fastfreddie Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 Watched a video a few weeks back with P-47s taking off from carriers in the Pacific. The marines/army would capture an airfield on an island and the P-47 would take off and land on the captured fields. They would then be able to provide air support to the immediate region but couldn't return to the carrier. Can't wait to fly this plane in DCS. Any word on progress?
RAZBAM_ELMO Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 Watched a video a few weeks back with P-47s taking off from carriers in the Pacific. The marines/army would capture an airfield on an island and the P-47 would take off and land on the captured fields. They would then be able to provide air support to the immediate region but couldn't return to the carrier. Can't wait to fly this plane in DCS. Any word on progress? can you share that link? hard to believe that a jug could take off from a carrier deck even in a headwind, Know and use all the capabilities in your airplane. If you don't, sooner or later, some guy who does use them all will kick your ass. — Dave 'Preacher' Pace, USN.
[DBS]TH0R Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 One word: catapult. :) Here, I googled it for you: P8Z68 | 2500k @ 4.5 | GTX 1080Ti | 2x8 GB @ 1600 | TM Hog (extended 7cm) & MFG Crosswind (S/N 007) | TIR v5 WWII bomber formations | DCS P-51D: [TEST] TO distance / gross weight / temperature
Barrett_g Posted April 28, 2015 Author Posted April 28, 2015 can you share that link? hard to believe that a jug could take off from a carrier deck even in a headwind, Good read: http://home.earthlink.net/%7Eatdouble/%7E318thFighterGroup.Saipan.html
RAZBAM_ELMO Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 Hmm interesting, but from what I know, catapults usually link in some way to the aircraft itself. PM me cause it's very interesting and i'd like to know a bit more about this particular circumstance and not get off topic in this thread. Know and use all the capabilities in your airplane. If you don't, sooner or later, some guy who does use them all will kick your ass. — Dave 'Preacher' Pace, USN.
Barrett_g Posted April 28, 2015 Author Posted April 28, 2015 I believe they attached a cable to the mooring points in the Main Landing Gear in a way that it would fall away once catapulted. You can see the cable in this shot:
ED Team NineLine Posted April 28, 2015 ED Team Posted April 28, 2015 This vid shows one way to launch a P-47 off a carrier :) Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
fastfreddie Posted May 2, 2015 Posted May 2, 2015 Starts at 26:30 showing the loaded up and continues throughout the launching procedure (catapults) to landing on the island. Great video overall.
Evilducky Posted May 4, 2015 Posted May 4, 2015 Hopefully this hasn't been posted here, but field assembly of the P-47. Enjoy :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2D3k0sJ8HM&feature=youtu.be
JesseJames38 Posted May 5, 2015 Posted May 5, 2015 I enjoy all these interesting videos and information. the one thing I am curious about in the news letter there is a guage at the bottom left that I usly see a altimter located at on all the other P-47 pits. Althought the one in the news letter looks like something else. or a very strange altimeter then what I have ever seen. It is the gauge just above the placard "warning: do not open cowl flaps above 225 IAS. http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=113685&d=1425053400 But I recommend this sight that really likes to look at cockpits of aircraft as its a nice 3d set up from the pilots seat that you can scroll around to look at things http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/virtualtour/cockpits.asp Jesse
fastfreddie Posted May 5, 2015 Posted May 5, 2015 Maybe its just a placeholder gauge but it does look strange. Guess we'll have to wait till we get closer to release to hear more or see if it gets replaced.
sobek Posted May 5, 2015 Posted May 5, 2015 The small gauge inside looks like a suction gauge. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
RAZBAM_ELMO Posted May 5, 2015 Posted May 5, 2015 I believe they attached a cable to the mooring points in the Main Landing Gear in a way that it would fall away once catapulted. You can see the cable in this shot: Ahhh as I suspected, I didn't think that they would have used that method early in the war ( i might be wrong as to the circa) but none the less interesting. My second assumption was a spring loaded bar similar to whats used on modern day naval aircraft on the nose gear but instead mounted on the belly. Know and use all the capabilities in your airplane. If you don't, sooner or later, some guy who does use them all will kick your ass. — Dave 'Preacher' Pace, USN.
Barrett_g Posted May 11, 2015 Author Posted May 11, 2015 Anyone know the full story behind this photo? Heard the pilot rammed a house....
