fixen Posted October 17, 2015 Posted October 17, 2015 Until you get a troll who jettisons all your ordnance and then hops into a plane on the other team. Thinking of which, is there a way to lock the extra seats in your plane so no one can join you? I don't have the L-39, so can't test for myself. Since there is a log which tracks what people do in multiplayer those people would get banned soon enough.
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 Since there is a log which tracks what people do in multiplayer those people would get banned soon enough. And, there could be a permission system. "XxSnip0r420xX wishes to RIO for you! Yes or no?" Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
fixen Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 And, there could be a permission system. "XxSnip0r420xX wishes to RIO for you! Yes or no?" That is a really good idea!
Deki Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 This may or may not have been mentioned in the past - couple of years ago Novak himself released a video depicting VTOL testbed implementation demo, albeit using the Mig-21 model. Now I'm sure LNS experiments a fair deal but given the clues, it could be that we're looking at...well...you fill in the gap :smilewink:
BlackLion213 Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 This may or may not have been mentioned in the past - couple of years ago Novak himself released a video depicting VTOL testbed implementation demo, albeit using the Mig-21 model. Now I'm sure LNS experiments a fair deal but given the clues, it could be that we're looking at...well...you fill in the gap :smilewink: Yes he did, here it is: -Nick
Sleksa Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 This may or may not have been mentioned in the past - couple of years ago Novak himself released a video depicting VTOL testbed implementation demo, albeit using the Mig-21 model. Now I'm sure LNS experiments a fair deal but given the clues, it could be that we're looking at...well...you fill in the gap :smilewink: It's obvious now what it is! Complex missiles with Advanced Targeting Parameters, check Custom shaders for enhanced visual fidelity, check Unique visual features (In-pilot customization, etc.), check New audio cues and enhanced fidelity, check Far more complex avionic and computer systems than in the MiG-21, check New and unique PFM features and aerodynamic configurations, check New or unique methods of propulsion or force distribution, check
MBot Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 The Yak-38 hardly has more complex avionics than the MiG-21, nor does it have a ground mapping radar.
pepin1234 Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 It's obvious now what it is! Complex missiles with Advanced Targeting Parameters, check Custom shaders for enhanced visual fidelity, check Unique visual features (In-pilot customization, etc.), check New audio cues and enhanced fidelity, check Far more complex avionic and computer systems than in the MiG-21, check New and unique PFM features and aerodynamic configurations, check New or unique methods of propulsion or force distribution, check Su-24? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Deki Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 I'm thinking AV-8b II +. I wouldn't be surprised if ED and LNS combined forces on AN/APG-65 family of radar development. At least in this day and age it makes sense to do so purely on economical basis to say the least. Both the Hornet and Harrier use variations of it. Think commonality and rapid development. It sure would be "jaw dropping" since DCS level Harrier was never attempted before and mark my words...IT WOULD SELL!
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 The Yak-38 hardly has more complex avionics than the MiG-21 Its carrier-borne landing sequence was fully automated and its ejection seat was as well. That's quite a bit more advanced than the MiG-21. It also could provide mid course guidance for ASMs. Still no ground mapping, however. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Gargoil Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 Yak-38's combat capabilities are horrible at best, why would they waste time on a useless plane? They need a plane that sells. A harrier is a far better alternative
Flagrum Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 Can't we just agree to link to the first posting that covers one's own opinion/guess/wish? I mean, this thread goes around and around and around and around ... wouldn't it be easier if everyone posts something like: User A: #22 ! User B: #43 ? Or #45 ! User A: lol, but have you considered #11 !? User C: Totally #3 User B: No, no F-16. It's #43! User ... ... ... ... ... ?
Sporg Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 Can't we just agree to link to the first posting that covers one's own opinion/guess/wish? I mean, this thread goes around and around and around and around ... wouldn't it be easier if everyone posts something like: User A: #22 ! User B: #43 ? Or #45 ! User A: lol, but have you considered #11 !? User C: Totally #3 User B: No, no F-16. It's #43! User ... ... ... ... ... ? Lol :lol: And +1 Besides, #1150 :D System specs: Gigabyte Aorus Master, i7 9700K@std, GTX 1080TI OC, 32 GB 3000 MHz RAM, NVMe M.2 SSD, Oculus Quest VR (2x1600x1440) Warthog HOTAS w/150mm extension, Slaw pedals, Gametrix Jetseat, TrackIR for monitor use
dartuil Posted October 18, 2015 Posted October 18, 2015 Lol :lol: And +1 Besides, #1150 :D This guy got it. I think too its viggen. i7 2600k -- Noctua NH-D14--Asrock Z75 Pro3--ASUS GTX970 Strix --16Go Ripjaws X 1333--Thermaltake Smart M650--CoolerMaster Silencio 652S--AOC E2752VQ-- Sandisk Extreme II 480GB--Saitek X-52 Pro --SAITEK PZ35 Pedals
QuiGon Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 I'm thinking AV-8b II +. I wouldn't be surprised if ED and LNS combined forces on AN/APG-65 family of radar development. At least in this day and age it makes sense to do so purely on economical basis to say the least. Both the Hornet and Harrier use variations of it. Think commonality and rapid development. It sure would be "jaw dropping" since DCS level Harrier was never attempted before and mark my words...IT WOULD SELL! Looks like you never heard of RAZBAM? ;) They have been working on a DCS Harrier for quite some time now (maybe 2 years?). They pushed it back in favour of the Mirage2000, but it looks like they will continuing work on it after the Mirage is done. They also made one for FSX. More info on the revive here: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=144822 Because of that I think it's unlikely that LNS will make their own Harrier. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
zaelu Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 If you want LNS to post what they are working on everyone should stop posting speculations for one or two months. Only then they might panic that the interest is going too low and post something. For each post with absurd percents and SF planes you get a bit of delay in hearing what is all about on those 2 modules. :P [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I5 4670k, 32GB, GTX 1070, Thrustmaster TFRP, G940 Throttle extremely modded with Bodnar 0836X and Bu0836A, Warthog Joystick with F-18 grip, Oculus Rift S - Almost all is made from gifts from friends, the most expensive parts at least
TomCatMucDe Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 If you want LNS to post what they are working on everyone should stop posting speculations for one or two months. Only then they might panic that the interest is going too low and post something. For each post with absurd percents and SF planes you get a bit of delay in hearing what is all about on those 2 modules. :P honnestly,there is not much to say in this thread anymore, we are repeating the same stuff over and over again. Until LN announces something, their forum section with only one aircraft is becoming less interesting. the wait may last for couple of months. I think in this case it is better to proceed with your life and continue flying some other DCS modules.
