Mikoyan89 Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 (edited) Still in service with the 344th training center in Torzhok,six helicopter left if i'm not wrong...but i don't think it's used for special operations,but just for training purposes P.S: it would be a dream having a DCS ka-52 sim,even a ka-50N upgrade for BS2 it would be nice,but it just cannot have enough market Edited March 19, 2012 by Mikoyan89 YouTube Blog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 What updates? The Ka-50n/sh is Kamov's experimental model, it isn't the military model. The updates at the KA-50 where not big, but decisive for it to become a better Attack Helicopter. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogata321 Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 As far as i know Ka-50/2 are used only by spetsnaz. The Ka-50 production is stopped, cause they are making the better Ka-52. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 What updates? The Ka-50n/sh is Kamov's experimental model, it isn't the military model. Yes but does that mean you cant buy it for millitary use.... Its just the point of view about this:smilewink: And i dont want to start a Discussion about here. Bye Bye N/SH Shark:D "Blyat Naaaaa" - Izlom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 Sure, maybe someone would ... but so far no one seems to want a one-seat attack heli :) Yes but does that mean you cant buy it for millitary use.... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pakster Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 New Jet Should be Added and that would be "Su35BM" I think fascinated me first to play the flying legends or DCS series is RUSSIAN AIRCRAFTS..... Now people here are always wishing adding a new aircraft from the US, HUH ! well not me I m more interested in Russain Air power and believe me they are more interested then US. For my wish list of aircraft to be added to the next DCS or Flying Legend series would diffidently be the SU-35 BM....:pilotfly: JUST CHECK THIS VIDEO OUT BELOW !!! [http://youtu.be/7hjkDlzOddk] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealN Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 The reason why people are talking about american planes is that the only information that has been revealed about the next DCS Jet is that it is american. Doesn't make sense to talk about a russian plane as the next one when it is already known to not be russian. :) Who knows, perhaps after that. But then again, it was a might long time since we saw a simulation of the Tornado... :D [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demongornot Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 I think the SU35 are so modern for a simulator like DCS, Eagle Dynamics make only FULL REALISTIC aircraft and the SU35 are so modern and a lot of data will still classified and can't permit to give a full realistic aircraft finally. I'm not sure but that sound logical to my ear... And like EtherealN say the next aircraft will be a Modern popular US Fixed Wing Fighter Jet. F-14 its not possible due to not fixed wings, old aircraft its not will be possible too (the A10C are coming to service in 2006) so its not possible for F-4 or older, and F-35 and F-22 are so recent, that can only be the F-16 (i don't know various version of the Falcon) the F-15 C/D (o hope no cause only air to air and already in Flaming Cliff) F-15E Strike Eagle (really nice choice where we can fly alone or with bot/another player in MP and like the A10C who coming from the A10A that we have in Flaming Cliff its a possible choice). And my favorite aircraft the F/A-18 Hornet with carrier OPS possibility. and C/D version with ond avionic but the best maneuverability and extreme high alpha or the E/F and less maneuverability and better avionic and global performance. F-16, F-15 or F-18 its the only possibility for the next, but maybe for the aircraft after that yeah that can be nice to see a Russian Aircraft OR another than always Russian and US aircraft, like French Mirage 2000 or Harrier or other nice aircraft, imagine DCS B1 Lancer :p and i'm not joke, this aircraft are awesome and beautiful with extreme performance. But before that the aircraft after the next (if we don't die in end of 2012 xD) must be a Russian Aircraft, SU33, SU30 or Mig29 !!! CPU : I7 6700k, MB : MSI Z170A GAMING M3, GC : EVGA GTX 1080ti SC2 GAMING iCX, RAM : DDR4 HyperX Fury 4 x 8 Go 2666 MHz CAS 15, STORAGE : Windows 10 on SSD, games on HDDs. Hardware used for DCS : Pro, Saitek pro flight rudder, Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog, Oculus Rift. Own : A-10C, Black Shark (BS1 to BS2), P-51D, FC3, UH-1H, Combined Arms, Mi-8MTV2, AV-8B, M-2000C, F/A-18C, Hawk T.1A Want : F-14 Tomcat, Yak-52, AJS-37, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, F-5E, MiG-21Bis, F-86F, MAC, F-16C, F-15E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radar Rider Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 For russian planes than can be at DCS I prefer Su-27, Su-30. Su-33, and over all Su-34, and a new map like Kuriles and Ojotsk Sea with China, Russia, Japan and USA. Navy and Air Force for all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MemphisBelle Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Who knows, perhaps after that. But then again, it was a might long time since we saw a simulation of the Tornado... :D booohhhh...you´re soo mean :D:megalol: BlackSharkDen | BSD Discord | DCS Tutorial Collection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanBoy2006.01 Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 "F-16, F-15 or F-18 its the only possibility for the next,..." I would be glad if we get any of these. But I would prefer F15E over F15C because it's multirole. Then Russian fast jet. That would be the best for multi player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tflash Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 For russian planes than can be at DCS I prefer Su-27, Su-30. Su-33, and over all Su-34, and a new map like Kuriles and Ojotsk Sea with China, Russia, Japan and USA. Navy and Air Force for all. Well if "flight" is what DCS brings to simulation, than Su-27 should be very high on the list indeed. I also like the straightforward avionics, which should be very nice to model in detail in DCS. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 There's nothing straight forward about them. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tflash Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Well, compared to the millions of lines of code in today's avionics, I would say even the Su-27 has straightforward avionics? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 Don't worry, it'll make you pull your hair out just the same :) Millions of code is meaningless, unless by 'straight forward avionics' you mean as in 'I'm the guy who pulls'em out and services them'. To the pilot there's no difference, except that the 'new complicated stuff' you want to imply is actually easier to use and does more. Well, compared to the millions of lines of code in today's avionics, I would say even the Su-27 has straightforward avionics? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tflash Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 OK, I see what you mean: not so straightforward for the pilot, indeed, digital avionics are all about making life easier. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenta Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 OK, I see what you mean: not so straightforward for the pilot, indeed, digital avionics are all about making life easier. Why have them if it would be the other way around :) Failure is the mother of all success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speed Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 (edited) Well, compared to the millions of lines of code in today's avionics, I would say even the Su-27 has straightforward avionics? Simpler, older, less advanced avioincs doesn't mean straightforward avionics. ^^Not avionics, relay logic + wire spaghetti for controlling an industrial machine, but you get the point. The guy servicing that- well, it's almost unservicable. Meanwhile, today, crap like this is replaced by a vastly more capable, PLC bank (basically, a computer with a bunch of I/O ports): Logically more complex, but vastly eaiser to service AND use. And all it takes is a few seconds to reprogram it, instead of a few hours to rewire it. The operator is able to interact with touch-screens and a GUI, rather than a bunch of buttons and switches. Are the guts logically more complex? Yes. Is it easier to use and understand? YES. Sorta like limited, mission editor spaghetti trigger logic vs. clean, concise, capable Lua scripts :D Edited March 21, 2012 by Speed Intelligent discourse can only begin with the honest admission of your own fallibility. Member of the Virtual Tactical Air Group: http://vtacticalairgroup.com/ Lua scripts and mods: MIssion Scripting Tools (Mist): http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=98616 Slmod version 7.0 for DCS: World: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=80979 Now includes remote server administration tools for kicking, banning, loading missions, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealN Posted March 21, 2012 Share Posted March 21, 2012 ^^Not avionics, relay logic + wire spaghetti for controlling an industrial machine, but you get the point. Here's an example from an actual jet fighter then, if you don't mind, to further the point. I present to you: the CK-37: Here's the later replacement, CD-107, to the right of a CK-37 module. A CK-37 module has an MTBF in flight conditions of 200 hours. Funs! (If you thought the random failures thing was annoying in DCS, try flying a real plane. :D ) So getting these things onto an actual cirquit board was a nice thing I imagine. :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIKBELL Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Try to find the broken wire in that mess... There are 2 categories of fighter pilots: those who have performed, and those who someday will perform, a magnificent defensive break turn toward a bug on the canopy. Robert Shaw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebbomann Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 ...F-14 its not possible due to not fixed wings... that's new to me. :thumbup: i5-3570K, 16GB DDR3, GTX660Ti, SSD, Win7 64Bit Warthog Base + Cougar Stick, Cougar Throttle (el cheapo HAL-Mod), MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals, TrackIR 5 Blackshark 1&2, A-10C, P-51, UH-1H, Mi-8MTV2, F86-F, MiG-21Bis, Combined Arms, FC3, Falcon BMS, Rise of Flight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiJack Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 The next DCS aircraft :D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EtherealN Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 that's new to me. :thumbup: News to me as well. :P [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FWind Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 News to me as well. :P News to me isn`t well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Well the wings move so technicaly it is not fixed wing. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts