Jump to content

Yugoslavia/Balkans  

303 members have voted

  1. 1. Yugoslavia/Balkans

    • Yes
      274
    • No
      18
    • This is stupid waste of time.
      11


Recommended Posts

Posted

Voted yes, but It should definitely be expanded to include most of Italy and its airbases. You can't really have a balkans theater without Aviano and Amendola since a lot of missions departed from here. Of course the problem of Italy is that it would require a lot of specific buildings and objects to properly depict some cities (Venice for example).

Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

Posted

Just beware! This time we would have the S-300, and much more technically correct planes. :music_whistling:

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Everything is possible ...

Posted (edited)

Do notice that you don't really have to simulate every village... :D Few low poly houses and fences would be fine for those populated hilltops. Also, there is no big need for making all the big cities - and even less to make them photo/sattelite realistic. Do you honestly believe Caucasus was done like that? But yet, we have had our fair share of fun in that theatre for many years. Yes, local people, such as myself, would find it a bit awkward to know that Banjaluka is bigger than *that*, or Sarajevo, but again - this isn't ArmA. No need for extreme realism. As for the population, have you seen the teaser screens of the WWII map? It is populated in the IL2 style and I don't have a feeling that DCS has problems with it ;)

 

I would like it with some more Airbases in Italy, even if the rest of Italian terrain was low quality.

I agree on that, but given that ED wants to enhance experience instead of trying to achieve the level of detail in vanilla FSX (ROFL!), I don't think that they would publish a theater that looks like that. But a middle solution usually works the best... ;)

Edited by Pitot

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted

You make some good points. It would make a good map. And the area mass is almost perfect.

harrier landing GIFRYZEN 7 3700X Running at 4.35 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti

32gb DDR4 RAM @3200 MHz

Oculus CV1 NvME 970 EVO

TM Warthog Stick & Throttle plus 11" extension. VKB T-Rudder MKIV

Posted
Voted yes, but It should definitely be expanded to include most of Italy and its airbases. You can't really have a balkans theater without Aviano and Amendola since a lot of missions departed from here. Of course the problem of Italy is that it would require a lot of specific buildings and objects to properly depict some cities (Venice for example).

 

Water and some gondolas would be just fine, trust me. This is not a game where you need to have awesome structures, as much as I personally feel the same as people who would like to GBU12 a pretty building :D There is only a need for a reference to the real landscapes and cities - just for the sake of creating the atmosphere. The gameplay is what matters the most. That is one of the reasons DCS expands (slowly, but still - expands) even after all the legal and developing troubles - because it has an audience that FEELS the atmosphere, the gameplay. We never had problems with, for example, flying over Tuapse that looks like 300 ppl village, while in RL it is a bit different. The level of modeling the cities/villages needs to be just as much detailed to produce the feeling you're flying over Balkans. No need for modeling authentic Serbian village with 4 guys rotating a pig on the skewer in the backyard, while 2 of them are passed out from rakija :D :D :D

 

As for including regions of Italy - only developers know how hard they can squeeze the engine at this point in time. I would love to see the same as you, do notice :)

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted
Water and some gondolas would be just fine, trust me. This is not a game where you need to have awesome structures, as much as I personally feel the same as people who would like to GBU12 a pretty building :D There is only a need for a reference to the real landscapes and cities - just for the sake of creating the atmosphere. The gameplay is what matters the most. That is one of the reasons DCS expands (slowly, but still - expands) even after all the legal and developing troubles - because it has an audience that FEELS the atmosphere, the gameplay. We never had problems with, for example, flying over Tuapse that looks like 300 ppl village, while in RL it is a bit different. The level of modeling the cities/villages needs to be just as much detailed to produce the feeling you're flying over Balkans. No need for modeling authentic Serbian village with 4 guys rotating a pig on the skewer in the backyard, while 2 of them are passed out from rakija :D :D :D

 

As for including regions of Italy - only developers know how hard they can squeeze the engine at this point in time. I would love to see the same as you, do notice :)

 

I would't dismiss a city like Venice as "water and some gondolas" or even put it at the same level of Tuapse, for the same reason that you can't have Las Vegas modelled as a generic village in the NTTR map. These are major world renowned landmarks and in 2016 I don't think you'd get away selling a map made of only mountains and generic villages. This stuff works in BMS because it has a whole lot more atmosphere and immersion than DCS atm (dynamic campaign anyone?), and they still made a good effort in modelling the major cities to the amount that is allowed by their graphics engine.

Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

Posted
I would't dismiss a city like Venice as "water and some gondolas" or even put it at the same level of Tuapse, for the same reason that you can't have Las Vegas modelled as a generic village in the NTTR map. These are major world renowned landmarks and in 2016 I don't think you'd get away selling a map made of only mountains and generic villages. This stuff works in BMS because it has a whole lot more atmosphere and immersion than DCS atm (dynamic campaign anyone?), and they still made a good effort in modelling the major cities to the amount that is allowed by their graphics engine.

 

I must admit that I agree on all said.

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted

My idea of Balkans theater

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=138774&stc=1&d=1460923690

 

Square 900x900km

  • Like 1

MainMenulogo.png.6e3b585a30c5c1ba684bc2d91f3e37f0.png

 

ACER Predator Orion 9000: W10H | Intel i9-7900X OC@4.5Ghz | 8x16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport | Sapphire GTX1080TI | Intel 900P 480GB | Intel 600P 256GB | HP EX950 1TB | Seagate Firecuda 2TB

ACER Predator XB281HK: 28" TN G-SYNC 4K@60hz

ThrustMaster Warthog Hotas, TPR, MFD Cougar Pack, HP Reverb Pro

Posted

The Balkan region would be perfect for many modules we have right now for DCS.

