Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 393
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Bad news.

 

I disagree with your choice if the I-16 will be a Orphan aircraft.

 

Orphan aircrafts haven't sense in DCS world because these projects are less profitable tham other projects with a proper environment (playable enemies). We can see DCS is focused in a narrow period of the second World War.

 

Flying in a I-16 versus BF-109k4, FW-190D9, Spitfire, P-51D, P-47D...is a suicide.

 

 

in case you havent noticed there are other 3rd parties already developing other early ww2 aircraft. really, for dcs, any new aircraft is good news!

 

btw, awesome news...i havent noticed that thread until now...may i ask which company is doing all that?

Posted

Seriously, if you guys pull this off to full DCS standard, you can have all my money and my first born.....

 

Well I might keep enough for the bus fare home, but you get my drift ;)

Per Ardua Ad Aquarium :drink:

Specs: Intel i7-9700K, GTX 2080TI, 32GB DDR4, ASUS ROG Strix Z390-E, Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2

Posted
in case you havent noticed there are other 3rd parties already developing other early ww2 aircraft. really, for dcs, any new aircraft is good news!

 

btw, awesome news...i havent noticed that thread until now...may i ask which company is doing all that?

 

Everything seems to going faster around here doesn't it?:pilotfly:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]In 21st century there is only war and ponies.

 

My experience: Jane's attack squadron, IL2 for couple of years, War Thunder and DCS.

My channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyAXX9rAX_Sqdc0IKJuv6dA

Posted

I agree. People are jumping on the band wagon, now that others have paved the way a bit. That's good.

 

Actually now that I think about it: I guess that aircraft is a great choice for the first module to create. It doesn't have complex systems, it is fairly simple to model, and its flight model shouldn't be too complex either, a rather slow prop plane which is still flown by people today, much info available.

Posted
Ah, btw: Congratulations to OctopusG, release of the Blanik for FSX looks nice. :)

 

▲ i agree, just like the Wilga :thumbup: would be great to tow a glider with that in dcsw :thumbsup:

sign-pic4.jpg

Posted

Actually if ED ever manages to implement thermic effects below cumulus clouds (even if it is only like in FSX, so not very complex) I would have a blast to fly a glider in DCS. But I guess most people would disagree, and that's ok.

 

btw, that's one of the things that feels really good in BMS and I miss it in DCS. When you fly your jet under a cumulus and it starts shaking a little bit. That's so awesome. Even though I don't know if a real jet pilot really feels it that much. But it is a +++ for immersion. And slower planes will definitely notice it.

Posted

@Plexus very nice idea ! i f you like you can use some sound from my video :-)

WIN 10; i9-9900K@4,8GHz; Gigabyte Z390 Aorus;GB Corsair DDR4 3600MHz; 2TB Samsung SSD; RTX4090 watercooled; 34" AW3418DW; MS FFB2 Stick

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

How did I ever miss this?! Maaan, a day 1 buy for me, an iconic aircraft + one I really enjoyed flying in IL-2 back in the day. This is great :)

The DCS Mi-8MTV2. The best aviational BBW experience you could ever dream of.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Good to see your progress!

 

btw, any news on your status as an official 3rd party developer?

 

We didn't talk about it with ED else.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Is this the bird that can be carried by the TB-3 ?

Best of luck with this project. I will buy it on release:thumbup:

i5 8600k@5.2Ghz, Asus Prime A Z370, 32Gb DDR4 3000, GTX1080 SC, Oculus Rift CV1, Modded TM Warthog Modded X52 Collective, Jetseat, W10 Pro 64

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...