DennisGR Posted September 10, 2019 Posted September 10, 2019 Yes. Block 70 = F-16V. Greece,Bulgaria,Slovakia first three ΑΙΕΝ ΥΨΙΚΡΑΤΕΙΝ
mvsgas Posted September 10, 2019 Posted September 10, 2019 Yes. Block 70 = F-16V. Greece,Bulgaria,Slovakia first three Like all F-16 upgrades and modification this is also be fill with confusion. F-16V will not only be newly built "block 70" but upgraded older blocks as well. ROCAF is calling their F-16A block 20 upgrade as F-16V. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
smire666 Posted September 11, 2019 Posted September 11, 2019 Like all F-16 upgrades and modification this is also be fill with confusion. F-16V will not only be newly built "block 70" but upgraded older blocks as well. ROCAF is calling their F-16A block 20 upgrade as F-16V. That's right. The Greece F16 will be "only" upgraded to Block70. Newbuilt ones will be ours and Bulgarian. But we have to wait, until the A/C for Oman will be produced :pilotfly:
Geraki Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 DCS does not need block70 right now we need a realistic FM and avionics USAF CCIP Block50 F-16 and for feature HAF F-16 Block50 variant avionics / THK block50 MLU users e.t.c module update
smire666 Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 I know, I was just commenting mvsgas' s post :)
CarbonFox Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 It's unfortunate in my view the USAF or NG units won't be getting the F-16V. F/A-18C; A-10C; F-14B; Mirage 2000C; A-4E; F-16C; Flaming Cliffs 3
Airhunter Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 It's unfortunate in my view the USAF or NG units won't be getting the F-16V. Well, the 16V seems to be a bridge between 4th and 5th gens to some extent. Why spend money on something that does things only marginally better than existing F-16's?
DeathAngel1 Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 Well, the 16V seems to be a bridge between 4th and 5th gens to some extent. Why spend money on something that does things only marginally better than existing F-16's? Because its not true. F-16V blk.70/72 will be way better than blk.50/52. It will be almost like F-35. ..:NAVY PILOTS ARE THE THE BEST PILOTS:..
mvsgas Posted September 12, 2019 Posted September 12, 2019 Guys, we all have derail this thread enough, non of this is related to DCS F-16, let go here https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4034956&postcount=1360 to continue the conversation To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
Bananabrai Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 Hi there, sorry if this has been asked before. Does the F-16 we get also feature a terrain avoidance radar mode, which we could use at least for manual flight, like in the Viggen and A-4? I'm not talking about the TFR, I sadly know its not going to happen, as the FLIR isn't. As I understand, such a mode is "planned" for the F-18. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3285514&postcount=13 Sensors: A/A radar with TWS, SCAN RAID, AZ/EL A/G radar with MAP, EXP1, EXP2, EXP3, SEA, GMT, PVU, AGR, IRA, and TA AN/ASQ-228 ATFLIR Targeting Pod Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) Link-16 AWW-13 Datalink Pod NVGs Other question: What else is there to be expected as in comparison to this entire list of features for the Hornet? What weapons could there be, except from the ones already mentioned in the sticky thread. Alias in Discord: Mailman
mvsgas Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 AFAIK, The APG-68V5 did not have terrain avoidance mode in the USAF F-16 block 50 circa 2007 after CCIP. To whom it may concern, I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that. Thank you for you patience. Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..
The Falcon Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 Has anyone forgotten the new audio technology that will be implemented with the F16 release? I would like to see some videos about it :)
razo+r Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 It won't come with the F-16, but to an unknown date into DCSW. Or what audio technology are you talking about?
The Falcon Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 Some time ago a post of wags(don't remeber) came out where you could hear a test (F16) of a new audio technology
The Falcon Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) Found If someone gave me the link where we talk about this new audio technology would be nice Edited September 20, 2019 by BIGNEWY fixed youtube
MrAMRAAM Posted September 19, 2019 Posted September 19, 2019 These Viper sounds are Awesome! So excited. F-16 Driver Wannabe [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
The Falcon Posted September 19, 2019 Posted September 19, 2019 These Viper sounds are Awesome! So excited. It should be a new technology but I can't find where ED talks about it. However the sound of the video is just a presentation.
mwd2 Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 We need an update in Planned F-16C Systems and Payloads (https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=241132) - from the description text under the last video, we will get the Mk 82 Snake Eyes :music_whistling: Playing: DCS World Intel i7-13700KF, 64GB DDR5 @5600MHz, RTX 4080 ZOTAC Trinity, WIN 11 64Bit Prof. Squadron "Serious Uglies" / Discord-Server: https://discord.gg/2WccwBh Ghost0815
The Falcon Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 (edited) RWR has been fixed Don't you think that the geometries and textures of the cockpit/instruments are a bit ugly? Edited September 21, 2019 by The Falcon fixed youtube
=4c=Nikola Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 Can I set RWR on MFD and/or on HUD? Dedicated RWR display is obscured by UFC, really not ergonomic design. Do not expect fairness. The times of chivalry and fair competition are long gone.
razo+r Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 No you can't. But you should see enough from the default head position.
_mu110_ Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 No you can't. But you should see enough from the default head position. Do you know if loading HARMS or having the HTS equipped gives you an MFD page with better capability to locate SAM contacts or is targeting somehow done through the RWR? Check out my skins and mods on the User Files.
Geraki Posted September 21, 2019 Posted September 21, 2019 As reference , Curson movement and ICP time count down fixed BUT!!! in curson, we need three reference colours White for High scan altitude, Red for negative scan altitude e.g -9 and Blue for positive altiture scan. but it is WIP
Recommended Posts