ALDEGA Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Yes it will get me one baby per month in average over a nine months period.If you get them all pregnant at the same time you still have to wait nine months ... and then you'll be overwhelmed by the amount of kids, you won't be able to appreciate them much ...
sinelnic Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Oh, how wrong you are. Do you think that getting 9 women pregnant will get you a baby in 1 month? ;) Well, if you trick 9 developers into getting their women pregnant, then offer extra-hours bonus, who knows... who knows... Westinghouse W-600 refrigerator - Corona six-pack - Marlboro reds - Patience by Girlfriend "Engineering is the art of modelling materials we do not wholly understand, into shapes we cannot precisely analyse so as to withstand forces we cannot properly assess, in such a way that the public has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance." (Dr. A. R. Dykes - British Institution of Structural Engineers, 1976)
GGTharos Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Then I'd get an if player == "GGTharos" { aim_120_radar = off } :D Well, if you trick 9 developers into getting their women pregnant, then offer extra-hours bonus, who knows... who knows... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
GGTharos Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 No comment on anything that may or may not come with your pony - more specifically, I don't believe ED is keen on releasing information before they have a product nearly ready since they've been burned by releasing information and having to change plans before. More information will come at or near release time. For now, it was just a new aircraft announcement. As an example, even now there are references to the 9-month plan (although most people refer to it jokingly) for module releases. Stuff doesn't always work out, but people keep coming back and treating it all as a promise anyway. It's just not worth anyone's time to release information only to end up watching verbal diarrhea on the forum again when/if plans change. I'm really more interested if there's any other assets to go with the P-51, obviously i'm not the only one. I'm sure it will be a great simulation, however flying the Mustang in a modern environment, maybe strafing a few trucks just doesn't do it for me. Also, imo the low terrain graphics are the week point of the DCS (current) graphics engine, that will not help. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Speed Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 GG, you just need to open a word document, type out a generic explanation detailing how the ED team is specialized in certain areas AND working in parallel, so it is wrong to think that the next jet will be delayed by the amount of time it takes to develop P-51D, and just keep posting that about every 10 posts in this thread. It would save you a lot of time. Intelligent discourse can only begin with the honest admission of your own fallibility. Member of the Virtual Tactical Air Group: http://vtacticalairgroup.com/ Lua scripts and mods: MIssion Scripting Tools (Mist): http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=98616 Slmod version 7.0 for DCS: World: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=80979 Now includes remote server administration tools for kicking, banning, loading missions, etc.
Snoopy Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) .....only to end up watching verbal diarrhea on the forum.... That's 99% of this thread...the 1% is reminding folks what ED has said about parallel development...:D Edited January 25, 2012 by Snoopy v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website
docehrenhoefer Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Parallel development... okay. Now that the vintage aircraft friends have their toy :pilotfly:, what about some improvements on the terrain engine, of course in a parallel development of next fixed wing modern fighter? :music_whistling:
159th_Viper Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Parallel development... okay. Now that the vintage aircraft friends have their toy :pilotfly:, what about some improvements on the terrain engine, of course in a parallel development of next fixed wing modern fighter? :music_whistling: EDGE. Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
Nate--IRL-- Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Parallel development... okay. Now that the vintage aircraft friends have their toy :pilotfly:, what about some improvements on the terrain engine, of course in a parallel development of next fixed wing modern fighter? :music_whistling: That is the new EDGE terrain engine being developed, in parallel with all of the above, in the Eagle Dynamics Minsk office. Nate Ka-50 AutoPilot/stabilisation system description and operation by IvanK- Essential Reading
GGTharos Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Check out the work being done on Nevada! Parallel development... okay. Now that the vintage aircraft friends have their toy :pilotfly:, what about some improvements on the terrain engine, of course in a parallel development of next fixed wing modern fighter? :music_whistling: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
WarthogSmurf Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 since gg brought up nevada any word on that ? i see those beta thingies and i keep wondering when do they release it
Tailgate Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 No problem with the Mustang, however I'm curious at what spurred its development. Was there some kind of consensus or poll in the Flight Sim community to gauge it's popularity and marketing potential?
159th_Viper Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 ....however I'm curious at what spurred its development..... As said: While the P-51D started as an internal technology demonstration, it has evolved into an independent product that adds an all new dimension to the DCS universe. Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
sobek Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 No problem with the Mustang, however I'm curious at what spurred its development. Was there some kind of consensus or poll in the Flight Sim community to gauge it's popularity and marketing potential? As was said in the original anouncement, it spawned as an internal prop technology demonstrator. Popularity and ease of access to an actual flightworthy airframe and pilot probably did a lot too. Edit: Beaten to the Punch. Your spider sense is starting to give me the willies. :) Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
LostOblivion Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) I only see positive things about ED having multiple projects at once. Usually in my business when we work at more projects at once, we spur productivity since we are faced with a big work load. We might not get project A finished in X time, but we get all the projects A, B, and C finished in 2X time, which is only positive. Would you not rather see ED put out three aircraft in 4 years, than one in 2 years, then another one 2 years after? :) Also, working on several projects means a lot of research is being done, some of which would probably not occur if they only worked on the jet, meaning less features in the next jet aircraft. ;) F.ex. if they have figured out an outstanding template/engine that is quite generic for making the flight model of the Mustang, this would also significantly improve the next jet flight model. I'm going to quote Sheldon Lee Cooper, B.S., M.S., M.A., Ph.D., Sc.D., on this one: "When Albert Einstein came up with special relativity, he was working at the patent office." Edited January 25, 2012 by LostOblivion Nice plane on that gun... OS764 P930@4 MBUD3R M6GB G5870 SSDX25 CAntec1200 HTMHW
HitchHikingFlatlander Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 since gg brought up nevada any word on that ? i see those beta thingies and i keep wondering when do they release it It will be out when its ready Smurf. Its a totally different beast than it was in the A10C beta days. Everything I've seen that ED has released tells me it's worth waiting for. http://dcs-mercenaries.com/ USA Squad
SimFreak Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 I'm game for early paid-beta release. :D Can't wait to do touch-n-goes with her
effte Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) The cruise speeds and max speeds of the P51D and A10 are basically identical, with the P51D having a slightly faster cruise speed. The A10's rate of climb is twice that of a P51D, but the P51D is overall much more manuaverable. Specific excess power is the power available to do things, per unit of weight of the airframe, once all the energy requirements of flying S&L are met. The SEP can be used either to climb or to turn. It is a good measure of the relative performance of aircraft. The SEP is usually represented by the rate of climb which can be achieved. The A-10C has twice as much of it as the P-51D. It'll be an interesting fight. I often tell people that Real Aircraft have propellers. I maintain that jet engines only work due to a miscalculation, and that one day this error will be found and they will all stop. Yet I can't bring myself to believe your assumption to be true. Edited January 25, 2012 by effte Clarification, to avoid having GG and PeterP have a go at me for obfuscating the physics. ;) 1 ----- Introduction to UTM/MGRS - Trying to get your head around what trim is, how it works and how to use it? - DCS helos vs the real world.
LostOblivion Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 I maintain that jet engines only work due to a miscalculation, and that one day this error will be found and they will all stop. What do you mean? Nice plane on that gun... OS764 P930@4 MBUD3R M6GB G5870 SSDX25 CAntec1200 HTMHW
PeterP Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 What do you mean? He clearly talks about the same phenomenon why a helicopters stays in the air.
GGTharos Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Unfortunately this makes you wrong. On the internet. I hope you understand the dire consequences of this :D I often tell people that Real Aircraft have propellers. I maintain that jet engines only work due to a miscalculation, and that one day this error will be found and they will all stop. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
effte Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Unfortunately this makes you wrong. On the internet. I hope you understand the dire consequences of this :D Ah, I see that you have missed a very basic principle of How the World Works. See, it sometimes happens that what I say and reality does not agree. The basic principle, ranking slightly above Newton's laws, general relativity and the Grand Unified Field Theory when considering validity, is that in such a case reality is wrong. If you all just remember this things will get a lot easier around here. ;) PeterP got it. Same thing as with the whirlybirds. And PFIL. ----- Introduction to UTM/MGRS - Trying to get your head around what trim is, how it works and how to use it? - DCS helos vs the real world.
LostOblivion Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 I think many are looking forward to the day the forums look like this: 9 Nice plane on that gun... OS764 P930@4 MBUD3R M6GB G5870 SSDX25 CAntec1200 HTMHW
EtherealN Posted January 25, 2012 Posted January 25, 2012 Hahah, okey, that one was funny. Nice touch with the thread title there... :P [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
Recommended Posts