chrno120 Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 Excalibur? Sturmvogel? Roy focker? Lynn Minmei? The most stupid member in the forum
suntrace1 Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 Call it the USS Enterprise, nobody will believe you have like 300 big nuclear carriers/spaceships with Warp capability. I would :) 1
Force_Feedback Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 I would :) What happens when you fold the wings? You're cheating, you have CIWS on your plane, now nobody will hit you, and everyone will say they got the amraam all wrong (because they know from personal experience that in real life amraams do hit flying ships). Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
Crusty Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 DODDO "too fat to fly" http://www.davidreilly.com/dodo/images/dodobird.jpg Look..if you want to take the piss, in a NAMING thread...you could at least spell it right..eh:pilotfly::megalol: oo err...missus:animals_bunny: ** Anti-Pastie**
TucksonSonny Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 How about the FAG-35? :pilotfly: :megalol: 1 DELL Intel® Core™ i7 Processor 940 2,93 GHz @3 GHz, 8 MB cache | 8.192 MB 1.067 MHz Tri Channel DDR3 | 512 MB ATI® Radeon™ 4850 | 500 GB 7200 rpm Serial ATA | Samsung SM 2693 HM 25.5 " | HOTAS Cougar Thrustmaster |
Stormin Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Hellcat or Wildcat would be good, but the Air Force would never go for either.
Shaman Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 how about F-35 Stealth Chick :D http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/gallery/1146673/photo_06.jpg 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
GGTharos Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Ok, you win :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
cool_t Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 F-35 Hows about it cant hit Mach 2.5? Speed is life, :doh: Cool t
Force_Feedback Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Hows about it cant hit Mach 2.5? Speed is life, :doh: Cool t Most modern planes can't hit above 1.8 cuase they remove the movable inlet doors to save cost. Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
Pilotasso Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Most modern planes can't hit above 1.8 cuase they remove the movable inlet doors to save cost. WRONG! ;) Its to make it stealthier. Movable inlets reflect to radar like a chrystal chandeleers. .
Cobra360 Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 Yet the Typhoon has them and is reported to have a very low head on RCS. IIRC the X-35s achieved M1.6 in test flights and i don't know what they were powered with. The F-35 may be a little higher, possibly M1.7
GGTharos Posted June 2, 2006 Posted June 2, 2006 The Typhoon is not a stealth aircraft, like the suberbug isn't. They're both 'reduced observability' aircraft, with a reduction in RCS to shorten detection range - but not as radically as an F22 or F35. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
BladeLWS Posted June 3, 2006 Author Posted June 3, 2006 How about the FAG-35? :pilotfly: :megalol: Oh? So that'd make the Su-27 its manslave then? :megalol:
Guest IguanaKing Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 Hell...just dispense with all of the clever nicknames and just call it what it is...the F-35 Bomb Truck. This aircraft has extraordinary capabilties in just the sheer weight of ordnance it can carry, that's not even touching on the other sensor and anti-sensor capabilities.
tflash Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 Since it will be paid mostly by money lent in China, they could give it a Chinese name? F-35 Mao or something? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Cobra360 Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 The F-35 Vulture, it orbits high above it's prey and strikes when its not looking. Also about the F-35 there is a piece about it in the latest issue of AFM. I havent read it yet myself but it headlines that the UK are considering pulling out of the project. I can't see that happening as the Royal Navy will have no fighters if this hppens. Israel is also not happy that it will not be allowed to fit it's own systems to the F-35 and may also pull out of the project.
F22FighterPilot Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 Why do we have to recycle old names and put a II after it? Can't we come up with something creative and unique? Windows XP Home, 768 MB RAM, Pentium 4 @1.5 GHz, Nvidia GeForce 2
Guest IguanaKing Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 How about the F-35 Owl? The owl, although its name is a bit unsexy, is by far, the undisputed aerial stealth predator, and he/she works best in darkness. Ever heard an owl flap its wings? If you answer "yes" to that question...well...caught ya. :D
graywo1fg Posted June 3, 2006 Posted June 3, 2006 What about the "F-35 Major Pwnage" :thumbup: Voice of Jester AI Death From Above =DFA= Squadron Discord - https://discord.gg/deathfromabove http://www.twitch.tv/graywo1f https://www.youtube.com/user/Lonewo1fg
Guest IguanaKing Posted June 4, 2006 Posted June 4, 2006 Its just more international political mythology, Hawg. Don't try to understand it, it'll drive you crazy, and there's not much truth to it anyway...so let them believe what they want to believe. :D
Recommended Posts