Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let's imagine ED is planning an FC2025 package, name one Blue and one Red plane you'd like it to include.

I'll start with:

Blue - F-105

Red - Su-30SM

  • Like 2
Posted

F16a

Mig25

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat 

Posted

I hope they do Full Fidelity aircraft first.

  • Like 1

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted
7 minutes ago, draconus said:

I hope they do Full Fidelity aircraft first.

Me too, but if these were relatively easy to do, it might widen the usage of DCS, bring in more players and thus help fund future full fidelity modules.

7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr_sukebe said:

if these were relatively easy to do

But they're not.

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted

F-14 / SU-32

PC specs:

Intel Core i7-13700K [Raptor Lake 3.4GHz Sixteen-Core LGA 1700] (stock clock)/64.0 GB RAM/RTX 3080 GPU (stock clock)/Windows 10 Home/Multiple M.2 SSD Drives/T.Flight HOTAS X/HP Reverb G2

Posted
39 minutes ago, draconus said:

But they're not.

I’ll leave that assessment to a DCS developer.

7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr_sukebe said:

I’ll leave that assessment to a DCS developer.

We know that already from the interviews with them.

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted

I dont like this polarization that everything have to be either FC or FF, why not make medium fidelity relatively mdern red aircraft with clickable cockpit, but not as sophisticated as Hornet at the beggining, with maybe paid or free update/upgrade coming later?

  • Like 1
Posted

What i see from the way those latest aircraft where added is that ED could now do version of any of their modules as a FC planes, like we will have the MiG-29 in a reverse way soon. So if a plane comes out as a module it can very reasonably become a FC add-on and the other way around too with the existing FC planes. 

Posted

I would love to see dedicated ECM platform as well as transport/AWACS.

i5-4690K CPU 3.50Ghz @ 4.10GHz; 32GB DDR3 1600MHz; GeForce GTX 1660 Super; LG IPS225@1920x1080; Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB; Windows 10 Pro

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

ED could charge 29.99$ for a nice FC level Su-27SM/2/3 or Su-27SKM and it would sell like hot cakes.
 
Fully clickable and all systems modelled would be a dream. But reality is that ED can't do it.
And at some point they will run out of aircrafts to model at full fidelity anyways, so I see no issue
with additional FC projects to supplement the full fidelity products.

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

For the Blue/NATO side, there's a couple of aircraft I would like to see. From the top of my head, and considering the chances of having the most advanced types like the F-22 and F-35 are practically ZERO, I would say the F-117 Nighthawk, or an Eurofighter 2000/Typhoon, or a JAS-39 Gripen could be interesting choices.

For the Red/Russian/Eastern side, same considerations regarding most advanced 4+ gens, I would go for the SU-34 and the 35, or perhaps the MiG-35, maybe one of the chinese 4th gen J-family (we already have the J-11, so why not the J-10, J-15 or J-16?)

Another possibility I see as a fertile ground for future Flaming Cliffs modules would be the 3rd Gen and early 4th Gen aircraft, we even gotten the F-5 and the MiG-15 and F-86 (are these  last two 3rd gen? 🤔). And I also like the idea of a multicrew Flaming Cliffs module. The SU-34 would be the PERFECT candidate for test-fitting that feature.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

AMD Ryzen 7 1700 @3.6GHz | Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 8GB | HyperX Fury 16GB RAM @2666MHz | ASUS Prime B-350 Plus | OCZ Fatal1ty 750W PSU | Kingston UV400 120GB SSD | 1.25TB HDD Total | NZXT Phantom Black Full-Tower ATX Case | Saitek-Mad Catz F.L.Y.5 Flight Stick + Xbox 360 Controller + Keyboard + Mouse Combo for DCS | FreeTrack + PS3 Eye + 3-LED clip Combo for headtracking

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/26/2024 at 6:42 AM, WilliamLink said:

And I also like the idea of a multicrew Flaming Cliffs module

wont happen, you cant run two instances of FC in the same plance, thats why we cant add proper Multicrew to the Su-30 mod currently.
I believe its due to how the system is set up, and making it multicrew is going to be way too complicated for a FC type plane

I have 600GB in skins in my Saved Games. 200GB of that is probably made by myself.
Check out my DCS UserFiles section
Join the Official Deka Ironwork Simulations discord server!

image.png

Posted
11 hours ago, Wyvern said:

wont happen, you cant run two instances of FC in the same plance, thats why we cant add proper Multicrew to the Su-30 mod currently.
I believe its due to how the system is set up, and making it multicrew is going to be way too complicated for a FC type plane

Not that I like the idea but there's absolutely no technical problem if it works in FF modules already.

  • Like 1

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted
7 hours ago, draconus said:

Not that I like the idea but there's absolutely no technical problem if it works in FF modules already.

Yes, thats because the Multicrew FF planes are set up to work this way. But FC3/24 is different, the system is not made for that.
You would have to remake the FC3 systems from scratch.
The way I understood it, is that the each mode is a component that occupies a slot.
If you add a second player to it, you would have lets say Player 1 TWS mode, which then conflicts with player 2 TWS mode, since the two player's systems are sending different signals/inputs, causing the plane to be confused, since its being told to do 2 different things at the same time

I have 600GB in skins in my Saved Games. 200GB of that is probably made by myself.
Check out my DCS UserFiles section
Join the Official Deka Ironwork Simulations discord server!

image.png

Posted
1 hour ago, Wyvern said:

Yes, thats because the Multicrew FF planes are set up to work this way. But FC3/24 is different, the system is not made for that.

Of course it's not made for that because these are single seaters and they are also separate aicraft so the new two seater would just be another completely independent module. Nothing has to be rewritten.

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

  • 4 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...