any other changes that aren't plainly apparent with the new forums?

Yes, as I undersrtand it, the utilization of DX10 in Bioshock was very small. I played the demo in both DX9 and 10. Not much to tell them apart. Also the upcoming addon for FSX has little improvement over DX9. At least that I've seen in screenshots. It could be that DX10 isn't all that great or devs haven't quite got a handle on its capabilities yet or fully utilizing DX10 puts too much strain on current systems or something else entirely. We'll see. And Crysis seems to be the big hope.

It was past time for ED to cut bait on this code and its limitations. (And its ties to UBI) But I do think its customers are due a final patch. F4 modders are working with very old sim and why can't LOMAC modders work with a newer sim. There are still people modding for Jane's WWII Fighters. The fact that the dev no longer provides support makes no difference.

I don't think STEAM users are a good representation of flight sim customers. We tend to keep our systems stronger than average. We have to in order to get the performance we expect. And in a year's time, anyone who doesn't have a DX10 card will be well behind the performance curve even if the game they play is DX9. And remember that ED is planning a new module every 9 months. (I think it was 9) DCS is going to be around for years. Rgr that.

So ED is not planning to EVER update the code to utilize multi-core and/or DX10? Or are free patches planned to upgrade older modules to any new code features? I realize this is a new thing but it seems to be what ED is going to stick with for years. Surely they have planned for the future and what its customers will expect. And it could easily be argued that without multi-core support, this new engine will be obsolete before its release.