LcSummers Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Hi, its been a while i flew the Mig 21. Is it working on NTTR? I tried it but have no luck! Thanks
mwd2 Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 I can place a MiG-21bis on NTTR and jump into the cockpit w/o any problems. Playing: DCS World Intel i7-13700KF, 64GB DDR5 @5600MHz, RTX 4080 ZOTAC Trinity, WIN 11 64Bit Prof. Squadron "Serious Uglies" / Discord-Server: https://discord.gg/2WccwBh Ghost0815
Art-J Posted June 12, 2016 Posted June 12, 2016 Some seem to have issues to get it working in 2.0. Some don't. I'm in the latter category, but I don't fly it there anyway, because of some older, serious bugs, which have been solved only in the latest 1.5.3 updates. Waiting for the 2.0.2 MiG binaries to "catch up". i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.
LcSummers Posted June 12, 2016 Author Posted June 12, 2016 Thanks guys. I will wait for the new patch. Hopefully its working then.
72westy Posted June 13, 2016 Posted June 13, 2016 I was also curious of this...I see no option to fly the Mig-21 in the NTTR quick mission/s. System 1: Windows 10 Pro 22H2 Build 19045.5198 - Core i7 3770K/Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3 (BIOS F-10)/32GB G-Skill Trident X DDR3 CL7-8-8-24/Asus RTX 2070 OC 8GB - drivers 551.61/LG Blue Ray DL Burner/1TB Crucial MX 500 SSD/(x2)1TBMushkinRAWSSDs/2TB PNY CS900 SSD/Corsair RM750w PSU/Rosewill Mid Challenger Tower/34" LG LED Ultrawide 2560x1080p/Saitek X56 HOTAS/TrackIR 5 Pro/Thermaltake Tt esports Commander Gear Combo/Oculus Quest 2/TM 2xMFD Cougar/InateckPCIeUSB3.2KU5211-R System 2: Windows 11 Home 24H2 26100.4770 - MSI Codex Series R2 B14NUC7-095US - i7 14700F/MSI Pro B760 VC Wifi II/32GB DDR5 5600mhz RAM/RTX 5060ti OC 16GB/2TB MSI M482/4TB CT4000P3PSSD8 SSD/4TB SPCC SSD/Kingspec 4TB SSD/650w Gold PSU
gavagai Posted June 13, 2016 Posted June 13, 2016 It's still all screwed up for me, and it's been that way for months. My head shakes and stutters, there is no external sound, and the control diagram is there on the lower left. P-51D | Fw 190D-9 | Bf 109K-4 | Spitfire Mk IX | P-47D | WW2 assets pack | F-86 | Mig-15 | Mig-21 | Mirage 2000C | A-10C II | F-5E | F-16 | F/A-18 | Ka-50 | Combined Arms | FC3 | Nevada | Normandy | Straight of Hormuz | Syria
51GRIZZLY Posted June 13, 2016 Posted June 13, 2016 For me it works like a charm on NTTR .... no problems at all :pilotfly:
eekz Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 Will Mig-21's FM get some love in the observed future? VIRPIL Controls Servers
Buzzles Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 Will Mig-21's FM get some love in the observed future? What do you think is wrong with it? Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here!
eekz Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 (edited) What do you think is wrong with it? That was a question to developers. But if you are interested, I don't "think", I know that some things are wrong. Just a short example http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=152979 Anyway, you have a module, you have search forum options... Edited June 15, 2016 by eekz VIRPIL Controls Servers
Buzzles Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 That was a question to developers. But if you are interested, I don't "think", I know that some things are wrong. Just a short example http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=152979 Anyway, you have a module, you have search forum options... I was genuinely curious about what was wrong, turns out I'd forgotten about that thread and the AOA 36 issue. I too hope that's fixed at some point. Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here!
FSKRipper Posted June 15, 2016 Posted June 15, 2016 That was a question to developers. But if you are interested, I don't "think", I know that some things are wrong. Just a short example http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=152979 Anyway, you have a module, you have search forum options... Maybe you should join the public bugtracker of LNS if you are concerned that your issue is not taken care of. :music_whistling: i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
pepin1234 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Maybe you should join the public bugtracker of LNS if you are concerned that your issue is not taken care of. :music_whistling: I still don't understand why we have a bugtracker outside DCS forum. We are here, the pilots are here. Why we need notify the bugs outside this forum... Mig-21 module is plenty of bug and having a bugtracker outside ED forum don't help at all 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Art-J Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Well, bug-reporting wise, this forum is a bit of a mess, with folks talking about the -21 issues all over the place, including a few posts yesterday in F-5E section (WTF??!!). Some people also include tracks, screens etc., others don't bother with anything apart from saying "dis broken, fix it", some report things which have been reported already numerous times etc. Tracker not only keeps reports in once place, but also forces people to report them in standardized manner, indicates who's responsible for fixing certain bugs and what their status is. If ED forums cannot provide facility for doing so, external site is needed. 1 i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.
