All Activity

I hope some manager from ED could update that statment about 3rd party files shared with ED so future costumers should make better informed decisions when buying things at ED store.l

It was one thing when it was VEAO's Hawk, but now it's 4 aircraft and their solution (at the present) is keep a legacy version installed. I cannot underline how absurd that is when we're looking at 200+ gig installs. This is an absolutely untenable position for ED to give us. Granted, there's a lot that can change in this timeframe since we're talking quite a bit of time in the future, but it's still there. ED will have to bite the bullet, some how, if it wants to maintain positive customer will. It needs to also reconsider how it on boards third parties. This requirement to make game files available seems awfully wishy-washy. Is that the case for ALL third parties or was Razbam afforded special treatment because of how long they've been here? Quite a few uncomfortable questions need to be answered.

I saw a post in the Corsair forum that some were getting a CTD when trapping on the Essex carrier. I went into a MP server and trapped on an Essex carrier with the F4U. Result - CTD. I then went into a MP seer that had F18s and trapped on a supercarrier. Result - CTD. In both servers I did not use the Comms menu.

No refunds on steam, thats how.

NineLine говорит, что соглашение пока не подписано. И что в том случае, когда в 3.0 модули Razbam отвалятся, версия 2.9 будет официально доступна для игроков. Посмотрим, может, получат код всё же. Пока официального подтверждения о подписании нет.

My answer is the same for pretty much all modules, the mission editor. The ME isn't that difficult to use in my opinion but it does take some time to learn. ME missions also don't have to be predictable even if you're the one who made them. There are many ways to add elements of surprise or random events into missions. There are also a few automated mission creation tools outside of DCS if you really don't want to use the ME. Briefing Room being one example. I have never used these tools though so I'm not familiar with them.

In MP CTD now happens whenever comms is not employed when landing on a carrier. Just tried the Corsair on DCSNZA MP server and the F18 on another MP server. Both time my system CTD when I trapped. Suspect it is a ED issue not one limited to F4U.

I am pretty sure that gear was up.... I will try again

Witchcraft! Burn him on the stake! Fast Forward until the very end and then take it out and flip it!

Удаляйте тему, продано.

Geez...crazy town!! I have no faith mine (Super 57PPD) will come this summer...I'm thinking fall.

Эх, конечно, я бы предпочёл что бы Ф-15Е к ЕД отошёл. Но нет фарта, судя по всему.

If the INS goes to IFA RDR when the knob is placed in IFA, there is no GPS available (or line of sight to the satellites is blocked), and the aircraft is attempting to perform an in-flight alignment.

Make sure that 1) you have the JHMCS equipped and not the NVG. You can only take either or. 2) You have not pressed and held DMS down. This toggles the JHMCS on/off.

Maybe its me but whoever at ED thinks about 3 DCS versions to be able to fly the Hawk, Razbam Modules and keep having updates beyond 2.9 is a fair solution... This is absurd at a biblical dimension. "Hey dear costumers, not a problem here, you can fly your favourite modules. Just keep 2.5.3 DCS, 2.9 DCS and 3.0 DCS version in your computer" Thanks for you passion and support. If this situation wasnt advertised false by ED years ago, i didnt believe it. Remember: This is still an oficial statement not changed yet " To avoid such issues in the future all 3d party are now required to make the game files available in case they are no longer able to support their products"

Yes, but you also reported poor image quality, hence my suggestion to try with DLSS off or at least set to Quality. In order to rule out DLSS as the cause of your perceived loss in image quality. What headset are you using actually? You also alluded to the fact that you are using VD? Right now I don‘t have a solution to your problem. QVFR works fine to me with a QuestPro. I don‘t fly helicopters though…

Thanks. I wish there were more campaigns. I did buy the C101 right now during the sale.

Totally understand. EDs ponzi scheme is approaching the cliff every ponzi scheme hits. Sorry to read this, ch. Lots of us are in VERY similar headspaces. EDs end is approaching and it appears they are blissfully unaware or simply don't care. Heck, I just installed that other sim and am getting the hotas and VR setup.

