Jump to content

Operation "Blue Flag" - 24/7 PvP Campaign - ROUND 9


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
So... Lateley there has been an issue with the balance. The F15 has better missiles than the Su-27 and i have been having a good time raping red for the last 2 rounds. And now they have the more balanced missiles i cant have so much fun raping them.

 

Due to this all the most structured players that use SRS have been going blue and the teams are mad stacked.

 

This creates an unfair advantage to the blue team.

 

Please disable F15 and give them F-5's or just place S-300 in a 10 KM grid all over the map.

 

Thank you.

Nice one Cisco :D

 

10 blues vs 2 reds and blue said it's nice fight. I lol when I saw that.

Edited by Oceandar

Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze

Posted
I'd rather prefer to have FC3 planes removed :D

 

Since there will never ever be any modern Russian planes added to DCS, FC3 will sadly be the only modern OPFOR planes.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)
Since there will never ever be any modern Russian planes added to DCS, FC3 will sadly be the only modern OPFOR planes.

 

Never say never. Someday (maybe this year? :) ) we will get our MiG-29K, MiG-29M or MiG-31... :) (hope dies last!!!)

Edited by DanielNL
DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart

PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013

DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.)

Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence

Posted
Never say never. Someday (maybe this year? :) ) we will get our MiG-29K, MiG-29M or MiG-31... :) (hope dies last!!!)

 

I would pay all the money I have for any of those, but we will never ever get them.

 

Anything post 1970's has 0% chance in hell of coming to DCS because of the new Russian laws.

 

Su-27SM, Mig-29, Mig-23, all cancelled with no reason given to us because of NDA.

 

NDA = ED told us not to tell you guys that Putin has classified everything and we literally can't make Russian modules anymore.

 

 

So for now we make due with FC3 versions of the MiG-29 and Su-27...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
I would pay all the money I have for any of those, but we will never ever get them.

 

Anything post 1970's has 0% chance in hell of coming to DCS because of the new Russian laws.

 

Su-27SM, Mig-29, Mig-23, all cancelled with no reason given to us because of NDA.

 

NDA = ED told us not to tell you guys that Putin has classified everything and we literally can't make Russian modules anymore.

 

 

So for now we make due with FC3 versions of the MiG-29 and Su-27...

 

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=180274

 

See Seaeagle post. Its kinda OT, isn't it ? Lets not derail the thread :D

Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze

Posted
because of the new Russian laws.

 

Which "new" russian laws?

 

NDA = ED told us not to tell you guys that Putin has classified everything and we literally can't make Russian modules anymore.

 

Wait, but surely there are retired MiG-31 pilots out there who are allowed to tell us what the cockpit looked like (in the 80s), how the systems worked etc etc and can share most of that (by now declassified I assume) information with a computergames-developing studio after more than 32 years since it was introduced? o_O After all we ask for nothing more than the first "MiG-31" and not the latest B or BM version (which more likely has many still classified systems/specifications)... -.-

 

 

Also MiG-29K wouldn't be hard to make, just the hook to land on carriers and done. :)

DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart

PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013

DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.)

Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence

Posted
I would pay all the money I have for any of those, but we will never ever get them.

 

Anything post 1970's has 0% chance in hell of coming to DCS because of the new Russian laws.

 

Su-27SM, Mig-29, Mig-23, all cancelled with no reason given to us because of NDA.

 

NDA = ED told us not to tell you guys that Putin has classified everything and we literally can't make Russian modules anymore.

 

 

So for now we make due with FC3 versions of the MiG-29 and Su-27...

 

This is exactly the reason they need to cut ties with Russia. If ED can't make Russian aircraft, it pretty much ruins this sim as a whole, unless you want to simulate NATO vs NATO. The FC3 aircraft are nice, but have no place in a modern DCS sim. It's ridiculous to me that a company that has zero ties with Russia could drop a sim and make any aircraft they want, but ED has their hands tied. I won't pretend to know why they haven't moved on from this headache that prevents them from developing these much needed aircraft, all I know is that they need to.

I9 9900k @ 5ghz water cooled, 32gb ram, GTX 2080ti, 1tb M.2, 2tb hdd, 1000 watt psu TrackIR 5, TM Warthog Stick and Throttle, CH Pedals

Posted
Which "new" russian laws?

 

 

 

Wait, but surely there are retired MiG-31 pilots out there who are allowed to tell us what the cockpit looked like (in the 80s), how the systems worked etc etc and can share most of that (by now declassified I assume) information with a computergames-developing studio after more than 32 years since it was introduced? o_O After all we ask for nothing more than the first "MiG-31" and not the latest B or BM version (which more likely has many still classified systems/specifications)... -.-

 

 

Also MiG-29K wouldn't be hard to make, just the hook to land on carriers and done. :)

 

The information for those aircraft are out there and available. That's what baffles me. It's just the Russian government won't let ED make these aircraft for the sim.

I9 9900k @ 5ghz water cooled, 32gb ram, GTX 2080ti, 1tb M.2, 2tb hdd, 1000 watt psu TrackIR 5, TM Warthog Stick and Throttle, CH Pedals

Posted
Which "new" russian laws?

 

 

 

Wait, but surely there are retired MiG-31 pilots out there who are allowed to tell us what the cockpit looked like (in the 80s), how the systems worked etc etc and can share most of that (by now declassified I assume) information with a computergames-developing studio after more than 32 years since it was introduced? o_O After all we ask for nothing more than the first "MiG-31" and not the latest B or BM version (which more likely has many still classified systems/specifications)... -.-

 

 

Also MiG-29K wouldn't be hard to make, just the hook to land on carriers and done. :)

 

And that even though only less than 10% of team red pilots are on TS atm... -.- so dumb lol. RvE obviously doing their own sh*t (they are together on some TS server obviously and having fun & teamwork...)

 

 

PLEASE bring back killmessages (with 30 or 60 seconds delay for example), I don't even know if I just got splashed by fighter, Stinger or Mistral!!!

 

 

Maybe we should make this like a stream, when I'm in Teamspeak, every red pilot who is in Teamspeak with me (not AFK, flying around) gets 1 € every hour. :) What do you guys think? Would that be enough reward for you (the ones not in teamspeak, IF they're even reading this thread...) to join teamspeak? :D

 

BETTER (for the ones not reading this thread), we make it easy, serveradmins, just add an ingame notification (top right corner of screen) every 20 minutes:

 

"Please join our Buddyspike teamspeak server @ "buddyspike.ddns.net:1337", password "RayGun" to enjoy teamwork and GCI coordination! :) "

 

(I just did the ddns part for you guys, the awesome Buddyspike Blue Flag community, so from today on, "buddyspike.ddns.net" will auto redirect to " 89.163.173.82 " ;) Yes, I know, ddns.net/no-ip.com is an awesome service!)

 

IMO, unless you saw it and know the same way you'd know if you really got shot down...I really hope they don't bring back kill messages. There's no reason to have them. The only excuse I hear from people that want them is pure curiosity. That just isn't a good enough reason to me.

I9 9900k @ 5ghz water cooled, 32gb ram, GTX 2080ti, 1tb M.2, 2tb hdd, 1000 watt psu TrackIR 5, TM Warthog Stick and Throttle, CH Pedals

Posted
It's just the Russian government won't let ED make these aircraft for the sim.

 

Wait, ED is based in USA or? Or are the russian developers in ED the only ones who can continue developing the game? How can the russian government prohibit sth. on a USA based developer?

DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart

PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013

DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.)

Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence

Posted (edited)
Wait, ED is based in USA or? Or are the russian developers in ED the only ones who can continue developing the game? How can the russian government prohibit sth. on a USA based developer?

 

As Rage already said: ED is russian. I'm really startled that you haven't already noticed that after you have been around here for quite some time now. :huh:

 

You can find a fotostory of Wags visiting the ED office in Moscow here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=45782 ;)

(It was almost 10 years ago, so things have probably changed a bit there)

Edited by QuiGon

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted
This is exactly the reason they need to cut ties with Russia.

Isn't ED's main source of income from military contracts for sim software?

 

Cutting ties with Russia in that regard seems silly.

/да бойз/

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Nice one Cisco :D

 

10 blues vs 2 reds and blue said it's nice fight. I lol when I saw that.

 

I was one who said good fight. There was a furball that was 3v3 and it was a good fight. I was not commenting on the overall server balance. Take your butt hurt elsewhere.

Posted
So... Lateley there has been an issue with the balance. The F15 has better missiles than the Su-27 and i have been having a good time raping red for the last 2 rounds. And now they have the more balanced missiles i cant have so much fun raping them.

 

Due to this all the most structured players that use SRS have been going blue and the teams are mad stacked.

 

This creates an unfair advantage to the blue team.

 

Please disable F15 and give them F-5's or just place S-300 in a 10 KM grid all over the map.

 

Thank you.

 

If balancing is the reason ill buy the enhanced missiles, but if unlimited su33 lives are real, blue will likely never move further north than Sochi.

Posted
I was one who said good fight. There was a furball that was 3v3 and it was a good fight. I was not commenting on the overall server balance. Take your butt hurt elsewhere.

I won't comment any further, just :D

Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze

Posted
I was one who said good fight. There was a furball that was 3v3 and it was a good fight.

It was a pretty nice furball against those overpowered ET launchers with the flightmodel of a skateboard. Raptor had it on video. :thumbup:

 

Posted
It was a pretty nice furball against those overpowered ET launchers with the flightmodel of a skateboard. Raptor had it on video. :thumbup:

 

 

Nice, I have a nice tacview of it, if I could figure out how to make a video out of it.

Posted
I'd rather prefer to have FC3 planes removed :D

 

So... Lateley there has been an issue with the balance. The F15 has better missiles than the Su-27 and i have been having a good time raping red for the last 2 rounds. And now they have the more balanced missiles i cant have so much fun raping them.

 

Due to this all the most structured players that use SRS have been going blue and the teams are mad stacked.

 

This creates an unfair advantage to the blue team.

 

Please disable F15 and give them F-5's or just place S-300 in a 10 KM grid all over the map.

 

Thank you.

 

If balancing is the reason ill buy the enhanced missiles, but if unlimited su33 lives are real, blue will likely never move further north than Sochi.

To cut the discussion: remove Su-33, Su-27 and F-15 :D. Leave MiG-29 for RED and M-2000C for BLUE.

F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...