=4c=Nikola

I cannot login at all.

Sometimes life (or a game in this case) doesn't offer such opportunity. :D Joke aside, it looks really nice.

Lol, He will be dying in a nicer coffin. :lol:

He asked for DCS, not RL comparison.

tables designated with 3 and 4 are speed vs load factor in stable (sustained?) turn for different altitudes, with 50% of fuel, 2x r73, and 2x r27, at standard temperature. Table 3 is for max dry power, and table 4 is for max AB. At table 4, hidden line indicates overload area while long red lines indicates area of "volatile instrument readings". Correction for different aircraft mass is: final load factor= initial load factor * 20000 / mass of aircraft. Tables designated 5 and 6 are predicted altitude lost in recovery from different initial speeds, dive angles and for different load factors during recovery, at idle power, with 2x r73, and 2x r27. Follow red line. Table 5 is for speed brake closed and table 6 is for speed brake open. Just a note, all fuels are given as "50% of normal amount of fuel", which doesn't necessarily mean 50% of fuel tank. Maybe it is, maybe it is not, I don't know.

What type of starter M-2000C engine has?

Absolutely.

@raptorsim: That video is useless without meteo conditions and load configuration. In DCS, if you take clean eagle with 30% of fuel and set best density altitude, you can reach 45-50k ft with the profile from the video (about 60 degrees climb after runway acceleration).

Better be feared of R-73 off bore capability. :D It's by far the most dangerous feature of flanker during a dogfight. The change in FM might be minor, but it can have a heavy impact at relative performance during some maneuvers. Still, I expect vertical performance to remain roughly the same.

^Well, you said this:

I'm not sure about Su-27 speeds at all. We can test it as long as I do not fly the flanker as data would be useless.

You cannot compare two aircraft like that. Performance will not stay proportional through the rest of envelope. I'm not even sure how you fly 190kts at max AoA, roughly calculated, that would be almost at, if not over, accelerated stall speed for that load factor. Btw, nothing to do with 104th server, that's entirely different matter. I'm speaking about strictly controlled and "sterile" conditions. As I said, F-15 out turns Su-27 given that both pilots flying the best turns.

Ok, that's more parameters you didn't mention before. Why would anyone fly 190kt ias in dogfight?

Yes, I use tacview, and looking graphs for total energy, tas, aoa, radius, turn rate...

I'm not an idiot.

I'm sorry it's offtopic, maybe admin can separate threads? Anyway, I don't know how you get 14.5 */s sustained... With your settings I can do above 16 easily.

^That's ridiculously high fuel load for both aircraft. I don't even take off with that amount of fuel in Su-27.

F-15 out-turns Su-27 in the newest DCS we have. Go at GnR and try it. Not that Su-27 cannot win, but in pure turn flight it has no chance.

No one said they will make CPU emulator. The point is if an old chip can handle FBW instruction, then i5/i7 should not have a problem.

Basically Su-25T is modernized Su-25 two seater, they pulled out rear seat and packed electronics inside. It has modern HUD and TV display for targeting purposes. It's better equipped, but maneuverability suffers. You would need L-081 pod, Kh-58U and Kh-25MLU anti-radar missiles. Additionally, you can use Kh-25ML laser guided missiles. Keep in mind that one TOR requires two missiles because it usually shot down first one.

Left side Textures - high Ground textures - high Road traffic - on Water - high Visibility (view distance?) - high ???? - high (something about air but I don't know what тепл. abbreviation means) Shadows - high Resolution - 1920 Aspect - 1.7 Number of displays - 1 Resolution of cockpit displays - 512 each frame Textures smoothing (AA) - 16xQ HDR -on Depth of field - on Lens effect - dirth + reflection Right side: Grass slider Trees slider Radius slider AF - on 3d model sprites - on Flat ground shadows - on Windows aero checkbox Vsync checkbox Fullscreen checkbox Oculus rift "Auto detection" checkbox

I believe you need su-25t for that. Human pilot in Su-25t can deal with SA-15, SA-8 and SA-19 with ease. I don't know about AI. Su-25t carries a pod for radar detection and has HUD symbology to lock targets.

No, the misunderstanding is here, as Flycat nicely explained:

Two in DCS, two in FSX and two irl.

Hope someone will repaint those AA aircraft into real livery. I understand why it cannot be official, but nothing a mod cannot fix.