Barrett_g Posted May 11, 2015 Author Posted May 11, 2015 (edited) ^ found the info I was looking for!!! On Pinterest though... Anyways maybe it's legit: During an attack at low altitude, Raymundo da Costa Canário, flying 1st Brazilian Fighter Squadron P-47D #44-19663 , collided with an industry chimney which fell down. In the collision the P-47 lost 1.28m (50.394") of the right wing, but that loss of a part of the wing did not hinder it coming back to the base. *edit: found more of the story* 1st Brazilian Fighter Squadron - Red Flight P-47D-25 "A6" Flown by Asp. Canario returned from a missions almost without one wing! "In 01/27/1945 the Red flight (aircraft code: "A") took off for one more sortie, with the 1º Ten. Av. Dornelles as leader of the formation, and one young pilot called Raymundo da Costa Canario, flying the P-47D #44-19663 (the "A6" aircraft). Canario was originally pilot of the Yellow flight. During an attack at low altitude, Canario collided with an industry chimney which fell down. In the collision the P-47 lost 1.28m (50.394") of the right wing, but that loss of a part of the wing did not hinder it coming back to the base. Dornelles was his guide, opting to fly over the Adriatic Sea: over the land there was much Germany flak and low and dense clouds. Over Veneza some Spitfires had almost knocked them down therefore they had not recognized them immediately as allied pilots. After this "small" incident , Dornelles flew with Canario until 5000 ft, keeping silence on the radio. The low and dense clouds made it difficult for a visual approach; when Dornelles found a hole in the clouds he told Canario: "wait for me here. I will to go down to have a look and and I will come back to to tell you if this airstrip is OK!" Well, at age of 20, Canario ignored the acknowledgment and flew right back with Dornelles. A few moments before Canario to land he heard on the radio: "abort! abort! A P-61 Blackwidow needed to make an emergency landing!". Canario pulled up the P-47, made another final approach and landed safely. Dornelles flew 89 missions (he used to say "I'll never became 90 missions) - he died in 04/26/1945, flying his P-47. Canario flew 51 missions. He survived the war." Edited May 11, 2015 by Barrett_g 1
RAZBAM_ELMO Posted May 17, 2015 Posted May 17, 2015 Just goes to show how rugged the Juggernaut really was, incredible stories that them and their heroing flights lol Know and use all the capabilities in your airplane. If you don't, sooner or later, some guy who does use them all will kick your ass. — Dave 'Preacher' Pace, USN.
Barrett_g Posted May 17, 2015 Author Posted May 17, 2015 DCS is going to have its hands full regarding damage modeling! Can you imagine all the guys saying "look at this pic with half the wing missing," or "read this account where the cylinder was shot off." There will be a lot of people getting shot down and believing they should have made it home! Just look at how they gripe about the P-51! (Though I admit the prop pitch seems a little out of hand!)
IronJockel Posted May 18, 2015 Posted May 18, 2015 (edited) DCS is going to have its hands full regarding damage modeling! Can you imagine all the guys saying "look at this pic with half the wing missing," or "read this account where the cylinder was shot off." There will be a lot of people getting shot down and believing they should have made it home! Just look at how they gripe about the P-51! (Though I admit the prop pitch seems a little out of hand!) I guess a lot of these claims will be sorted out. A good burst of 20mm or even 30mm high explosiv shells will even rip this beast appard. I believe ED knows how to make the Jugs DM as correct as possible. Edited May 18, 2015 by IronJockel [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Solty Posted May 18, 2015 Posted May 18, 2015 (edited) DCS is going to have its hands full regarding damage modeling! Can you imagine all the guys saying "look at this pic with half the wing missing," or "read this account where the cylinder was shot off." There will be a lot of people getting shot down and believing they should have made it home! Just look at how they gripe about the P-51! (Though I admit the prop pitch seems a little out of hand!) Right now DCS realy needs a lot of work on the DM. And YoYo has confirmed it...we can only have hope they can get it to better standard with P-47. Edited May 18, 2015 by Solty [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]In 21st century there is only war and ponies. My experience: Jane's attack squadron, IL2 for couple of years, War Thunder and DCS. My channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyAXX9rAX_Sqdc0IKJuv6dA
whitehot Posted May 19, 2015 Posted May 19, 2015 lookin forward to the jug.. I wasn't interested in ww2 planes, but then i bought the p-51, and liked it. The p-47 is one of my absolute faves in ww2, will get it day one. Will never get german planes though - and I doubt british too. yet everything american or soviet is a sure buy to me. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Intel i7 6700K @ 4.2, MSI M5 Z170A Gaming, NZXT X61 Kraken liquid cooler, PNY Nvidia GTX 1080 Founders Edition, 16GB Corsair Vengeance 3000 Mhz C15, samsung 840 evo SSD, CoolerMaster 1000W Gold rated PSU, NZXT Noctis 450 cabinet, Samsung S240SW 24' 1920x1200 LED panel, X-52 Pro Flight stick. W10 Pro x64 1809, NO antivirus EVER
Teapot Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Will never get german planes though - and I doubt british too. yet everything american or soviet is a sure buy to me. Each to their own. As for me, I'll buy everything with a propeller and preferably WWII vintage. Historically each side jumped at the chance to fly and evaluate the adversary's planes and in DCS we can do that quite easily plus we help to insure longevity for the historically accurate flight simulation genre. :pilotfly: "A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft." Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking!
ED Team NineLine Posted May 20, 2015 ED Team Posted May 20, 2015 Lets steer the discussion back towards the P-47 please. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Recommended Posts