Alper22 Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 (edited) Hi guys. We start working on new experimental plane of NASA. Im not thinking to make damage models. Instead of I will improve the 3d model. Thanks textures for 141st_c@sper. It will be replace the Su-33. Hope you guys like it. Best regards. Edited September 6, 2009 by Alper22 "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and birds in the sky"
john_X Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 very good idea. but you could talk to walmis or borchi to make a new mod including their f-15C, this nasa f15 and (by modifying this one) a f15D or E.and to insert all of them in one single mod like virevolte tigrou did with the gripen....its just an idea...
Alper22 Posted September 6, 2009 Author Posted September 6, 2009 Yes its good idea. We can talk about it. "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and birds in the sky"
Alexrey Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 That F-15 (SMTD?) should have rectangular nozzles shouldn't it?
Alper22 Posted September 6, 2009 Author Posted September 6, 2009 No. F-15 SMTD and Active have different nozzles. It have vector thrust system like Su-35. "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and birds in the sky"
Laud Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 Please don't feel offended, but thinking out loud I ask myself why modders bring the strangest AC to LO instead of reworking the existing units to bring the sim to a higher level?? Not everything must be flyable to be a worthy feature! (This is not especially directed to you Alper!! It just happened in your thread... :music_whistling: ) However... Best luck with this project!!! :thumbup: S! 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
Mustang Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 Please don't feel offended, but thinking out loud I ask myself why modders bring the strangest AC to LO instead of reworking the existing units to bring the sim to a higher level?? Not everything must be flyable to be a worthy feature! (This is not especially directed to you Alper!! It just happened in your thread... :music_whistling: ) However... Best luck with this project!!! :thumbup: S! I kinda agree with you here (a new Su-33 model anyone?) But whatever the case, i'm apprieciative of any work the modders bring to this community :thumbup:
Alper22 Posted September 6, 2009 Author Posted September 6, 2009 Good point Laud. But i allways prefer to make unique aircrafts. Already some people bring higher level to units.(F-15,Su-27,Mig-29,A-10) And that was a mistake to wait all things from the mod teams. Eagle Dynamics MUST support the mod capability of that game. Else people continue making strange units/aircrafts to game and continue solace themselfs. "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and birds in the sky"
wildcat EAF51 Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 I prefear the original F15 anyway have nice work! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I'm Fighter pilot not a murderer!
Laud Posted September 6, 2009 Posted September 6, 2009 I mean the non-flyables. Just look at the C-130, C-17, Su-24, and so on and so on... It's a pain to watch them! But as mentioned before: I do also apprieciate each piece of work one brings to the game! I just felt the need to throw this point into the room... Great you all didn't take it offensive! TY [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200 Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD) TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5
TOMCATZ Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 Hello, I like it a lot. I should be a nice aircraft for airshows just like VFAT. A little lovely single display world be pretty nice. I constructed an F-15StrikeEagle in the past an its nice to show some upgrades of the Eagle family. Think the western aircrafts are a little bit under represented while we have 3 Mig variants and two Flanker jets. Allthough eastern jets have a great design :) Oh ... sorry - dreamed . Anyways - Nice work up to here:thumbup: Very best wishes TOM Born to fly but forced to work.
Kuky Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 I completely agree with Laud, making a model of some experimental aircraft is insane and waste of time and talent (if the modeler has such talent). I thought this first time I saw the thread and wanted to post but thought it would be too harsh, but seriously... for me personally I wouldn't care how good and nice the model becomes I would not get it because it fits nowhere in the game so there is no point to have it... anyway, sorry if again I sound harsh but that's how I feel. PC specs: Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC 360 AIO | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 AIO | 55" Samsung Odyssey Gen 2 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD for OS | 2TB M2 SSD for DCS | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | TM Cougar Throttle, Floor Mounted MongoosT-50 Grip on TM Cougar board, MFG Crosswind, Track IR
71st_Mastiff Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 can we get the current models fixed like the flashing weapons fire I cant see the gun fire through the skin textures.. i.e. .the mig29 theres no gunsmoke and no flash from the muzzel.. "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
TOMCATZ Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 (edited) Well, yes. Okay- there are many things to do to upgrade parts of LOMAC. Specially some aircrafts and helicopters. But I allways on the point that if it is an modded aircraft nearly the original LOMAC fighter- them it should be okay. So for examble the switching between F-15c and E-version. (And dammed- I`ll do it if I will find out a way to drob bombs with it!) Well - Should be okay for 9.982 polygons InGame graphic: Cheers, TOM Edited September 15, 2009 by TOMCATZ Born to fly but forced to work.
Szelma Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 (edited) Cool stuff Tomcatz ! When it will be ready for realase ? P.S Who deleted my last post ? Edited September 15, 2009 by Szelma
Luse Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 Tom, awesome model ! I believe you have just made my entire day. STT Radar issue is leftover code.
Blaze Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 (edited) Awesome models Alpher and TOMCATZ! As always, absolutely fantastic job! :thumbup: Edited September 15, 2009 by Blaze i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. "
lomcevac Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 Nice model! It looks a little off around the canopy, nose and aft end. But HEY! It looks nice nonetheless! Here's some pictures to compare: Air Force Four-Five, it appears your engine has...oh, disregard...I see you've already ejected
joey45 Posted September 15, 2009 Posted September 15, 2009 The two seater does look nicer then the single seater... The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
TOMCATZ Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Hi, thanks a lot. I was a little bit confuse after I saw last postet pics `course I use very detailed prints. In photos the canopy section looks a little bit higher. Isn`t it possible that Airforce modifyed their cockpit section after after they becam some heavy problems with breaking spants while flying, is it? Otherwise I have to modify it as well. Thanks a lot, TOM Born to fly but forced to work.
Alper22 Posted September 16, 2009 Author Posted September 16, 2009 Pretty cool model TOMCATZ. :) Just like all of your other models. "Let my armies be the rocks, and the trees, and birds in the sky"
lomcevac Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Hi, thanks a lot. I was a little bit confuse after I saw last postet pics `course I use very detailed prints. In photos the canopy section looks a little bit higher. Isn`t it possible that Airforce modifyed their cockpit section after after they becam some heavy problems with breaking spants while flying, is it? Otherwise I have to modify it as well. Thanks a lot, TOM AFAIK, the canopy on the E is exactly the same as the B/D except for some extra duct work from environmental controls to cool avionics and the lack of a manual release latch on the right side of the inside of the canopy that's present in the A/C models. I think the reason why the canopy sometimes looks more bulbous (like a bubble), is parallax because it's usually shot from ground level, or from above, and rarely directly level. These pics are close to level - you can see that the canopy rails are level on either side. Air Force Four-Five, it appears your engine has...oh, disregard...I see you've already ejected
TOMCATZ Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Yeah - thats it. Cool - thanks. It should be allways a question of view angle to object. If somebody out there who remind about "F-15 StrikeEagleIII" by "Microprose". In this game the user had the option to fly as pilot or weapon system operator. Think that would be a great option for DCS someday. Su -30MKK against F-15E -hell that should rock:punk::punk: Thanks a lot, Best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work.
Szelma Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Tomcatz when I see Mudhen, I have a problem with breathing :thumbup: Please show us more and more screenshots of your Bejb... We focus on all elements and help you if you wont Grate job mate :thumbup:
TOMCATZ Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 Hello, Szelma! Actually I won`t force this project because some other guys started the same one but much more acurate and a lot better. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=45153&page=3 The point is that I won`t crash into other projects and I have to respect other hard workings. So for now I see - LOMAC is on a good way fully of great visions. My very best wishes, TOM Born to fly but forced to work.
Recommended Posts