VTJS17_Fire

Source?

Hi, I thought, I saw a bug report about this issue, but can't find it anymore. Seems, there is a graphic layer to much, hiding informations from the right corner and the center. It's almost impossible to read Data there from the HSI or Attack Radar page, nor the SA page.

Bei anderen Radio Items mit switched conditions funktioniert es komischerweise. Dort lasse ich über triggered actions die ROE und States umschalten. Und da lasse ich die jeweils nicht vorhandene auch löschen.

Weiß nicht, ob das noch als kurze Frage zählt Auf jedenfall schein ich nen Denkfehler zu haben, vielleicht kann mir kurz jemand auf den Hinterkopf hauen. Andere switched Condition Trigger funktionieren in dieser Mission. Die Radio Items tauchen nicht auf. Frage: Wo passt das nicht?

Hi, just testing some SAM systems with triggers and noticed, that the "SA-2 TR SNR-75 Fan Song" isn't emitting, until ROE=weapon free. Is that a normal behavior or a bug?

push, trackfile attached

They used DCS in some scenes

It's not that difficult. You nee practise and an calm hand on throttle and stick. And let me say: If you get it once, you can do it at bad weather, in turns, at night. Just don't give up. And I do it my my 12 year old X-52.

You could use them for TDC, for example. If your aircraft has one. ^^ I use it on my X-52 as mouse coursor, for some cockpit clicks.

Hi, I'm following this project with great interest. And I thought, I see it in the DCS shop some weeks ago, but without a detailed description, what I will get with the CAP. But now, I don't find it in the shop (anymore). So, - where can I buy the CAP? - and what's is included (now and in the future, because it's EA? Thanks in advance.

Dynamisches Wetter in ME ausgewählt. Wetterinfo vom Tower bei Take-off ... ist die Windgeschwindigkeit metrisch (m/s) oder imperial (knots) die angesagt wird?

server-20210126-204929.trk

Besten Dank! Die Ladezeiten stören mich mit der SSD gar nicht. Mir geht's eher um die Microruckler.

Nicht mehr Frames ist klar. Aber es müssen doch Grafiken/Texturen nach geladen werden. (siehe Pre-Load Radius in den Optionen). Würde dies nicht auch optimiert werden und micro Stutter eliminieren? Oder hängen die wieder vom Grafikspeicher ab?

Hi, überlege aktuell, mir für DCS eine M.2 zu holen. Windows 10 läuft auf einer SSD, nur DCS soll auf eine M.2. Macht das Sinn, ohne das OS auch auf eine M.2 zu packen und wie deutlich ist der Performanceboost durch die M.2 in DCS? (Und ja, andere Faktoren spielen auch eine Rolle, mich interessiert an dieser Stelle nur der Impact durch die M.2)

I noticed this multiple times in SP and MP, just after flying a route on the Persian Gulf map with Al Minhad AFB. I checked my TCN settings multiple times, but sometimes, DCs shows me a fake TCN on antoher position on the HSI. The Range on HUD works fine. TCN was on. 99X was set. Screenshot attached. You can see Al Minhad AFB on Waypoint 0 on the HSI and the TCN to the south-west in the one screenshot, after I wondered to didn't see the airbase. On the other, I just didn't set the Waypoint, just flew via TCN. After turning TCN complettly off on the UFC and on, it showed the correct TCN position. Do you need the track as well?

I would like to know this, too. I have a dedicated server and Tacview installed on this computer. But how can I activate Tacview with no gui for the server and how to set the delay?

Do you have ISBN numbers of these two? Can't find it on Amazon.

It was more a technical question, not a tactical or general.

Ah, okay. So the "hidden for the planner" hides them from the RWR/show on HUD, as well? Because this way, I should have an accurate bearing and the range for the Radar in ground mode is what? Usually, the search range is for Bagger, than the track/shoot range of the SAMs.

The other points were clear to me. Thanks to clarify that function of the HTS pod. To work around this missing capability, I could use the SLAM-ER (for example, because of its range) and could suggest the position of the emitter via the Ground Radar. Sure, not 100% accurate, above all a group of ground contacts, but a single SAM should be found that way. What do you think?

This is not a vote for one of the both, I want just to clarify it for myself. I read multiple times, that the viper is more capable of doing SEAD, because it has the AN/ASQ-213 HARM pod. I don't have bought the Viper, I just learning the Hornet. And note: I ask for the full finished modules, not the curretn EA access of both. So, what I know about the Hornets capability, when it comes down to SEAD: She can protect herself, while fighting very aggressive, with the SP mode She can pick-up specific radiating emitters with TOO mode. She can engage Surface-to-Air threats with the PB mode, when they'll come online. She can engage Surface-to-Air threats with the SLAM-ER, JSOW or Maverick, when they stay offline (not exactly SEAD but another tactic to reach air-superiority regarding to threats on the ground) So, what can the Viper with its pod, what the Hornet can't do? Or did they upgrade the Hornet we get in DCS to Vipers SEAD capabilities? Thanks