Skopro_PL

yeah i can i say i was impressed with 18, and i agree that the larger wing area has alot to do with that, resembles the 29 in that way IMHO...you guys should read some of the posts that they have goin on that website..

yes there is a mod i did over a year ago..the link will be on the bottom...this is just a simple mod to make the f-16 flyable and to see the skin. i got my hands on a color layout a while ago so it looks a little different,but not by much..or if u want u can get the other mods that are in the mods section http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?automodule=downloads&showfile=1420

ch-53 is used as a transport aircraft, the ch-54 "skycrane" look totally different and is used for cargo hauling, u can attach a 18 wheeler like container to it http://www.aviation.army.mil/aircraft/ch-54.jpg ch-53 is primarily used by the marines in the us, i believe the navy uses it as well, and the air force,but on a limited basis i believe.. http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/h-53.htm

mig-21's ????? yeah those have been outta commision for a while, also to my knowledge never used mig21's to do those landings mostly su22 and mig29...and it has nothing to do with better surfaces and planes.. it has to do with the probability that runways can be destroyed, and when that happens the pilots have the capability to land on any grass strip or country road ,and u those for a makeshift base..and the last sentence i have to say is that u must not read f-16.net and look at all the news about how a f-16's landing gear somewhere collapsed on landing,also have u never seen ground crews walking the runways everyday looking for stones and pebbles on the runways, that aside could u imagine a viper landing on any surface other than a perfectly clear runway and not being damaged...

where is all this evidence on paper?? i need hard proof sorry, show me that and im a believer..

very true,but now adays these can be performed in a virtual world if they really wanted to... maybe as far to risk it at high alts,but what kind of risk would there be at trying these at high alt you would have time to recover it unless the controllability of the aircraft is not as great as you make it out to be..the fact remains it that ppl right away jump to the conclusion that a f22 can out supermaneuver a su30 on a basis i have yet to see in the real world, those are the ppl that idolize US aircraft, it seems you throw them a new plane that has TVN and they go carzy because its made in the US ,so it must be better then anything else, and i agree it is a modern fighter with alot of capabilities, but we're talking about maneuverability not whos gonna win at BVR..

ok so if u say that it is "controlable" it dosnet mean anything in the terms that at airshows i have yet to see a f22 perform these types of maneuvers.. and you say i idolize russian planes.. thats not all true i look at all the aircraft that fly here and back in Poland(which happens to have russian planes along witht he new f16 block 52+) and i love the viper as much as i love the mig29 now which one would win i cant really say..but that aside im talking about real world maneuvers i have yet to see those performed by the f22..i said nothing in my post about what something can and cant do, i simply say what i have seen...if a f22 can do these things why havent i seen it at any airshows,perhaps they dont want to do it, or maybe its not capable of doing them.. im sure that they have tried and maybe they were sucessful or maybe not,but if they were why not show the full capabilities of the aircraft.. you think the air force is trying to keep it secret or something??come on now..

last time i read this thread it was on page 7 or so...but anyway, i wont lie and say i dont like and appreciate russian aircraft, they are more durable then any other modern fighter( excluding the a-10) they can land on almost any surface( although that is starting to change as with the mig-29m2 the top intakes are gone along with the intake covers)..Dont get me wrong one of my favorite planes is the f-16,but i could not see it landing on a road somewhere like the Polish air force does with its migs( part of training in case of war and moving the aircraft to remote areas and using country roads as runways)..anyway i was looking through patricks aviaiton and came across a su-30 video now if one of u guys say that the f-22 can do that and is more agile im going to stick a cattle prong in your u know what :P, i mean come on u must be really blind to think an f22 could do this, i sure dont think it can... http://www.patricksaviation.com/videos/rafale350/1028/

they will work ,however u will see a gap in the dorsal body area as this is bigger on the s model ,becasue of extra avionics..i use the a model templete to make my skins for both aircraft,but i have to paint that part beyound what i would in the A model,but u can fix this yourself by doing a little touch up in photoshop..

nice pics....both the plane and "companion" so did she comewith the mig flight package;) .looks like she either got dressed for going out the next day or for that late evening.....U dog u:D

third to last one looks pretty damn awesome http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2005/206/929256_20050726_screen001.jpg ...buti agree about the graphics completly..photorealistic but the res of the ground is pretty bad,airfields dont look that bad but those mountains need alot of work..

yeah as far as i know that helo was designed in Pakistan for rescue operations of climbers that got stuck on mountains there at those insane alts of 35K...its either this on of a different helo...

yes it is a mirage 3,the only other aircraft that looks similer is the Kfir ,which is a redisigned mirage5 with canards where that country marking is...

well the topic has been discussed..the Lomac u bought included a copy of FC that we did not know about,so there is no support for the FC that u have ,the fixes are version specific(downloaded or bought from naturalpoint)on the website,i guess the CD version which is on the website might work but dont quote me on it...see what other ppl post and maybe a DEV will respond as well..

well yes choppers are alot harder to fly than planes,but i dont think that the ka50 will be anything like flying a regular helicopter,i think it will fly somewhere in between,if u look at it the hard part about flying a reg(by that i mean one with a main rotar and tail rotar) is that the KA dosent have a tail rotar it has 2 main ones that provide lift but cancel eachother out at the same time making it fly more like a plane more than anything else..this is just my opinion,if there are some ppl out there that have the experience in flying a twin rotar chopper post something about it,well even the devs could let us know since they made it..

1st off the first installation althought made by eagle had (im sure) been doing what UBI wanted to do,and as soon as eagle went on their own they released FC ,im sure u can say u saw a big increase in performance and stability(i know i did),so i think with 1.2 u wont have a thing to worry about,i kno im gonna get it as soon as it comes out..if ur concerned i'll write a review for ya..

i had one thing that i forgot to mention in terms of bugs ingame..when im trying to refuel in MP and someone else is hosting i dont see the refueling probes and i have to go off by instrument flying,they appear as soon as i make contact,but u have to make contact before u see them,i dont know if this has been addressed or fixed but i thought since i remembered it right now i would make a post about it..

yes its grey(urban like,but not quite) USMC MARPAT ,digicam..i actually use woodland digi for airsoft...its realnice..thats why i wanted to do this one,still might just not anytime sonn..

heres one i wanted to do but givin the complex layout of both the paint scheme and the templete i have decided not to start it anytime soon,its a one of a kind paint jod done for the VMFA-314"black knights"

try this it might help http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/IntroEncoding.aspx and the download http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/9series/encoder/default.aspx i have used this in other files it will render the file to a smaller readable size.. u r looking for the WMencoder..

well that not very good news it seems on the 5.7 side..i guess iw ill stick with my 5.6 as well..also yes i have a 9500pro modded to a 9700pro which is then overclocked to hell.i get really good performance on my system all things considered, Krel i had a big difference in performance with the omega over ati's drivers not that i may have gained FPS ,perhaps a couple but the game is running so much smoother for me especially when at the airport with about 10 other aircraft around(not su25T) frame drops have become very seldom and only happen when usually online and im at the airport next to a city(which is normal) i run pretty much everything on a med/hi with 2xAA and 4xAF and innthe air i do no less then 20+ frames.. on the ground its usually around anywhere from 10-18 fps considering my specs i have gotten alot outta my system...give the 5.6 omega a try they are better then stock drivers..

i found omega 5.6 drivers to be extemely good for my system,i wonder what these will perform like...all those that have tried them please post yours specs so perhaps we ould disect them to see if there are any performance/stabili gain..

i among other have gotten an performance increase with 1.1...and if ur running no loman mods i would recommend u getting some that increase performance such as flare fix ,haze update and water mods (since the water is rendered under the terrain as well...

little grouchy r we?! :D it was mostly a staement not really a question..thnx

so u gonna translate it for us perhaps?!