Cobra847 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Well, bug-reporting wise, this forum is a bit of a mess, with folks talking about the -21 issues all over the place, including a few posts yesterday in F-5E section (WTF??!!). Some people also include tracks, screens etc., others don't bother with anything apart from saying "dis broken, fix it", some report things which have been reported already numerous times etc. Tracker not only keeps reports in once place, but also forces people to report them in standardized manner, indicates who's responsible for fixing certain bugs and what their status is. If ED forums cannot provide facility for doing so, external site is needed. Correct! We will be continuing our policy of using our own bugtracker. (Also, external? We are the developers of the MiG-21bis. It's by definition a first party location for bugs.) Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Cobra847 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Will Mig-21's FM get some love in the observed future? In the very near future. Big MiG-21 update soon. Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
azm Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 In the very near future. Big MiG-21 update soon. That`s good, thank you!
pepin1234 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Well, bug-reporting wise, this forum is a bit of a mess, with folks talking about the -21 issues all over the place, including a few posts yesterday in F-5E section (WTF??!!). Some people also include tracks, screens etc., others don't bother with anything apart from saying "dis broken, fix it", some report things which have been reported already numerous times etc. Tracker not only keeps reports in once place, but also forces people to report them in standardized manner, indicates who's responsible for fixing certain bugs and what their status is. If ED forums cannot provide facility for doing so, external site is needed. Just let you know I never logged into this bugtracker project and neither thinking log in for the future. I cant be in different bugtracker spread everywhere to report bugs. I have lot of modules and the place is ED forum. This is obvious... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FSKRipper Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Just let you know I never logged into this bugtracker project and neither thinking log in for the future. I cant be in different bugtracker spread everywhere to report bugs. I have lot of modules and the place is ED forum. This is obvious... Nope, These forums contain mainly redundant bug discussions, often with no evidence like orded from ED (Version, Situation, Hardware, logs, tracks and screenshots). The LNS bugtracker lists which Bugs are reported, in which development stage with which priority they are. So if you have an honest interest in bringing the MiG-21 foward you would use the tracker of the developers. Some 80 pages FC3 bug discussions would have been a short, constructive database entry, giving the developers the opportunity to work instead of reading treatises of different viewpoints i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
pepin1234 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Nope, These forums contain mainly redundant bug discussions, often with no evidence like orded from ED (Version, Situation, Hardware, logs, tracks and screenshots). The LNS bugtracker lists which Bugs are reported, in which development stage with which priority they are. So if you have an honest interest in bringing the MiG-21 foward you would use the tracker of the developers. Some 80 pages FC3 bug discussions would have been a short, constructive database entry, giving the developers the opportunity to work instead of reading treatises of different viewpoints Nope what? You are not in a software only for Leatherneck modules. This is DCS and the huge community is here. The bugs can be in relationships with others different modules. So for sure getting apart to solve the module bugs never gonna help for a multimodule, multideveloper like DCS project. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FSKRipper Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) Nope what? You are not in a software only for Leatherneck modules. This is DCS and the huge community is here. The bugs can be in relationships with others different modules. So for sure getting apart to solve the module bugs never gonna help for a multimodule, multideveloper like DCS project. You ARE in a software corner for Leatherneck product problems only. If it is in conjunction with DCS as a whole it will be addressed and forwarded to the ED Team or other developers but nearly any disscussions here are completely MiG-21 specific. The Problem in this case is the huge community, I don't take myself out of this group but have you an idea how little people are delivering useful bug reports? Since you are following the FC3 Forums very well you should know it... So if a developer offers an efficient opportunity to hunt bugs rather than try to moderate complains, opinions and ideas it would be wise to join in if your heart hangs on this module. BTW it is very satisfying when you can control that your reported bug is in Fixing Progress. Also no one is getting apart since all fixes have to be send to ED for testing and Quality Control. You would think otherwise after you checked out the tracker.... Edited June 16, 2016 by FSKRipper i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Buzzles Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 The bugs can be in relationships with others different modules. So for sure getting apart to solve the module bugs never gonna help for a multimodule, multideveloper like DCS project. If the bug is affecting multiple modules, then it's probably a bug with the DCS World platform, so should be posted in the relevent section for ED to pick up. LNS can't fix bugs with DCSW, only their modules. Personally speaking. as a developer in a different industry, a structured bug report via a dedicated tracker is infinitely more useful than some of the emails I get at work, and much more than a lot of the bug reports I see on these (and other) forums. Fancy trying Star Citizen? Click here!
pepin1234 Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 If the bug is affecting multiple modules, then it's probably a bug with the DCS World platform, so should be posted in the relevent section for ED to pick up. LNS can't fix bugs with DCSW, only their modules. Personally speaking. as a developer in a different industry, a structured bug report via a dedicated tracker is infinitely more useful than some of the emails I get at work, and much more than a lot of the bug reports I see on these (and other) forums. A developer need interacting with DCS World community. Going apart to fix bugs is get isolated from a big part of the DCS community and a big part of Mig-21 module owners. Me and some other Mig-21 owners never report in bugtracker page. There you know. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
FSKRipper Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 A developer need interacting with DCS World community. Going apart to fix bugs is get isolated from a big part of the DCS community and a big part of Mig-21 module owners. Me and some other Mig-21 owners never report in bugtracker page. There you know. Your choice. But blame yourself if the development progress is to slow in your opinion. Nothing more to add. i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
grunf Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Me and some other Mig-21 owners never report in bugtracker page. There you know. I really don't understand why not... The registration process is easy and free, and so is bug reporting. The communication is on a higher level than here (mostly :D), with no redundant chit chat. I'm not the most active reporter, I only submited couple of bugs, but it's very satisfactory to see them fixed.
Recommended Posts