SnakeBite Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 How about a highly detailed DYNAMIC campaign instead of a plane? Core i7 930 @ 4.2GHz | 6GB Tri-Channel Corsair | XMS 9-9-9-24 @ 1758MHz | Corasir TX750W PSU | Acer P224 24" LCD | LG FL. Slim 19" LCD | Antec 1200 FT case | 1x 560GTX eVGA - 11x 8800GT as Ph. | WD Black Edition 1TB HDD | WD Black Edition 500GB HDD | Maxtor 80GB (Kubuntu64) | Saitek X-52 | Saitek Pro Flight Rudders | TIR 4 Pro w/Clip Pro | Thrustmaster MFD's
GGTharos Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 How about no :) How about a highly detailed DYNAMIC campaign instead of a plane? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
SnakeBite Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 How about no :) lol.. How about why? Core i7 930 @ 4.2GHz | 6GB Tri-Channel Corsair | XMS 9-9-9-24 @ 1758MHz | Corasir TX750W PSU | Acer P224 24" LCD | LG FL. Slim 19" LCD | Antec 1200 FT case | 1x 560GTX eVGA - 11x 8800GT as Ph. | WD Black Edition 1TB HDD | WD Black Edition 500GB HDD | Maxtor 80GB (Kubuntu64) | Saitek X-52 | Saitek Pro Flight Rudders | TIR 4 Pro w/Clip Pro | Thrustmaster MFD's
Pilotasso Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 You already have a good dynamic campaign (for which not everybody can afford the time through it) with plenty bad graphics, bad flight modeling in F4 series. Time for something new. .
power5 Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 Must be pretty simple to make a DC. When you get it finished please share it with us. :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Aaron i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5 BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109
MTFDarkEagle Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 i'll take a new dcs fidility(*) aircraft over a dynamic campaign any day *not sure I spelled that right... Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread
Poor mans sniper Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 fidility(*) *not sure I spelled that right... Fidelity:music_whistling:
ΗΟLΙDΛΥ Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 No questions asked, hands down I think DCS/ED would definately make a killing if they did DCS:F-16. There is already a huge community waiting for a stable/realistic simulator for this airframe from pit builder's to the entire falcon community. Even with the future release of the mysterious BMS "Super Open Falcon" I don't think making the decision to do the next module as the F-16 would be a bad choice. We have A-10C now with the release of the Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog, and we already have Thrustmaster's Cougar (F-16 Replica HOTAS) as well as Thrustmaster MFD's. I would be very surprised if DCS made the mistake of not providing the community with a quality F-16 simulator. You can't go wrong from a marketing perspective, this will be the biggest thing since DCS:A-10. Also with the unclassified data available for the F-16, as well as multi-role Air to Air, and Air to Ground capabilities this would be a great addition for the next DCS module in my opinion as well as a HUGE amount of other fan's of the F-16 worldwide. -HOLIDAY Η Ο L Ι D Λ Υ™ P R O D U C T I O N S Y O U T U B E I9-9900K @5ghz | EVGA RTX 2080Ti XC Ultra | 32Gb GDDR4 @3600mhz | 2Tb Samsung 970 Evo NVMe M.2
Agg Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 I guess we'll see the next DCS aircraft announced pretty soon, seeing as we are getting closer and closer to the release of Warthog :) And yes, I am crossing my fingers (and toes) for an F-16 ;)
Flim Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 IF DCS is a business and they want to make money, the F-16 will be a sound business decision.
ΗΟLΙDΛΥ Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 I guess we'll see the next DCS aircraft announced pretty soon, seeing as we are getting closer and closer to the release of Warthog :) And yes, I am crossing my fingers (and toes) for an F-16 ;) You can get DCS:A-10C now for pre purchase. I have it as well as alot of members of the SCSimulations community and it's great!!!! I can't wait to see the progress of the beta evolve until the final build is done. I have to say Mat Wagner and team have done an excellent job on this sim. I can't stop flying it and I have been very impressed with this since I bought the pre purchase. I would love to have the F-16 in the same detail with the next release especially with the new Nevada terrain would make for some great Red Flag!!! Η Ο L Ι D Λ Υ™ P R O D U C T I O N S Y O U T U B E I9-9900K @5ghz | EVGA RTX 2080Ti XC Ultra | 32Gb GDDR4 @3600mhz | 2Tb Samsung 970 Evo NVMe M.2
SnakeBite Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 You already have a good dynamic campaign (for which not everybody can afford the time through it) with plenty bad graphics, bad flight modeling in F4 series. Time for something new. Bad flight modeling is true. Bad graphics? It's 11 years old, it's build on DX6. Avionics are the best out, even 11 years later, and it is the most successful combat flight simulator ever released to public. What's the deal with embedding Dynamic Campaign in DCS series. I think that's a key part in the simulator rather than flying pre-planned (dumb) missions. Core i7 930 @ 4.2GHz | 6GB Tri-Channel Corsair | XMS 9-9-9-24 @ 1758MHz | Corasir TX750W PSU | Acer P224 24" LCD | LG FL. Slim 19" LCD | Antec 1200 FT case | 1x 560GTX eVGA - 11x 8800GT as Ph. | WD Black Edition 1TB HDD | WD Black Edition 500GB HDD | Maxtor 80GB (Kubuntu64) | Saitek X-52 | Saitek Pro Flight Rudders | TIR 4 Pro w/Clip Pro | Thrustmaster MFD's
joey45 Posted October 7, 2010 Posted October 7, 2010 A DC is not that easy to make... The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
GGTharos Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Bad flight modeling is true. Bad graphics? It's 11 years old, it's build on DX6. Avionics are the best out, even 11 years later, and it is the most successful combat flight simulator ever released to public. The avionics have been getting updated for over a decade. See the original F4 and tell me how good those avionics are. Don't pretend like it wasn't free development for A LONG FREAKING TIME that saved falcon. And don't pretend like the company that created it didn't go bankrupt, either. F4 is good because there was a huge effort put into it for a huge amount of time post-release, and illegally at that. It is an exception, nothing more. ED is showing you what is achievable commercially ... without breaking your own neck trying to do it. What's the deal with embedding Dynamic Campaign in DCS series. I think that's a key part in the simulator rather than flying pre-planned (dumb) missions. The deal is that they could slap a DC on today and it would suck. There is a whole lot more to making a good DC than just 'slapping a DC on'. I'll let you think on it :D And actually I don't see what your problem with pre-planned missions is. DCs are fairly dumb in their own right. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Python Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 I would love to have the F-16 in the same detail with the next release especially with the new Nevada terrain would make for some great Red Flag!!! Now we have nice Red Flag terrain we need a Harrier and Tornado also :music_whistling: Il settle for F-16 though of course, all in good time :thumbup: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Callsign.Vega Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Has anyone considered that ED doesn't even have a plan for a next module? A-10C came about because they had highly accurate information from the US Air Force Reserve/Guard. If ED doesn't have in depth info or a new sim contract that grants them access, they really can't make a new DCS module yet in the fidelity needed. All I know is A-10C will keep me busy for a long time! GPU: RTX 4090 - 3,000 MHz core / 12,000 MHz VRAM. CPU: 7950X3d - 5.2 GHz X3d, 5.8 GHz secondary / MB: ASUS Crosshair X670E Gene / RAM: G.Skill 48GB 6400 MHz SSD: Intel Optane P5800X - 800GB VR: Pimax Crystal CONTROLS: VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Base / VPC Constellation ALPHA Prime Grip / VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle / TM Pendular Rudders
pringliano Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 The Beech King Air! Imagine missions where you work like a pilot of an Air Ambulance or transporting VIPs, etc :)
GGTharos Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 ED might not have a 'plan' as to which aircraft to do next yet, but they do have material. Has anyone considered that ED doesn't even have a plan for a next module? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
[VAF] Shocker Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 If anything, the Hornet is where its at. Legcay or Super Hornet.
power5 Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Let's hope not. That behind enemy lines documentary I saw with Owen Wilson shows how poor of an aircraft it is. Could not evade a SAM. The sam did have a very long engine ignition though. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Aaron i7 2600k@4.4ghz, GTX1060-6gb, 16gb DDR3, T16000m, Track IR5 BS2-A10C-UH1-FC3-M2000-F18C-A4E-F14B-BF109
Pegaso69 Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 F18/D www.69squadrone.it GigaByte X58A-UD7 rev 2.0 -- Intel i7 950 3.06 Ghz (OC 3.20) -- Geforce GTX 750Ti -- DDR3 Corsair 2000 mhz 12 GB -- HD SSD Crucial 1Tb -- HD WD raptor SATA2 150 GB x 10000 rpm -- Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 800 W -- Windows 7 Professional 64bit -- Hotas Cougar n° 01909 -- Hotas Warthog n° 08070 -- Console MFD self made with X-key -- Monitor DELL 24 Inch please... please... please... let next DCS module be a F18 :worthy: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Kaiza Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Let's hope not. That behind enemy lines documentary I saw with Owen Wilson shows how poor of an aircraft it is. Could not evade a SAM. The sam did have a very long engine ignition though. LOL, I thought the F-18 did well, after all it was almost as fast as the SAM :doh: [url=http://www.aef-hq.com.au/aef4/forumdisplay.php?262-Digital-Combat-Simulator][SIGPIC]http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/2500/a10161sqnsignitureedite.png[/SIGPIC][/url]
sobek Posted October 8, 2010 Posted October 8, 2010 Let's hope not. That behind enemy lines documentary I saw with Owen Wilson shows how poor of an aircraft it is. Could not evade a SAM. The sam did have a very long engine ignition though. You dare mention the words 'Owen Wilson' and 'Documentary' in the same sentence? Heretic :D Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
Recommended Posts