Jump to content

In your opinion (hypothetical) what would make LOMAC more realistic?  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. In your opinion (hypothetical) what would make LOMAC more realistic?

    • For better balance why not add the R-77 on Flankers too?
      4
    • Russian missiles are undermodeled. They need better PK in general. American stuff aint that grand.
      4
    • Its as good as it gets. R-27ET is a good weapon balance if used accordingly.
      2
    • Its good even though minor issues should be fixed (specify).
      5
    • I think its optimistic to the US side. (specify)
      1
    • I think its slighly optimistic to the russian side. (specify)
      1
    • Minor issues with AMRAAM, the rest can be left as it is.
      2
    • I would be happy if they only fixed the ECM and radar issues/exploits.
      14
    • Lets Improve AMRAAM & AIM-9. No Standoff ECM bs. Let the RUS fans prove their stuff.
      23


Recommended Posts

Posted

I did not expect the path my previous poll took, so I decided to make this poll to complement the previous one given that the vast majority want the game to be as close as a desktop trainer can be.

 

However despite over 2/3 of the people had voted for such a level of realism one must specify, without any ambiguosities his/her defenition of realism in this SIM.

 

Im sure that within the 70 people or so that constitutes those 2/3 of votes have very different views of what realism is depending of his nationality or virtual hardware they preffer to use.

 

So lets hear it:

.

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

- greatly overlooked: more realistic weather scenarios and the effect of wind on the Planes.

 

- more realistic aircraft behaviour (aerodynamically)

 

- 3d Pit and AFM for all planes

 

- Impoved ground Objects and textures (especially cities)

 

Thats the most important to my experience of realism

 

S!

 

Brati

  • Like 1

"Helicopters can't fly; they're just so ugly the earth repels them." (THX Rich :thumbup: )

 

33rdsignatureimage7klmu6.jpg

Posted

Better Mission Editor (or a dynamic campaign) that would allow for more immersive scenarios

 

Better AI to make above possible

 

Comms + ATC

 

AFM + clickable pits for current ALL flyables

 

WAFM

 

 

 

That should about cover it!! :thumbup:

  • Like 1
Posted

It's a matter of prioritizing the systems you want modelled and how in depth you want to see them. The two reasons I voted realism "lite" was that current and foreseeable future technology simply can't recreate the complexity involved in flight, avionics, weaponry, etc. Secondly, the LOMAC community is small enough without making it tougher for a newcomer to get a foothold on the learning curve.

 

My first priorities would be realistic weaponry and then AFM. It's a long list after that. I would love to see the F-15's MFD actually be an MFD. ATC and AWACS need a lot of work. Avionics in general could be greatly improved as far as complexity/reality. Although I don't see a need for general improvement in graphics, there are a couple of "glitches" that I would like to see addressed. Namely, burning ground objects and fog. But those are way down the list for me.

  • Like 1
Posted

Like so...

 

Fix the missile accuracy, "ESPECIALLY" the american missiles.

 

NAV modes for all TACAN capable aircraft.

 

Comms.

 

Wingmen that arent stupid.

 

More realistic scenarios.

Posted

Field updated, let the voting start But Ill post some explanations for each option. SOme people will wonder what they may mean.

 

Option nº 3 has often been mentioned in these boards as the right counter to AMRAAM so I included it.

 

Option nº 4 may reffer to improvements you will want such such as WFM but without changing seeker properties because thats not possible right now.

.

Posted

- IFF

- AFM for aircraft, missiles, bombs and rockets (including drift etc.)

- more modern 3D sound engine (I feel I cannot hear the engine and wind flow good enough)

- more finished 3D models for F-15/Flanker

- more comms

- FAC/FAC(A) scenario's (ability to place ground assets that paint targets

etc.; buddy lasing, sharing target coordinates, ... )

 

euuuhhh I'm kinda difficult customer it seems ;)

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
That's not realistic. You need guys with sledgehammers and gasoline standing by.

 

Well, that's only if you're badly hurt, going down in flames etc.

Hey!!

denial.jpg
Posted

Way too much to list, but in no particular order- some of my biggest peeves & wishes..

 

Performance. This game does not look soooo good that it should run as badly as it does on some pretty nice systems. Some aspects are breathtaking- a lot of it is not.

 

A.F.M. on everything.

 

Avionics vastly improved in complexity, accuracy, procedures modeling & realism.

 

lots of smaller stuff- like the GAU STILL acting like a reverse thruster on the A-10. The ability to retract the gear on the 39 whilst on the ground. (if this is real behavior.. heh...:megalol: ...)

 

No toe brake axis, roll trim axis does NOT work at all (it centers itself), the weapons mistakes,

Posted

FM of older planes when landing, crashing ect..

Weather move, mass air etc..

Turbulences online.

better individual aircraft FM , right now it's too much scripted teh spin are basicly all identical etc..

Fly it like you stole it..

Posted
Choices in the poll are ... strange. Cannot vote :)

 

Definitely odd. I'm not picking one either.

 

If you consider all the threads complaining about the missiles, coments online and my last poll, these are the most relevant choices for 90% of the people. Listing them all would be phisicaly impossible.

 

I have explained why I opened this poll. Its made after conflicting opinions about what this game should be about. Everything else that needs be fixing is pretty much unanimous and that is not relevant here, this is a debate not an agreeing party.

.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...