FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 (edited) Hi guys: I am thinking about buying the FC 2.0 update, but my computer is not all that fast. I can run FC 1.12b with some mods with medium effect pretty well, and I head about FC 2.0 being more FPS friendly (due to the new engine), but is that really true? My 1.12b is doing well speedwise, I just don't wanna make the purchase only to find out that my PC can't run it smoothly. FOr those of you who purchased FC 2.0, is it really more smoothly than 1.1 as claimed by the publisher? Edited March 29, 2010 by FBW
Breakshot Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Id say on average it runs about the same... If you could run FC1 on medium, you should be able to run FC2 just about the same... Also most of the FC1 mods/fps tweaks still apply to FC2 so you can use them, just make sure you backup files before messing around... Tim "Breakshot" Mytrofanov | C.O. of 51 ПВО / 100 КИАП Regiments | twitch.tv/51breakshot
Thunderbird Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 work well for me, i can run with minimum requirement with Nvidia 512Mb
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 Id say on average it runs about the same... If you could run FC1 on medium, you should be able to run FC2 just about the same... Also most of the FC1 mods/fps tweaks still apply to FC2 so you can use them, just make sure you backup files before messing around... That's quite a motivation. I am worried that my PC can't handle it since the graphics did improve.:pilotfly:
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 work well for me, i can run with minimum requirement with Nvidia 512Mb mine is either 128 or 256:thumbup: 1.12 works fine
Kuky Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I'd also say it runs about the same for me Windows 11 Home | Asus TUF Gaming B850-Plus WiFi MB | AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + LC AIO 360 | MSI RTX 5090 LC 360 | 64GB PC5-48000 DDR5 | 1TB M2 SSD x2 | NZXT C1000 Gold ATX 3.1 1000W | HOTAS Cougar+MFG Crosswind ... and waiting on Pimax Crystal Super VR headset & DCS MiG-29A release
Guest Hawk1606687901 Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 It runs faster for me and the good thing is I don't have to use a ton of tweaks.
Sov13t Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Perhaps why some people are noticing an increase while others aren't is because of BS engine taking advantage of multi-core systems, and those that aren't noticing it are running single core? Just a wild guess. Personally for me, it runs smooth... no crashes... and that is lovely. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 51st PVO Regiment | Forum | Statistics DCS: MiG-21Bis
Ven Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Seems to run smoother for me. 1.1, I had to make cfg tweaks and tweak mods to make it run smooth. 2.0 seems to be as smooth as the modded 1.1 right out of the box.
Sarge55 Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I find it runs smooth and maybe a bit faster (time will tell) the only thing that gives my FPS a hit is when I turn on the Shkval. It knocks the count down by at least 20-25 FPS. Which is strange as it's not a problem in BS. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] i7 10700K OC 5.1GHZ / 500GB SSD & 1TB M:2 & 4TB HDD / MSI Gaming MB / GTX 1080 / 32GB RAM / Win 10 / TrackIR 4 Pro / CH Pedals / TM Warthog
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 With this many people vouch for FC 2.0, i think I am sold on this one. 1. Once i install the FC 2.0, does my 1.1 disappear? 2. Does my FC 1.1's version matter? (English, French, Russian...etc) Mine is english.
Ven Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I was wondering about that before I installed. But I installed the original LockOn from the CD and then installed the FC2.0. Didn't apply FC1.1 or any patch. Then uninstalled the LockOn.
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 I was wondering about that before I installed. But I installed the original LockOn from the CD and then installed the FC2.0. Didn't apply FC1.1 or any patch. Then uninstalled the LockOn. NO FC installation? how about Su-25t? do you have it?
Mirtma Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 NO FC installation? how about Su-25t? do you have it? Yes, you have it. This is complete new installation. You need to have LockOn 1 installed just because licence. For me is running a bit faster, and it looks much better. From box, without any tweaks. Wide monitor supported etc... Gigabyte Z490 Gaming X | i5 10600K@4700 | 32 Gb DDR4 @ 3200Mhz | Gigabyte Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G | MONITOR IIYAMA 24,5" LED LCD @ 1920 x 1080 | Windows 11 | Saitek X-55 Rhino | TrackIR 5 Pro
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 Yes, you have it. This is complete new installation. You need to have LockOn 1 installed just because licence. For me is running a bit faster, and it looks much better. From box, without any tweaks. Wide monitor supported etc... Thanks. So if you purchased 1.1 with them online, you get 2.0 for 14.99, but if you want a new installation, you have to pay 20 something bucks right?
Thunderbird Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 nah i dont think so, for FC 2.0 u need to pay $29.99
Mirtma Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Thanks. So if you purchased 1.1 with them online, you get 2.0 for 14.99, but if you want a new installation, you have to pay 20 something bucks right? 14.95 is version 1.1. LockOn FC2 is 29.99$ Gigabyte Z490 Gaming X | i5 10600K@4700 | 32 Gb DDR4 @ 3200Mhz | Gigabyte Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G | MONITOR IIYAMA 24,5" LED LCD @ 1920 x 1080 | Windows 11 | Saitek X-55 Rhino | TrackIR 5 Pro
Shaman Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Shkval now hits FPS much more then in FC1. On my system it's a hit that prevents me from smooth game-play. 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
FBW Posted March 29, 2010 Author Posted March 29, 2010 Shkval now hits FPS much more then in FC1. On my system it's a hit that prevents me from smooth game-play. Well since i don't play SU-25T (I assume this is a 25t feature?)
Shaman Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Well since i don't play SU-25T (I assume this is a 25t feature?) Yeah only there. Strange, since DCS Ka-50 Shkval doesn't hit FPS so much when compared to FC2 Su-25T Shkval. 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
Mustang Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Yeah only there. Strange, since DCS Ka-50 Shkval doesn't hit FPS so much when compared to FC2 Su-25T Shkval. Same here, the FPS goes from smooth to a sudden jerk-fest when i look at certain areas, but when i zoom right in, the FPS is ok again.
Mugenjin Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 aye, same here, quite strange. I can easily run the game with 4xAA/AF, but a lot of stuttering when pointing the shkval on the ground;fully zoome out.
DummyBoy Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 Salute all! Same problem here ... everything is great, the game is running smooth, but if I switch on Skhval, my fps is halved ... The biggest problem is than the Su-25T is my favourite plane ...
OGREMAN Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 I have a mid range DuelCore PC with a good Graphic card and 3gig Ram, FC2 is running at slightly better or similar framerates to FC1.12 but delivering MUCH RICHER graphic detail. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
tflash Posted March 29, 2010 Posted March 29, 2010 On my QuadCore Q9550 2.83GHz with standard Nvidia 9300E it runs very well and faster than FC1.1; I had to do some anti-aliassing tweeks in NVidia config though. It also has good memory management on Windows 7; I can fly missions with many ground units, troops etc. without noticable impact. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts