SUBS17

No PARTICLE COLLIDERS that you know of reach the speed of light but there are some that you do not know about that make ISOTOPE which do go faster than the speed of light. ISOTOPE MANUFACTURE involves the COLLISION of PARTICLES for the MANUFACTURE of ISOTOPE. It is not done by using a RING TYPE COLLIDER. It is done by use of a STRAIGHT LINE COLLIDER. The process involves the firing of two particles in order to make an ISOTOPE. Each one is done 1 particle at a time. It takes 17 years to make 1 Kg of ISOTOPE. If you double the barrels and use 2 PARTICLES it halves to 8.5 years for 1 kg of ISOTOPE. Then once you've got 1 kg or more then you put it on the bench and test it. The PARTICLES COLLECT in a string. This involves NANO-TECHNOLOGY in order to view and manipulate the particles for the COLLISION. Obviously there is no TROLLING going here aside your comment. Are you an INDOCTRINATOR, if you are then this conversation would be pointless.

You need to accelerate particles faster than light in order to make ISOTOPES. FASTER THAN LIGHT is possible. That is just a new technology but it is interesting for Scientists to someday have such a Laboratory. Those SUPERINDUCTION MOTORS could be used to power a flying car safely.

There is a new electric engine that uses SUPER INDUCTION to drive it. A normal fan unit would never be enough power for an F35B or YAK141. This unit works similar to a PARTICLE ACCELERATOR and can achieve the 4x speed of light in RPM. In the future there will be Laboratories on Earth that will have such devices and can conduct experiments on particles spinning at such an RPM. It could lead to a new way to make new materials like the PARTICLE COLLIDERS that MANUFACTURE ISOTOPE. I think that the F35B has a bit more stability with its TVN having 4 directions perhaps a future YAK 141 could have a similar TVN. Such a unit can replace a jet engine easily and it would have HYPERSONIC CAPABILITY.

The engines at the front are of an advanced design they are not normal electric motors and it is not from the main turbojet powerplant. They are SUPER ELECTRIC TURBINES although they are described as being lift engines or fan units. Both the F35 and YAK 141 have them. The top RPM of such motors is FASTER THAN LIGHT RPM. Although in that configuration they can not reach that speed, it is to do with the GOVENORS. And with such power why are they not more commonly used for aircraft? Perhaps we'll see more of that in future designs of aircraft and vehicles.

I was referring to the Fly By Wire and how it flies. They are both very similar of course all of that other stuff is different.

No speculations, the NOZZLE on the F35B is 4 directional TVN while the YAK141 uses 2. They are both extremely good aircraft though. The F35B will be used well into the future it has a lot of new technology which make it much better than the original aircraft. I have not yet seen an upgrade number though. The YAK141 never entered service but is an interesting test aircraft.

For both the Fly By Wire comes from the same place.

This is a good video of the YAK 141.

This is funny but KUAT is a real place, it is bigger than what is described in the books. 100% of SpaceShips in Star Wars if you look at them more closely are in fact real, you may find later on some of them might take part in Air shows on Earth. So the sort of detail I provided is not deduced from anything. In any of those photos or videos would there be any SpaceShip or AEROSPACE-FIGHTER that you would think has some technology that I came up with? The answer is all of them and it would be good to later on see some of that technology here on Earth. People think that it is Sentient Kind from the Universe but those are all from Heaven. The SPORTS MODEL is from Sentient Kind from THE SPORTS MODEL PLANET and that is the exception as far as flyable SpaceShips from Sentient Kind is concerned that you may see flying around someday. There is another one called "FRANK" which maybe seen flying around in the future. FRANK is in the United States of America and is from Heaven. FRANK uses a different type of Propulsion than GRYPHON although GRYPHON has the same type of PROPULSION as backup. FRANK uses INTERDIMENSIONAL AIR DUCTING for propulsion. The POWERPLANT GRYPHON uses involving REPULSOR FIELD is one of the most powerful POWERPLANTS ever created. That technology will someday be on cars as part of an ANTI-VEHICLE COLLSION SYSTEM. It can halt a vehicle at 2 inches prior to a collision at 400 MPH without the passengers or driver being harmed.

SU75 looks good I wonder if Mother Russia is also going to buy the F35 as well? The SU75 reminds me of an F-16 but with its own unique shape and performance. Fly By Wire and this will fly extremely well. They mention on this video Artificial Intelligence, they maybe referring to a next generation AWAC's that has Artificial Intelligence and flies itself and is electric.

So what you see are WRATIH AEROSPACE-FIGHTER's from HEAVEN. They are a common sight around New Zealand. For INTERSTELLAR TRAVEL they fly up to HIGH ORBIT and REQUEST a WORMHOLE DOOR to the location that they are travelling to. From here to another GALAXY takes 5 seconds by WORMHOLE DOOR. The HIGHEST PERFORMANCE AEROSPACE-FIGHTERS, COMBAT CHASIS and CAPITAL SPACESHIPS can travel to the most distant GALAXY in an Hour. For HumanKind there is a SpaceShip engine that can travel that distance, it is in KUAT SHIPYARDS(which is an actual place) but it requires HumanKind to design their own SpaceShip for it to go into. So that is a bit about what you observe for a normal SpaceShip it takes 9 days from lift off to land on another planet when using a WORMHOLE DOOR. The HIGHEST PERFORMANCE AEROSPACE-FIGHTER's can reach the moon in 30 minutes from Earth and land. It was not like that a decade ago. It is Advances in AEROSPACE NAVIGATION AND PROPULSION from Earth and Heaven in order to make this possible. And with that comes new technology for HumanKind.

Some already exist in DCS.

Nice.

When you view that video how real does it look to you? Does it appear real like too real to be a prop or special effects? That aircraft could be real but not from here. So for that it would require FLY BY WIRE CODING as it would depend on it for stability. HIGHLY ACCURATE NAVIGATION SYSTEM and wind effects modelled for vertical wing movement. It is possible to build something like an Ornithopter and do not be surprised if you were to see a real one someday.

Check out this new 120mm round.

I do not know who the Prankster is who put those images on there but that is a completely different aircraft that does a similar job. It is on Youtube but the secret stuff is not on the video. This Super A-10 is similar in performance to the A-10's in Terminator Salvation with Fly by Wire and better performance over the original A-10A. So the upgrades could include some new tech involving Navigation and Auto-pilot including an Automatic Inflight Refuelling capability.

Fly By Wire looks good.

This tech is really good it will lead to AUTOPILOT INFLIGHT REFUELLING, AUTOLAND including on a moving ship and safe FLYING CARS. It also leads to being able to see more when it comes to navigation and it is a more accurate instrument for ALTIMETER, AIRSPEED INDICATOR, ARTIFICIAL HORIZON and AoA INDICATOR. The tech that is what I am referring to is HIGHLY ACCURATE NAVIGATION SYSTEM coupled to FLY BY WIRE and AUTOPILOT. It is not using ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE either. Aircraft including AV8B, F35B, Hornet and the Superhornet are being tested with this technology. The A-10CII has some of it but it is under the hood! The extras are in the new Helmet which makes pilots lives much easier. There is a version for Airliners and it will make flights safer. There is more technology coming including an alarm which predicts birds in the flight path and gives a safer altitude to clear them. With this technology a Helmet mounted display can show everything like it is daytime. There is a Soldier version as well as Police and Law Enforcement which uses the same technology in order to be able to clear buildings and find OFFENDERS!

That is an awesome display of the Vulcan, it turns on a dime.

We all know that you know more lol.

No just on my way somewhere, but it does get annoying. If I wanted to communicate with someone I'd land and then talk to them.

I get annoyed when people assume that I am trying to communicate with them when really all that I am doing is hovering and setting Nav to the next destination!

The F-14 ATC works realistically while the Hornet one drops power to an unsafe level on approach and does not accurately hold AoA. It should at least work exactly the same way as an F-14's or better because of DECS. The coders need to try out the F-14s in DCS and see the difference. If you set ATC at the correct AoA and trim it holds AoA within pitch/roll changes so you can fly out the approach without touching the throttle. This makes approaches easier for both a runway and carrier approach. The Hornets in DCS drops power and AoA and rubber bands up and down without holding a pure power for AoA. It has DECS which is very very precise IRL and should not rubber band its power.(increase/ decrease power without holding the AoA)