Diamondback CAG skin now available, link posted above.

Conditions: Free Flight Instant Action on the Afghanistan map. Latest version. Log and track file attached. Problem: After turning on HMCS, it doesn't appear. Doesn't matter if it is in free flight, a mission editor mission, whether it's a cold star, an air start. It just doesn't work. Reproducible on all maps, happens in all conditions. I have added deadzones to all axes that are being used, that did nothing. Performed full repair. Nothing. dcs.log 16hmcs.trk

This all is really strange. All the time i thought this "There was a settlement signed by everyone" thing was just the "normal" trash talk by Razbam. Now it's confirmed to be true. Ok, that doesn't mean anything. I'm just a bit worried about the fact that it was already signed at least 7 or maybe even 8 month ago and nothing changed. One might think that a settlement means that both parties agree to something and stick to it.... How can you sign a settlement and then.... what? Pull back and just don't stick to the conditions? And how can you still call it a settlement? Already signed end of 2024? Was it by coincidence at the same time when Kate Perederko wrote these "MiG-23 will be a thing" and "Don't worry about your F-15. The Strike Eagle will see developement - this way or the other..." stuff? But what really, really disappoints me is the fact that we went from: "We will do our best to keep the RB modules working as they are" through: "We will do our best to keep the RB modules working until DCS 2.9x to: "we will keep an older version of DCS available for those that still want to use those IF this dispute is not solved." It also pi**es me off that we went from: "We set up a new contract with the third party devs in order to avoid another disaster like with the Hawk." through: "What happened to the Hawk will not happen to the RB modules except from the SE since the other modules are already out of EA." to: ....yeah - same as above - keeping an older version for the RB modules availabe.... so in the future we might need a third DCS install to play with all our modules we have paid for? I was always hoping for a post in this thread about a settlement and the continuation of the cooperation between ED and RB. But now i think there will be the day when the announcement is just like: "We are pleased to announce that we will release DCS 3.0 with the next update. All RB users please make sure to make a copy of the current version in order to keep your RB modules working...." That's all weird - really weird. To me it is obvious that ED expects to loose all 4 RB modules in DCS. Great, well done guys, well done (both parties). Get your stuff together!!

There's just one small problem: refunds can be made in the ED store, but how will this be handled on Steam?

I’d like to report a bug. The HUD of the F/A-18 occasionally shifts (as shown in the image). There was no wind on the server, and I selected a hot start instead of a cold start, so we can rule out user error. I spawned using a dynamic parking hot start at Kutaisi airbase, with a loadout of two Mk-84s and two Mavericks. Everything looked fine during taxi, but as I accelerated for takeoff, the HUD suddenly shifted to the left. Again, there’s no wind on the server, so external factors shouldn’t be the cause. When I switched to the F-16, the HUD remained stable during takeoff, which further suggests this issue is specific to the F/A-18. From my experience, this problem only happens when using dynamic parking spots — I don’t recall encountering it with traditional ramp or runway starts. Additionally, in some single-player missions, the F/A-18 starts hot with the IFA countdown screen stuck. Thecountdown continues, but the page doesn’t disappear as it should. 8770AFD8-916C-4EE2-A0CE-C5B93FD48455.mov 多人联机打靶图20250721练飞,对空对地,编队,空加-20250726-195457.trk

Normally there is no pilot head, as it would obstruct the normal view. However, there are two ways to get it. The first one is to simply move the outside camera in the cockpit. The second one is by maybe tricking the view outside of the view limits, you may get it to load the external pilot model into the cockpit model, or something like that. I don't know how to do that, though there was a topic around on how to do that with the F-16. You might be able to do the same for the F-5.

I've reached 535 km/h TAS ( 332 MPH or 289 KTS ) in 5000 meters ( 16 404 feet ) in level flight. MPR 54", 2700 RPM, low blower