SVK_Fox Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 One of our teammates flew on HL (SVK_Teddy) and this is ACMI http://rapidshare.com/files/50856268/Tacview-20070822-200529.txt.zip.html check time 10:52:54 - 10:53:24 :joystick: and plane SVK_Teddy AMRAAM is pretty agille isnt it ? ? ? I know this is pretty funny :smilewink: so please improove AIM120
3Sqn_Fudd Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Wow... I watched that... Incredible... Explanations anyone? Random number generator? LOL... I Digress... 1 http://3sqn.com/forum/ Here's to 1.13 -- > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0488djMDBU
Ice Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Ive seen it before. Its happened to me. Just one of those things. Its very rare. Maybe lag related.
GGTharos Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 AIM-120 is definitely undermodeled. So are a bunch of other missiles :) 3 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
3Sqn_Sven Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 Hey GG, quit hogging all the rep, nothing left for the rest of us. I mean, 21?? Gees... :-) 2 3Sqn - Largest distributor of Flanker, Fulcrum and Frogfoot parts in the Black Sea Region
Force_Feedback Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 And whining about aim-120 and F-15 too Plenty of other stuff that needs some good fixing as well, so whine about those too. Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
Geier Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 AIM-120 is definitely undermodeled. So are a bunch of other missiles :) Exactly:thumbup: 1
nscode Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 MiG-21 is very undermodeled 1 Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
rogue_blade Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 And whining about aim-120 and F-15 too Plenty of other stuff that needs some good fixing as well, so whine about those too. f15 comes first [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
192nd_Erdem Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 AMRAAM and F-15 is cleary and without a doubt undermodelled. Even in the back of the box it says: Key features: *Unseen graphical effects bleh bleh bleh . . . *AMRAAM and F-15 is undermodelled clearly. . . . 1
3Sqn_Sven Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 AMRAAM and F-15 is cleary and without a doubt undermodelled. Even in the back of the box it says: Key features: *Unseen graphical effects bleh bleh bleh . . . *AMRAAM and F-15 is undermodelled clearly. . . . LOL! But seriously I'm firmly with GG in the "fix the 15" camp. 3Sqn - Largest distributor of Flanker, Fulcrum and Frogfoot parts in the Black Sea Region
3Sqn_Fudd Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 But seriously I'm firmly with GG in the "fix the 15" camp. Do you make S'mores Sandwiches around that camp fire? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S'more :) http://3sqn.com/forum/ Here's to 1.13 -- > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0488djMDBU
Geier Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 BTH, I saw the F15C flight today on MAKS airshow... It really sounds like a thunder - more lauder then Mig29 and Mig35 and Mig29K
192nd_Erdem Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 BTH, I saw the F15C flight today on MAKS airshow... It really sounds like a thunder - more lauder then Mig29 and Mig35 and Mig29K I beg your pardon, but how this relates to this thread? I have just been in a terrible traffic jam over here BTW. Ferdammt taxi drivers . . . Oh what were we talking about ? Oh yes, AMRAAM is way undermodelled. 1
STRIKER Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 How many times has the topic of the 120/F15 and its radar been talked about....to many times! Its beyond beating a dead horse. Anyone who has been in hanging out in these forums knows that anything people say, whether it be problems or even solutions to these issues arent going to be solved anytime soon to say the very least. I have yet to hear a response from the dev's on these topics. That doesnt mean they're not working on it but they sure arent talking about it in here with us. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Rhen Posted August 25, 2007 Posted August 25, 2007 ... the thrust seems pretty accurate. Then you'd be wrong. http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=22546 Yo-Yo's already said that he promises to fix this.
Yeniceri Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 What about Walms F-15.. i thougt it was OK!!.. [sIGPIC]http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa200/misikci/41-imza-1.jpg[/sIGPIC] "To infinity...and beyond!.." SIM-MOD Modeler TURK!
Frostie Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 I don't know if the info for F-15 is classified but as far as the AMRAAM is concerned, im quite positive its not possible to achieve a spec item, so why drum on about it? Nothing works as in RL in this 'game' AFAIK and about 99.99% of people on these forums have never flown or fired any of these weapons so WTF do they know? "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 'Red 5'. Lord Flashheart 51st PVO "Bisons" - 100 KIAP Regiment Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
D-Scythe Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 I don't know if the info for F-15 is classified but as far as the AMRAAM is concerned, im quite positive its not possible to achieve a spec item, so why drum on about it? Nothing works as in RL in this 'game' AFAIK and about 99.99% of people on these forums have never flown or fired any of these weapons so WTF do they know? It's not possible to achieve a spec item for ANYTHING that's modelled in Lock On. Why attempt to be realistic at all then? Why even develop "simulations"? Hell, Lock On and Falcon 4.0 are just big wastes of money, everyone should just buy Ace Combat. Wait, not even, let's all buy Battlefield 2 and have a huge battle with their infantry and tanks and aircraft and never complain about realism at all.
Frostie Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Simulations try to mimic RL, as simulations go this is a poor one, Ive flown LOMAC for over 3 years but I certainly don't believe I could jump into a Flanker and fly it round the block a couple of times because of the huge gulf between realism and games. You can't suggest something be made realistic when you have nothing constructive to base it on, it will just be an ongoing story of never being realistic. "[51☭] FROSTIE" #55 'Red 5'. Lord Flashheart 51st PVO "Bisons" - 100 KIAP Regiment Fastest MiG pilot in the world - TCR'10 https://100kiap.org
D-Scythe Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Simulations try to mimic RL, as simulations go this is a poor one, Ive flown LOMAC for over 3 years but I certainly don't believe I could jump into a Flanker and fly it round the block a couple of times because of the huge gulf between realism and games. Except that commercial PC combat simulations never aim to achieve that affect - that is, having the user be able to cold start a jet fighter and take off. This is not and never was how "realism" is defined. That's a weak argument. You can't suggest something be made realistic when you have nothing constructive to base it on, it will just be an ongoing story of never being realistic. Nothing constructive to base it on? I'm pretty sure there has been PLENTY of evidence to suggest that all doppler radar missiles should be immune to chaff, because chaff produces no doppler. Furthermore, as this isn't a million dollar military sim, realism doesn't have to be black and white - it's not a question if something is absolutely realistic, or not. What happened to degrees of realism? A commercial PC sim should never aim to achieve anything more than being realistic enough so that the user can play the experience of air combat in a realistic fashion. This can be achieved without being perfectly realistic. Your point of "stuff being an ongoing story of never being realistic" is irrelevant because a PC sim like Lock On never aimed to achieve realism in the first place, but rather to portray the air combat experience in a realistic manner. PC sims are never a 1:1 replica of reality, and why should they be? F-15s never fight against Su-27s IRL, the Cold War ended without a single shot being fired in anger, S300s have never fired a shot against U.S. aircraft IRL...how boring would a perfectly realistic combat simulation be if there was never any combat? 2
Pilotasso Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 In my last session one of my 120's got decoyed by flares. Realistic? HAHA! .
192nd_Erdem Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 Yeah, were you dreaming during that session?
Recommended Posts