Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/30/2023 at 9:05 AM, Kazansky222 said:

The Soviets had the 1521st Aviation Base which had their elite Aggressor squadron, you can think of it as their "Topgun" or "Fighter Weapons School"

But when they operated Mig-23ML variants they were known to outfly their students flying the Mig-29.

Hello, 

Авиабаза 1521, Мары sent me to clear a couple of things up.

Mary-1 “aggressors” were flying the following aircraft:
In the early 70s MiG-21PFM, SM, UM and in 1974 - MiG21Bis.
Since the fall of 1975, the 2nd squadron on the MiG23M/UB (non-woven blue with white edging, camouflage since 1979)
MiG-23MLD was flown since 1984,
The MiG-29 9.12 was adopted from 1989 for the 1st squadron and from 1991 for the 2nd squadron.


Here is the original post about airbase Mary: 

 

🕯️ 🙏
 

m_mn7AzYgGs.jpg

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Авиабаза 1521, Мары - Центр боевого применения | Airbase 1521, Mary - Combat Operations Center

 

Авиабаза_1521_Мары_logo_extra_sm.png

  • 2 months later...
Posted
2 hours ago, pepin1234 said:

Any hopes revived for this module? Could be possible see it in the store soon? 

Its a Razbam module, and due to the financial dispute with ED its on hold.

Last thing we saw before, was radar on HUD with ground clutter.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

What a pity that this is on hold... would be such a great module for Mig-21 fans.

Mig29-A doesn't really fill it (and lacks the beauty of soviet blueish cockpit if I'm not mistaken).

  • Like 3
Posted

Yes its a shame - I really like the MiG-21 and was looking forward to the 23 to round out some of the Soviet fighters (albeit from the sounds of it was it was going to be a handful and probably disappoint a few people who liked to turn and burn)

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/21/2024 at 2:26 PM, Oesau said:

Yes its a shame - I really like the MiG-21 and was looking forward to the 23 to round out some of the Soviet fighters (albeit from the sounds of it was it was going to be a handful and probably disappoint a few people who liked to turn and burn)

Friends, please stop kicking this dead man/aircraft, he is already stiff and almost buried six feet under. 😄 the same with the eurofighter, is dead in the pond too!

  • Like 5
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

At this point only chance is ED doing it themselves. RB devs left DCS for paid jobs.

  • Like 4

ППС  АВТ 100 60 36  Ф <  |  >  !  ПД  К

i5-10600k/32GB 3600/SSD NVME/4070ti/2560x1440'32/VPC T-50 VPC T-50CM3 throttle Saitek combat rudder

Posted
40 minutes ago, Volator said:

Yes, I agree, and that's how I interpret the statement by Kate.

 

2 hours ago, Кош said:

At this point only chance is ED doing it themselves. RB devs left DCS for paid jobs.

If ED is going to make one themselves, why not make the MiG-23MLD instead of the MLA?

  • Like 2

qLjvyQ3.png

My Adorable Communist Errand Girls  🙂

Led by me, the Communist Errand Panda 🥰

Posted

Nobody said anything yet about which variant will be created. Heck, we don't even have a solid confirmation that a MiG-23 is coming to DCS in the foreseeable future. I wouldn't get too excited unless the MiG-23 is officially announced, so I don't want to start debating which variant ED should create. Let me just say this: I get it that some people always want the latest and best version of any plane, but I'd prefer a variant that was in widespread use instead. So ML(A) all the way!

  • Like 5
Posted
13 hours ago, Volator said:

Nobody said anything yet about which variant will be created. Heck, we don't even have a solid confirmation that a MiG-23 is coming to DCS in the foreseeable future. I wouldn't get too excited unless the MiG-23 is officially announced, so I don't want to start debating which variant ED should create. Let me just say this: I get it that some people always want the latest and best version of any plane, but I'd prefer a variant that was in widespread use instead. So ML(A) all the way!

Nope, it's not about having the best variant. It's about the vortex generators. They made the MLD a better dogfight jet than its brother variants. And that means more fun.  🙂 

  • Like 2

qLjvyQ3.png

My Adorable Communist Errand Girls  🙂

Led by me, the Communist Errand Panda 🥰

Posted

Forget it guys. This projec ist dead. As far as I can see it, the same goes for any other RedFor plane. DCS is mor or less a BlueFor only flight sim. (Which is the reason DCS set dust on my Hard Drive since years now.) Sad but true it seems.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

                                                                    forum.png

Posted
13 минут назад, pepin1234 сказал:

I don’t use this Sim anymore. I will not buy anything for DCS unless ED change his policy for RU planes. 

mig29 will come. sales are unlikeli to be like F16/18. after all, 16 and 18 are new models, not aircraft from 80s.hope is on su27/33 and chinese/indian aircraft from russian. but they will not even be close in capabilits to blue side. unfortunatli, that is true. 60-80s aircraft remain, and they will be boughta little less, than advertised "cool" 16/15/18

 

IMG_2572 (1) (1).jpg

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...