But we really need the italien airfields to get the right impression.

 

So for me a big YES

 

It would bei nice to have the map dimensions that FSX have ;)

  • Like 2

kind regards

 

Bender_39

Posted
My idea of Balkans theater

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=138774&stc=1&d=1460923690

 

Square 900x900km

 

I like this.

 

Fictional YUAF Approves.

 

13217598_919953114816817_7992378988245317622_o.jpg

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted

I Voted Yes, we need a balkan map :)

Have a nice day! :thumbup: // Bassemann87

______________

My Potato PC Specs:

Lenovo T530-28ICB +500GB SSD / OS: Windows 10 64Bit / Thrustmaster T.16000M FCS FLIGHT PACK

Posted

Only if it includes the south of Austria. :)

 

In earnest, this would be a very attractive theater of operations with a multitude of possibilities. I suppose it would also be a lot of work due to population density, though.

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

Posted

This would be awesome. However, it does include a multitude of very well known und unique cities that would have to be modelled to some degree of accuracy.

PC Specs / Hardware: MSI z370 Gaming Plus Mainboard, Intel 8700k @ 5GHz, MSI Sea Hawk 2080 Ti @ 2100MHz, 32GB 3200 MHz DDR4 RAM

Displays: Philips BDM4065UC 60Hz 4K UHD Screen, Pimax 8KX

Controllers / Peripherals: VPC MongoosT-50, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, modded MS FFB2/CH Combatstick, MFG Crosswind Pedals, Gametrix JetSeat

OS: Windows 10 Home Creator's Update

Posted
This would be awesome. However, it does include a multitude of very well known und unique cities that would have to be modelled to some degree of accuracy.

 

"Some degree" - Modelling variety of recognizable landmarks (in "buildings section"), but rest can be low poly buildings. Caucasus is hardly near that as it is, and it is still good. You all honestly believe they didn't cut out a lot from this theater? Point I am trying to say - let's not make this conversation into "too bad it can't work" type of. Developers know in what amount they can reproduce the geographical theater into the game one, not us. So, if we nag too much about "too bad it can't be done" it may give us a counter effect. We should make a big deal out of it to draw their attention, to prove to them that they will earn money from making it. Money they can invest in creating even more content. I mean, yeah, they surely love what they do, but without money it's a no - go - business. So, let's prove that majority of players are interested in this theater - and they might turn their attention to evaluating can it, how it can be and when it could be made. :)

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted
"Some degree" - Modelling variety of recognizable landmarks (in "buildings section"), but rest can be low poly buildings. Caucasus is hardly near that as it is, and it is still good. You all honestly believe they didn't cut out a lot from this theater? Point I am trying to say - let's not make this conversation into "too bad it can't work" type of. Developers know in what amount they can reproduce the geographical theater into the game one, not us. So, if we nag too much about "too bad it can't be done" it may give us a counter effect. We should make a big deal out of it to draw their attention, to prove to them that they will earn money from making it. Money they can invest in creating even more content. I mean, yeah, they surely love what they do, but without money it's a no - go - business. So, let's prove that majority of players are interested in this theater - and they might turn their attention to evaluating can it, how it can be and when it could be made. :)

 

I'll get the ball rolling: make a bundle of DCS: F-16C + DCS: Balkans theatre, add a dynamic campaign and there you go, all the Falcon 4 people are instantly ported over to DCS :thumbup:

  • Like 1

Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

Posted
I'll get the ball rolling: make a bundle of DCS: F-16C + DCS: Balkans theatre, add a dynamic campaign and there you go, all the Falcon 4 people are instantly ported over to DCS :thumbup:

 

 

 

Not all... The half of the users will complain that it will cost some money ;)

Posted
Not all... The half of the users will complain that it will cost some money ;)

 

LOL'd hard on the last part :D But yeah, I would even agree on 5 year ETA on full package of what the guy said. F16+F18+Balkans+Joy. :pilotfly:

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted
Not all... The half of the users will complain that it will cost some money ;)

 

Lol!

Well, if you consider that they (we) have all of that for free right now... Actually there are far more chances of bms getting new graphics than dcs getting a dynamic campaign engine...

Windows 10 - Intel i7 7700K 4.2 Ghz (no OC) - Asus Strix GTX 1080 8Gb - 16GB DDR4 (3000 MHz) - SSD 500GB + WD Black FZEX 1TB 6Gb/s

Posted
Lol!

Well, if you consider that they (we) have all of that for free right now... Actually there are far more chances of bms getting new graphics than dcs getting a dynamic campaign engine...

 

Let's not get that ball rolling. All of us have a lot criticism to say about current affairs in DCS, but this is not a thread to say it in. :)

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

Posted
My old man flew in allied force, this would be awesome.

 

What aircraft? :)

Don't ask, here's the answer: 95% of my posts are edited because I have OCD.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
My idea of Balkans theater

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=138774&stc=1&d=1460923690

 

Square 900x900km

 

That map will allow us to use Su-25, Hips and Hinds in Macedonian civil war, apart from various fictional conflicts in Greece, Albania...

I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...