Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
See reference photos, that is how it was on the real thing... blame the German education system in the 40's

 

 

Are we sure it was generaly written wrong? Or in 1 aircraft?

 

Dont find any reference in a quick google wth.

Edited by ericoh
Posted

Actually that might even be a correct spelling. The spelling "Lancester" is sometimes found in older German texts. It's also pronounced differently, sounding like if an English speaker says "Lunnzester".

IIRC it refers to the french spelling for the House Lancaster during the Wars of the Roses. People knew it from their history classes.

Posted

I googled the gunsite a while back as I didn't believe it would have a mention of a Hurricane that late in the war. What came up was a site where you could order spec build replicas of both the revi and the Askania.

 

in any case; feel free to check this out: https://www.google.nl/search?q=askania+ez42&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=_zfiU4fCNMe3PLfFgMgM&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAg&biw=1745&bih=875

 

along with this: http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.de/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/b/Beobachtungsgereate/EZ/EZ%2040/EZ%2040%20Visier.html

Posted
Yes that was the picture...

 

ez422.gif

Cool thanks.

 

P.S.: FYI Lancester/Lancaster has nothing to do with the German language. The name stays the same. I guess the crew just didnt know better.

Posted (edited)
Cool thanks.

 

P.S.: FYI Lancester/Lancaster has nothing to do with the German language. The name stays the same. I guess the crew just didnt know better.

 

Why not? That spelling does exist in old German sources, and the Germans tend to use their own spellings and pronunciations for lots of things. Pretty much the same way we used to write "Neu York" instead of "New York" (actually York was even frequently spelled Jork), Moskau instead the phonetically better "Moskva", and "Peking" instead "Beijing".

 

House Lancaster became "Lancester" pretty much the same way like house Bourbon became "Borbonen" in lots of written sources between the 15th and 20th century.

Using the original names is something that in most cases happened since the 50s.

 

Btw: not only German language does that, but before WWII German was known to do it extremely often, compared to now.

Edited by Aginor
Posted

I dont find any information if it was spelled different back then, it certainly isnt today. vOv Im gonna belive you. Just seemed confusing to me.

Posted

Mosquito is also spelled Moskito.

 

FinnJ

| i7-10700K 3.8-5.1Ghz | 64GB RAM | RTX 4070 12GB | 1x1TB M.2. NVMe SSD | 1x2TB M.2. NVMe SSD | 2x2TB SATA SSD |  1x2TB HDD 7200 RPM | Win10 Home 64bit | Meta Quest 3 |

Posted

That's just the German version of Mosquito.

 

As for the Lancester: On the Internet it is hard to find because such old books are normally transcribed into modern spelling when they are digitalized. But you can find the old one still in names for things (Lancesterrose for example, but even that one is more commonly Lancesterrose) or people's names. Lots of different spellings exist for it.

 

So yeah, it is uncommon, but it may still be accurate.

Posted

I don´t doubt that it´s accurate.

 

I just pointed to the Mosquito to emphasise that the spelling of Lancester probably was a "germanisation".

 

 

FinnJ

| i7-10700K 3.8-5.1Ghz | 64GB RAM | RTX 4070 12GB | 1x1TB M.2. NVMe SSD | 1x2TB M.2. NVMe SSD | 2x2TB SATA SSD |  1x2TB HDD 7200 RPM | Win10 Home 64bit | Meta Quest 3 |

Posted (edited)
They didnt have google to look up the spelling back then...

Yeah, because they always got a 404 error when they typed in "www.gugel.de" ;oD

Edited by Flagrum
lol, dat website ... just actually checked it ... somehow fitting, eh?
Posted
Funny how they didn't even bother with Soviet fighters - it's just a generic "Russian fighter" and off you go :).

 

I was surprised at that too. I have a horrible feeling there was a very simple explanation for it, but I don't think any such debate is either appropriate or necessary as it is all long past history, and thankfully we live (hopefully) in more enlightened times.

Posted
I was surprised at that too. I have a horrible feeling there was a very simple explanation for it, but I don't think any such debate is either appropriate or necessary as it is all long past history, and thankfully we live (hopefully) in more enlightened times.

 

I'm pretty sure it's that way just because pretty much all russian fighters have wingspan about ten metres.

CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k @3.40GHz | Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M | Memory: Kingston 8GB DDR3 | OS W10 | GPU: Sapphire R9 290x 8GBDDR5 | Monitor: Samsung Syncmaster 24" | Devices: Oculus Rift, MS FFB 2 joystick, Saitek X 52 Pro throttle, Saitek Pro pedals, Gametrix Jetseat

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I guess it is possible that they had separate data on the Eastern and Western fronts, and it is possible that they sent the Dora West to counter the strategic bomber offensive. It'd be interesting to explore that more deeply. Does anyone have any data supporting or contradicting that?

Posted

Just checked wingspans of Yak-1, Yak-7, Yak-9, Yak-3, La-5 and La-7. Yak-3 is 9.3 meters and Yak-1 and 7 are 10m and the rest are 9.7 and 9.8. Seeing minimum setting on the dial is 10 anyway, it looks appropriate to just set 10m for Russian fighters.

 

Didn't check it but I think only the MiG-3 had larger wingspan but it was long obsolete by Dora's time already.

Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V

DCS-Dismounts Script

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...