Just a thought

[72westy]

Given that FC3 is a simplified version of DCS 2+ it would be nice if the developers would/could adapt a version for either PS4 or Xbox. Could open an added stream of revenue. The hardware of either is certainly capable today. I know quite a few of us have consoles.

Edited December 21, 2017 by 72westy

[cichlidfan]

Waste of developer resources. Also, are your joystick and pedals compatible with your console gaming system?

[Winterz]

Waste of developer resources.

 

This

[Mtnbiker1998]

Along with what the others have said, the lack of clickable pits OR a keyboard for the myriad of switches would make it unplayable. And a clickable cockpit wouldn't be much better on a gamepad. I don't think DCS is feasible on consoles without A LOT of simplification.

Edited December 24, 2017 by Mtnbiker1998
Typo

[72westy]

I'm fairly certain that one can use a keyboard and mouse now on the newer Xbox console. I know I have no issue using one thru my Steam link combined with the Steam controller and/or joystick.

[72westy]

Along with what the others have said, the lack of clickable pits OR a keyboard for the myriad of switches would make it unplayable. And a clickable cockpit wouldn't be much better on a gamepad. I don't think DCS is feasible on consoles without A LOT of simplification.

 

Flaming Cliffs 3

[probad]

wrong audience to cater to

[HiJack]

Flight simulation for console is waste of time. This is not a game.

 

Edit: Buy crimson skies, a game.

[LeCuvier]

no way, I would not trade my rig for a playstation or X-Box

[QuiGon]

Apart from the problems already mentioned, I don't think a console can handle the simulation of DCS performance wise. It would at least require an awful lot of work to adjust the DCS engine to console requirements -> waste of developer resources.

[PeaceSells]

Do consoles even have enough buttons to operate a DCS FC3 plane?

[Xenovia]

No one in the console world would buy it, waste of time and resources that could be spent elsewhere, improving DCS.