Specter1075 Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Screenshots section. All of MBTs. I think Im the first to post this... Been wanting to make a discovery for a while...
thereminqblank Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 The screenies look nice!! No enlargey when I clicky though :cry: "Unholy Roller" [sIGPIC]http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/images/userbars/A-10C_UserBar_01.gif[/sIGPIC]
Specter1075 Posted December 15, 2006 Author Posted December 15, 2006 I noticed that too, but it doesnt hinder our ability to see the detail that has gone into those models. They are very nice looking. I wonder if that reactive armor will break apart when under fire.
thereminqblank Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Yeah, I was thinking "those tanks look so nice, I almost feel ashamed to want to blow them up!" "Unholy Roller" [sIGPIC]http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/images/userbars/A-10C_UserBar_01.gif[/sIGPIC]
TheProphet Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Thats a shame, I can't enlarge them too. 6700K | ASUS Z170 | 32GB RAM | GTX 680 | 850EVO
Force_Feedback Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Just use the russian section, works fine, I bet those models will kill our fps with at least 10 frames :P Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
Starlight Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 apart from saying always the same things, i.e. "again vehicles screenshots, WTF", the damage model of the tanks seems the same... http://www.lockon.ru/img/products/large/2fae0837dcba8b66ba01db5ce0580e4a.jpg it's quite poor if compared to the original model, and it's quite poor even if compared to other sims, like Gunship! from Microprose (2001). In "Gunship!", the turret used to be blown away from the tank. It happens IRL too, if you take a look at the book by Concord, After the Storm: Iraqi Wrecks And Fortifications, it gives you a rough idea of the devastation that can happen in real battles to armored vehicles (and to the poor troops inside). IMHO if the next sim is more mud-oriented, with detailed armored vehicles, it should also better cover the damage aspect. If you hit a jeep or a truck with a missile, it doesn't simply turn into a burning wreck... the vehicle is likely to blow up and fly some dozens feet away, and maybe land upside down... If you hit the tank it can burn or have the turret blown away or it can blow up itself... That's how I see it. Not to be morbid, but that's how things go IRL.
Force_Feedback Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 And think of heat rounds, small hole, lots of smoke, no really visible damage, everyone inside r.i.p. Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
RvETito Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 I have to visit the screenshots section more often. I see the new Mi-24 for the first time, it's looks just outstanding! When have been posted the Hind's screens? "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE=
Piffer Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 Aug, 18: http://pff.blogsome.com/2006/08/18/119/ http://vootatico.com
RvETito Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 That explains why I've missed it. This date brings to my memory nothing but 40'C heat, forest fires and me on board of a Ka-32, flown up to the limit. "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE=
EvilBivol-1 Posted December 15, 2006 Posted December 15, 2006 A few more high-res shots here: http://www.forum.lockon.ru/showpost.php?p=272726&postcount=287 - EB [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Nothing is easy. Everything takes much longer. The Parable of Jane's A-10 Forum Rules
192nd_Erdem Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 apart from saying always the same things, i.e. "again vehicles screenshots, WTF", the damage model of the tanks seems the same... http://www.lockon.ru/img/products/large/2fae0837dcba8b66ba01db5ce0580e4a.jpg it's quite poor if compared to the original model, and it's quite poor even if compared to other sims, like Gunship! from Microprose (2001). In "Gunship!", the turret used to be blown away from the tank. It happens IRL too, if you take a look at the book by Concord, After the Storm: Iraqi Wrecks And Fortifications, it gives you a rough idea of the devastation that can happen in real battles to armored vehicles (and to the poor troops inside). IMHO if the next sim is more mud-oriented, with detailed armored vehicles, it should also better cover the damage aspect. If you hit a jeep or a truck with a missile, it doesn't simply turn into a burning wreck... the vehicle is likely to blow up and fly some dozens feet away, and maybe land upside down... If you hit the tank it can burn or have the turret blown away or it can blow up itself... That's how I see it. Not to be morbid, but that's how things go IRL. I agree fully. Black Shark will be a "boring" sim combat wise if they don't include vehicle damage modelling. This magical "hitpoint" formula is really getting old. Turrets also should be "blown off" when I overkill them, tracks should come off, engine could be damaged. Not to mention different explosion/death animations.
Witchking Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 meh.....I have trying to ask them that for quite a long time. The whole point of me playing old games like comache 4 or apache assault is the fun in watching tanks etc fall apart. Lomac is sooo generic damage model...there is a sense of fun to see a cartwheeling tank turrent....there is a sense of satisfaction in seeing a cartwheeling wheel from the vehicles. it doesn't have to be specific....just random things falling apart from vehicles. that alone will make it feel sooo satisfactory for blowing up stuff. We want to blow up stuff see....STUFF BLOW APART....not just a mushroom cloud. WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro | |A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA|
RvETito Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 A few more high-res shots here: http://www.forum.lockon.ru/showpost.php?p=272726&postcount=287 Are you guys sure that BS will be a flight simulator? :D When I look at these tanks I could easily say that it's a tank sim or looking at the chechens with the Iglas one could think it's a 1st person shooter game. What is it after all??? "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE=
EvilBivol-1 Posted December 16, 2006 Posted December 16, 2006 A great thanks to "GK" for the new tanks, "ZloySkin" for the MANPADs, and "Goliaf26" for the BMP/Ds, among other in-house and community modelers I may not be familiar with. They are all incredible to watch. - EB [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Nothing is easy. Everything takes much longer. The Parable of Jane's A-10 Forum Rules
fragal Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 New BS screens New black shark screenies :thumbup: http://www.lockon.ru/index.php?end_pos=982&scr=products&lang=ru
VMFA117_Poko Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 Is this the new T-72 model made by someone from Lockon community - not ED worker? Or is it made by ED? Looks amazing! EDIT: I'm asking for it because I saw a topic some time ago in "3D models discussion" section on russian part. If that was a person outside the ED team I must say he's very talented and he earned for a big credit.
ED Team Groove Posted December 18, 2006 ED Team Posted December 18, 2006 nice screenshots. but i have a screenshots wish for the next batch: i want to see the t-72 tank model ( exactly this beautiful model from this screenshots) from 3, 6, 9 km distance made from the ka-50 cockpit and also a 6 km distance screenshot seen through the targeting TV screen. THx in advance ! Our Forum Rules: http://forums.eagle.ru/rules.php#en
EagleEye Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 me on board of a Ka-32, flown up to the limit. Yes, hard work for you, but must be cool to fly with such a thing.:) Nice to see all those new and detailed ground units. Especially on tv-seeker then in the Ka-50.;) Deutsche DCS-Flughandbücher SYSSpecs: i7-4790K @4GHz|GA-Z97X-SLI|16GB RAM|ASUS GTX1070|Win10 64bit|TrackIR5|TM Warthog/Saitek Pro Pedals
192nd_Erdem Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=20235
Vekkinho Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 What will be FPS hit with details like that on the t-72?!! When I make a high speed pass over few T-72 they'll look like matchboxes but my comp will suffer FPS drops! Or should I spend another 2000$ for a new rig to just to play BS? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Alfa Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 Thread merger.. Fragal's "New BS screens" thread merged with this one. - JJ. JJ
Recommended Posts