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Yak-38's combat capabilities are horrible at best, why would they waste time on a useless plane? They need a plane that sells. A harrier is a far better alternative They made the MiG-21, after all. I don't know if you were here, but it's okay. It's not exactly popular knowledge, so I'll go ahead and fill you in: LNS actually has an aircraft that will sell, the F-14. :thumbup: Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
QuiGon Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 honnestly,there is not much to say in this thread anymore, we are repeating the same stuff over and over again. Until LN announces something, their forum section with only one aircraft is becoming less interesting. the wait may last for couple of months. I think in this case it is better to proceed with your life and continue flying some other DCS modules. This! I would say it's time to close this thread, since it's only repeating the same discussion over and over. Unless we get new hints of course, but at this point we should get an announcement and no more hints :) Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Gargoil Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 They made the MiG-21, after all. I don't know if you were here, but it's okay. It's not exactly popular knowledge, so I'll go ahead and fill you in: LNS actually has an aircraft that will sell, the F-14. :thumbup: Knowing that they will have lots of sells gives them so much confidence that they can spend invaluable resources on a useless plane instead of making another "best-seller". Flawless logic. :thumbup: And comparing the mig-21 with the yak-38 is... meh... waste of energy to explain you.
pepin1234 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 lets see. Complex missiles with Advanced Targeting Parameters (Su-22 or Su-24) Far more complex avionic and computer systems than in the MiG-21 (Su-22, Su-24, Ya-141, Harrier) New and unique PFM features and aerodynamic configurations (Ya-141, Harrier) New or unique methods of propulsion or force distribution (Yak-141, Harrier) Yak-141 and Harrier are in the final play off! Open contract with Yakolev?? nothing to hide there, all the engine exhaust engineering was sold to Lockheed Martin for the F-35! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Badger1-1 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Ever came to think of it that the new or unique methods of propulsion can be a simple Turboprop?
Manuel_108 Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 Now this is the definition of a circle jerk thread. However, I hope that all these, rather random, suggestions won't influence the date of a small written update by LN.
SandMartin Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 (edited) If they make F-16 and Tornado, we will have all 4 gen main fighters ))) USA: Leatherneck F-14A, DCS ED F-15C, Leatherneck F-16C, DCS EDF/A-18C Russia AF: DCS ED Su-27/33, Mig-29. Europe: Razbam Mirage 2000, Leatherneck Tornado Other Middle East countryies: Leatherneck Mig-21 Then 4 gens ( for 1990 year)will nearly to complete ))) So, I think they making F-16 and Tornado ))) Only Missing 2 titles: Mig-31 and AV-8B. Edited October 19, 2015 by SandMartin Мой youtube канал Группа в VK IBM x3200 Tower, i7 9700k, Asus Z390-P, HyperX Fury DDR4 2x16Gb 3466 Mhz, HyperX Savage 480Gb SSD, Asus RTX3070 Dual OC 8G, 32" Asus PG329Q, Creative Sound Blaster AE-5, HyperX Cloud Alpha + Pulsefire FPS Pro + Alloy FPS brown, Track IR 4 PRO + Clip Pro, Warhog HOTAS + CH Pro Pedal + есть руль Logitech G25
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted October 19, 2015 Posted October 19, 2015 (edited) Knowing that they will have lots of sells gives them so much confidence that they can spend invaluable resources on a useless plane instead of making another "best-seller". Flawless logic. :thumbup: And comparing the mig-21 with the yak-38 is... meh... waste of energy to explain you. Smarmy answers are for people without actual answers. I don't know if you noticed, but pretty much anything released by LNS will be a best seller. The MiG-21 wasn't exactly an aircraft on the top of many people's wishlists when it was announced. For as prolific as it was, it was little more than a flying target in most flight sims. So, if LNS were to come up with a Yak-38, it would sell well. LNS has a fantastic reputation and the selection would be so outlandish given how handicapped it is, that people would probably buy it. You see, flight sims are about simulating flight, not just winning. Just because something can't carry All-Actives and go Mach 2.4 at FL550, doesn't make it "worthless" as sales have clearly shown. But, by all means, feel free to unleash strawmen! After all, it's not like they'd actually make a Forger. The challenge there isn't really the demand, but rather actually trying to find information on an incredibly obscure aircraft that hasn't seen flight operations since the 1980s. Now this is the definition of a circle jerk thread. However, I hope that all these, rather random, suggestions won't influence the date of a small written update by LN. I some how doubt they will. They have a number of aircraft in progress and I would guess that us geeks batting about aircraft ideas won't affect that. I mean, if they are? I'm going to have to set up an email bot to spam Cobra over and over for a PL-12 Airtruk. Edited October 19, 2015 by MiG21bisFishbedL Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up!
Recommended Posts